ORDER 1. The present petition under section 482 of CrPC has been preferred seeking for the following relief :- “By allowing this petition, the impugned order dated 17.7.2009 passed by the Sessions Judge, Gwalior in Criminal Revision No.240/2009 be quashed along with the order dated 15.6.2009 passed by the JMFC, Gwalior in Criminal Case No.4986/2009 issued in a private complaint case filed by the respondent against the petitioner under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.” 2. It is submitted by the counsel for the petitioner that one private complaint under section 138 of the NI Act was preferred by respondent-Mascot Trade Links Ganesh Bazar, Lashkar, Gwalior against present petitioner Haresh. This complaint was barred by limitation being filed after a period of 15-20 days but this fact was overlooked by both the Courts-below and therefore the orders passed are against the facts and law. It is therefore submitted that the petition may be allowed and relief claimed therein may be granted in favour of the petitioner. 3. In turn, it is submitted by Shri Bahirani, learned counsel for the respondent that 15-20 days in filing the present complaint was already condoned by the trial Court on the ground that the complainant was suffering from Hepatitis. Hence, the orders passed by the Courts-below are well merited in the light of the provisions contemplated in section 142(b) of the NI Act. That apart the present petition which has been preferred amounts to second revision which is not maintainable. On such premises, it is prayed that the petition may be dismissed. 4. After having heard counsel for both the sides and given thoughtful considerations to the findings of the Courts-below, this Court is of the considered view that no illegality or irregularity has been committed warranting interference by this Court under inherent jurisdiction. Even otherwise, after dismissal of the revision by the Court below, present petition preferred under section 482 of CrPC against such dismissal would not lie as it would amount to circumventing the provision which prohibits second revision. Therefore, testing the matter from all four corners of law, this Court finds that the petition is bereft of merits. It is accordingly dismissed.