JUDGMENT : Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. (Oral) Heard Mr. Vikas Anand, Advocate present for the applicant and Mr. P.S. Saun, Dy. Advocate General assisted by Mr. D.K. Bankoti, Brief Holder present for the State of Uttarakhand. 2. The First Information Report was lodged by respondent no.2 who is the father of one Ms. Kamla @ Shipra against applicant No.5 who allegedly kidnapped her girl as well as against his mother, father, brother and sister as far back in the year 2010. After investigation, police submitted charge sheet under Sections 363/366A of IPC in which learned Magistrate took cognizance on 21.03.2011 and issued summons to the present applicants. Now after a period of four years, the present application under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. has been filed by the present applicants invoking the inherent jurisdiction of this Court. 3. At this stage, no interference of this Court is called for in the matter as proceedings have been challenged belatedly. Nevertheless, there were no allegations against the applicant Nos.1,2,3 & 4 who are mother, father, brother and sister of the applicant No.5 respectively. In any case, applicants are not hardened criminals and by means of present application, applicants have tried to show before this Court that earlier applicant No.5 has actually married to Kamla @ Shipra. Certain documents to this effect have also been annexed. The applicants are at liberty to move application for their bail before the court concerned. In case they do, it shall be considered, as far as possible, on the same day itself. In case, it is deferred for any reason (including its rejection), the trial court shall consider granting interim bail to the applicants and forward the papers on the same day before the Sessions court which again shall consider their bail as far as possible, on the same day itself, on the same terms as given to the learned Magistrate herein. 4. With the aforesaid observation, the application under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. stands disposed.