JUDGMENT : Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. (Oral) Heard Mr. Raj Kumar Singh Verma, Advocate present for the petitioners and Mr. P.S. Saun, learned Dy. Advocate General with Mr. H.S. Rawal, A.G.A. present for the State of Uttarakhand. 2. A First Information Report has been lodged by the respondent No.3 against her husband and father- in-law who are petitioner No.1 and petitioner No.2 respectively, which has been registered as FIR No.200 of 2015 under Sections 498A/323/342/504/506 of IPC and Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, at Police Station Bajpur, District Udham Singh Nagar. Apprehending their arrest, the petitioners have approached this Court for relief. 3. The marriage of petitioner No.1 with respondent No.3 was solemnized in the year 2007. There are allegations of demand of dowry, harassment and torture. 4. As per F.I.R., prima facie, it appears that the root cause is a matrimonial dispute. 5. At this stage, no interference of this Court is called for. Considering the nature of offence and since the maximum punishment in the above offences is seven years or less, a limited interference is called for in the matter. 6. In view thereof, the writ petition stands disposed with the direction to the police authorities to proceed with the investigation in accordance with law but so far as the arrest of the petitioners is required, the same shall be done only under the parameters as framed under Section 41 Cr.P.C. read with the directions given by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar & another, reported in (2014) 8 SCC 273 , are complied with, inter alia, by giving due notice and reasons, if the arrest is required. 7. It is made clear that this order shall remain operative till the filing of charge sheet.