Judgment 1. Mr.V.Muruganandam, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents 1 and 2. Since the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, seeks for a direction to the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the proposal sent for approval of the appointment of the petitioner, notice to the third respondent is dispensed with. By consent of both the parties, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission. 2. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 and 2. 3. The petitioner is seeking for a Writ of Mandamus to direct the first respondent to approve the proposal sent by the third respondent appointing the petitioner as a Secondary Grade Teacher in the third respondent's School and disburse the salary and other attendant benefits to the petitioner. 4. It is the case of the petitioner that she was appointed as a Secondary Grade Teacher at the third respondent's School on 03.06.2014, and the proposal seeking for approval of such appointment is also sent by the third respondent on the very same day. The petitioner has also sent a representation on 03.06.2014, seeking for approval of appointment followed by another representation on 12.01.2015. It is stated that the respondents 1 and 2 have not passed any orders on the proposal sent by the School as well as the representation given by the petitioner. 5. Therefore, without expressing any view on the merits and the contentions raised by the petitioner, this Court only directs the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the proposal sent by the third respondent's School on 03.06.2014, followed by the petitioner's representation dated 03.06.2014 and 12.01.2015 and pass suitable orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.