JUDGMENT : Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. (Oral) 1. Mr. Raj Kumar Singh, Advocate, for the applicant. 2. Mr. H.S. Rawal, learned A.G.A, for the State/respondent no. 1. 3. Mr. Navneet Kaushik, Advocate, for the respondent no. 2. 4. The first information report was lodged by the respondent no. 2 against the present applicant under Sections 323/506 of IPC and under Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, which has been registered as Case Crime No. 379 of 2014 at Police Station Gangnahar, District Haridwar. After investigation the police filed the charge-sheet against the present applicant and consequently the learned Magistrate took cognizance in the matter and issued summons against the present applicant. Hence, the present application under Section 482 CrPC before this Court. 5. This Court is not inclined to interfere with the court proceedings. However, considering the fact that the applicant is a school teacher in a government school and presently paying a maintenance of Rs.12,000/- (Rupees Twelve Thousand Only) per month to his wife/respondent no.2, which is her sole source of subsistence as of now and incase the applicant is arrested not only this will jeopardize his carrier but will deprive his family from maintenance of Rs.12,000/- (Rupees Twelve Thousand Only) per month. 6. At this stage, no interference is called for in the matter. The applicant would be at liberty to move an application for his bail before the court below, which shall be considered, as far as possible, on the same day itself, on the merits of the case. In case, for any reason, the bail is deferred, the court below shall consider granting interim bail to the applicant, considering that the petitioner is a government teacher in a school. 7. In view of the above, the application under Section 482 CrPC stands disposed accordingly.