M. Abbas Ali v. Director of Elementary Education, Chennai
2015-01-28
K.RAVICHANDRA BAABU
body2015
DigiLaw.ai
Judgment 1. Mr.V.Muruganandham learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents 1 and 2 and Mr.A.Nawaz Khan, learned Standing Counsel takes notice for the third respondent and by consent of both the parties, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission. 2. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents 1 and 2 and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the third respondent. 3. In this writ petition, the petitioner is seeking for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned proceedings issued by the second respondent in his proceedings Na.Ka.no.2129/A2/2014 dated 25.08.2014 and quash the same as illegal and consequently to direct the second respondent to approve the petitioner's appointment as Physical Education Teacher w.e.f 02.06.2014. 4. Though the petitioner contends that through the impugned order, the petitioner's request for appointment is sought to be rejected, a perusal of the impugned proceedings would show that, it is only a proceeding seeking for some clarifications from the petitioner with regard to the decree obtained by him. Therefore, it is for the petitioner to clarify the second respondent with necessary and relevant particulars. After furnishing all those particulars, it is for the second respondent to consider the request of the petitioner, seeking for approval of appointment and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law. 5. Therefore, without expressing any view on the merits and the contentions raised by the petitioner in this writ petition, the petitioner is directed to furnish the clarification and other particulars as sought for by the second respondent in the impugned proceedings within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On perusal of such clarification, the second respondent shall pass orders on merits and in accordance with law on the proposal submitted for approval of the petitioner's appointment, within a period of eight weeks thereafter. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous petitions are closed. No costs.