Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2015 DIGILAW 537 (RAJ)

Motilal v. Mangi Bai

2015-02-26

MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA

body2015
JUDGMENT : Mahesh Chandra Sharma, J. The instant appeal has been filed against the impugned judgment and award dated 10.3.2010 passed by the Judge, MACT, Baran. 2. Brief facts of the case are that on 3.6.2008 at about 2.30 pm when the deceased Chittarlal was going from Chowki Borda to Bamla in the tractor bearing No.RJ-28RA-1794, suddenly deceased Chittarlal fell down from the tractor and in the result, the Chittarlal was died on spot. With regard to the aforesaid accident, a claim petition was filed on behalf of the claimant/s claiming compensation as mentioned therein. 3. Notices were issued to the opposite parties. Reply to the claim petition was filed and the learned Tribunal framed the issues. After hearing all the parties, the learned Tribunal passed the aforesaid impugned judgment & award dated 10.3.2010. 4. Against the impugned judgment and award dated 10.3.2010, the appellant/non-claimants preferred the instant appeal for the relief as prayed for in it. 5. Learned counsel for the appellant has contended that the learned Tribunal has failed to appreciate each and every aspect of the matter as also the evidence available on record. The award passed by the learned Tribunal is illegal, without jurisdiction and contrary to the facts of the case. Hence impugned award deserves to be set aside. 6. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondents has opposed the submissions advanced on behalf of appellant and requested for enhancement of award. 7. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned judgment and award dated 10.3.2010. Hence impugned award deserves to be set aside. 6. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondents has opposed the submissions advanced on behalf of appellant and requested for enhancement of award. 7. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned judgment and award dated 10.3.2010. I am in agreement with the findings arrived at by the learned Tribunal, which are reproduced as under: bl fook|d dks fl) djus dk Hkkj vizkFkhZ la0 3 ij FkkA ,u0,0MCY;q0 1 v'kksd 'kekZ dk dFku gS fd mUgksaus V~sDVj batu uEcj 33561393 pSfpl uEcj 09053501688 dk chek fnukad 27@02@08 ls 26@02@09 ds fy, QkeZj iSdst ikWfylh ds vUrxZr fd;k Fkk] iksfylh izn'kZ ,0 5 gSA okgu dks oS| o izHkkoh pkyd ykbZlsUl/kkjh gh pyk ldrk gSA ;g ckr , ls ch Hkkx esa vafdr gSA chek dEiuh }kjk okgu Lokeh ls dsoy ,d O;fDr pkyd dk izhfe;e fd;k x;k Fkk o mlh dk tksf[ke Lohdkj fd;k x;k FkkA VªsDVj esa fdjk;s ls lokjh ;k vU; dksbZ O;fDr cSBkus ij chek dEiuh dk dksbZ nkf;Ro ugha curk gSA bl izdj.k esa tkap djokbZ Fkh] ftldh fjiksVZ izn'kZ ,0 6 gSA nsoyky] jktey] vYrkQ gqlSu ds /kkjk 161 n0iz0la0 ds c;kuksa dh izekf.kr izfrfyfi dze'k% izn'kZ ,0 7 ls ,0 9 gSA Jo.k ds c;kuksa dh izekf.kr izfr izn'kZ ,0 4 gSA lHkh us e`rd dk V~sDVj esa lokj gksuk crk;k FkkA izfrijh{kk ds nkSjku xokg us Lohdkj fd;k fd nsoyky] Jo.k] jktey o vYrkQ ls bUosLVhxsVj ls iwNrkN ugha dhA xokg us Lohdkj fd;k fd ?kj ij ftu yksxksa ls iwNrkN dh Fkh os yksx e`rd ds lkFk ?kVukLFky ij ekStwn ugha FksA oDr nq?kZVuk V~sDVj esa fdrus yksx cSBs Fks rFkk muds D;k uke Fks] mldh tkudkjh esa ugha gSA mls bl ckr dk irk ugha gS fd oDr nq?kZVuk V~sDVj d`f"k dk;Z esa dke vk jgk gksA ;ksX; vf/koDrk vizkFkhZ la[;k 7 dk cgl ds nkSjku dFku Fkk fd oDr nq?kZVuk V~sDVj dk iz;ksx d`f"k dk;Z ls fHkUu dk;Z esa fd;k tk jgk FkkA blds vykok V~sDVj dh {kerk ,d gh O;fDr dh Fkh] tks pkyd dh gS rFkk mlh dh tksf[ke Lohdkj djrs gq, chek dEiuh }kjk izhfe;e fy;k x;k gS] vU; fdlh ds fy, izhfe;e ugha fy;k x;k gS] u gh vU; fdlh dh tksf[ke doj dh xbZ gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa e`rd tks V~sDVj ds eMxkMZ ij cSBk Fkk] mlds lEcU/k esa chek dEiuh dk dksbZ nkf;Ro ugha gSA ;ksX; vf/koDrk us vius dFkuksa dh iqf"V esa fuEu U;kf;d n`"VkUr is'k fd;s ftudk lEekuiwoZd voyksdu fd;k x;k%& 1 flfoy vihy uEcj 2674@07 (,l0lh0) Jherh ;kyOok o vU; cuke us'kuy bU';ksjsUl dEiuh fy0 o vU;] fu.kZ; fnukad 16@05@07 2 flfoy vihy uEcj 1718@07 (,l0lh0) vksfj,UVy bU';ksjsUl dEiuh fy0 cuke ukFkhckbZ o vU;] vkns'k fnukad 30@03@07 3 flfoy fofo/k vihy uEcj 374@01 (jkt0) ckxflag cuke us'kuy bU';ksjsUl dEiuh fy0] vkns'k fnukad 30@09@05 4 12007 , lh lh 924 (,l0lh0)] U;w bf.M;k ,';ksjsUl dEiuh fy0 cuke osnorh o vU;A 5 2005 (1) Vh0,0lh0 ist 314 (e/;izns'k) panuflag j?kqoa'kh cuke jkes'ojhckbZ o vU;A tokc esa ;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZx.k o vizkFkhZ la0 1 ls 6 dk dFku Fkk fd oDr nq?kZVuk okgu chfer Fkk] ,slh fLFkfr esa chek dEiuh dks izfrdj gsrq mRrjnk;h Bgjk;k tkosA ;ksX; vf/koDrk vizkFkhZ la0 7 dk dFku mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA i=koyh esa izLrqr lk{; ls ;g izdV gS fd e`rd fdjk;k nsdj V~sDVj esa cSBk Fkk] ftlls ;g izekf.kr gksrk gS fd oDr nq?kZVuk V~sDVj dk iz;ksx d`f"k ls fHkUu dk;Z esa fd;k tk jgk Fkk] bl izdkj chek 'krksZa dh mYya?kuk gqbZ gSA blds vykok V~sDVj dh cSBd {kerk ek= ,d O;fDr dh gS tks pkyd gSA izLrqr lk{; ls ;g Hkh izekf.kr gS fd flQZ ,d O;fDr pkyd ds lEcU/k esa gh chek dEiuh }kjk izhfe;e fy;k x;k gS rFkk vU; fdlh O;fDr ds fy, u rks izhfe;e fy;k x;k gS] u gh tksf[ke Lohdkj dh xbZ gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa ;ksX; vf/koDrk vizkFkhZ la0 7 dh vksj ls izLrqr U;kf;d n`"VkUrksa ds izdk'ke orZeku ekeys esa chek dEiuh dks izfrdj gsrq mRrjnk;h ugha Bgjk;k tk ldrkA vr% fook|d] vizkFkhZ la0 7 ds i{k esa rFkk izkFkhZx.k o vizkFkhZ la0 1 ls 6 ds f[kykQ fuf.kZr fd;k tkrk gSA 8. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and the findings arrived at by learned Tribunal as quoted herein above, the learned Tribunal is found to have dealt with each and every aspect of the matter, and has rightly passed the impugned judgment and award. I am in unison with the findings arrived at by the learned Tribunal. Hence, I do not think it just and proper to interfere with the impugned award dated 10.3.2010 passed by the Tribunal, and thus the appeal having no force, is hereby dismissed after confirming the judgment and award dated 10.3.2010 passed by the learned Tribunal. Appeal Dismissed.