Research › Search › Judgment

Himachal Pradesh High Court · body

2015 DIGILAW 552 (HP)

Anu Mahindru v. State of Himachal Pradesh

2015-05-19

MANSOOR AHMAD MIR, TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN

body2015
JUDGMENT : Mansoor Ahmad Mir J. Mr. B.L. Soni, learned counsel for the writ petitioners stated at the Bar that respondents No. 2 and 3 have filed reply in CWP No. 8337 of 2014 and prayed that all these writ petitions may be disposed of in terms of the reply contained in para 14 (I to IX), with all just exceptions, with a direction to respondents No. 2 and 3 to do the needful within four weeks. His statement is taken on record. 2. Mr. J.L. Bhardwaj, learned counsel for respondents No. 2 and 3, stated at the Bar that he is not averse to the said proposition, however, sought three months' time to do the needful. His statement is also taken on record. 3. Keeping in view the submissions made, we deem it proper to dispose of these writ petitions in terms of para 14 (I to IX) (supra) of the reply filed by respondents No. 2 and 3, with all just exceptions, with a direction to do the needful within eight weeks and report compliance before the Registrar (Judicial). 4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly alongwith all pending applications.