Judgment Abhilasha Kumari, J. 1. Rule. Mr. D.M. Devnani, learned Assistant Government Pleader waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of the respondents. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and with the consent of learned counsel for the respective parties, the petition is being heard and decided finally. 2. This petition under Article-226 of the Constitution of India has been preferred, inter-alia, with a prayer to grant the petitioner the benefits of the Government Resolution dated 17.10.1988. 3. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the petitioner was initially appointed as Watchman on daily-wage basis in July, 1981 and was performing his duties at Nayaka Nursery. His services were terminated on 01.05.1983, which led to the filing of a reference by the petitioner. The Labour Court, Surendranagar, by an award dated 31.08.2005, partially allowed the reference and directed the respondents to reinstate the petitioner with continuity of service, without back-wages. The petitioner was reinstated in service on 16.04.2006. The award of the Labour Court was challenged by respondent No. 2 by preferring a petition being Special Civil Application No. 3283/2006, which came to be dismissed by an order dated 28.02.2006. As the petitioner was still not permitted to join duties, he filed a petition being Special Civil Application No. 5538/2006, seeking appropriate directions upon the respondents to reinstate him. By an order dated 28.03.2006, this Court directed the respondents to reinstate the petitioner in service. The said petition was disposed of on 21.04.2006, directing the respondents to pay the arrears of salary with effect from 01.09.2005 to 15.04.2006. However, by an oral order dated 01.10.2007, the services of the petitioner came to be terminated once again. The petitioner filed I.D. Complaint No. 5/2007 before the Labour Court, Surendranagar. By an order dated 02.05.2014, the Labour Court directed the respondents to reinstated the petitioner without back-wages, but with continuity of service. The petitioner has been reinstated on 25.06.2014 and is working continuously on daily-wage basis. 4. It is the case of the petitioner that in view of the continuous nature of his service and the orders of the Labour Court granting him continuity of service, he is entitled to be granted the benefits of the Government Resolution dated 17.10.1988. 5. Mr. The petitioner has been reinstated on 25.06.2014 and is working continuously on daily-wage basis. 4. It is the case of the petitioner that in view of the continuous nature of his service and the orders of the Labour Court granting him continuity of service, he is entitled to be granted the benefits of the Government Resolution dated 17.10.1988. 5. Mr. Bhunesh C. Rupera, learned advocate for the petitioner has submitted that a co-ordinate Bench of this Court has rendered a judgment dated 06.01.2014 in Special Civil Application No. 515 of 2012 directing the State Government to examine the cases of the petitioners therein as per the directions issued by the Supreme Court in State of Gujarat and others v. PWD Employees Union reported in 2013(8) SCALE 579 and take a decision within four months from the receipt of a copy of the judgment. At that point of time, the State Government had filed a review petition in the Supreme Court against the judgment in State of Gujarat and others v. PWD Employees Union (Supra). However, the said review application has now been dismissed by an order dated 29.01.2014 passed in Review Petition (C) Nos. 2826 and 2827 of 2013 in Civil Appeal Nos. 5321- 5322 of 2013. Hence, there is now no impediment in the way of the State Government in extending the benefits of Government Resolution dated 17.10.1988, to the petitioners. 6. Mr. D.M. Devnani, learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that in view of the judgment of the Supreme Court, the respondents may be directed to examine the case of the petitioner so as to ascertain his entitlement to the benefits flowing from the Government Resolution dated 17.10.1988. 7. This Court has heard learned counsel for the respective parties and considered the material on record. The petition is squarely covered by the judgment of the Supreme Court in State of Gujarat and others v. PWD Employees Union (supra). The relevant paragraphs of the judgment are quoted hereinbelow: "25. As per scheme contained in Resolution dated 17th October, 1988 all the daily wage workers were not entitled for regularization or permanency in the services. As per the said Resolution the daily wagers are entitled to the following benefits: (i) They are entitled to daily wages as per the prevailing Daily Wages. As per scheme contained in Resolution dated 17th October, 1988 all the daily wage workers were not entitled for regularization or permanency in the services. As per the said Resolution the daily wagers are entitled to the following benefits: (i) They are entitled to daily wages as per the prevailing Daily Wages. If there is presence of more than 240 days in first year, daily wagers are eligible for paid Sunday, medical allowance and national festival holidays. (ii) Daily wagers and semi skilled workers who has service of more than five years and less than 10 years are entitled for fixed monthly salary along with dearness allowance as per prevailing standard, for his working days. Such daily wagers will get two optional leave in addition to 14 misc. leave, Sunday leave and national festival holidays. Such daily wagers will also be eligible for getting medical allowance and deduction of provident fund. (iii) Daily wagers and semi skilled workers who has service of more than ten years but less than 15 years are entitled to get minimum pay scale at par with skilled worker along with dearness allowance as per prevailing standard, for his working days. Moreover, such daily wagers will get two optional leave in addition to 14 misc. leave, Sunday leave and national festival holidays. He/she will be eligible for getting medical allowance and deduction of provident fund. (iv) Daily wagers and semi skilled workers who has service of more than 15 years will be considered as permanent worker and such semi skilled workers will get current pay scale of skilled worker along with dearness allowance, local city allowance and house rent allowance. They will get benefit as per the prevailing rules of gratuity, retired salary, general provident fund. Moreover, they will get two optional leave in addition to 14 misc. leave, 30 days earned leave, 20 days half pay leave, Sunday leave and national festival holidays. The daily wage workers and semi skilled who have completed more than 15 years of their service will get one increment, two increments for 20 years service and three increments for 25 years in the current pay scale of skilled workers and their salary will be fixed accordingly. 26. The daily wage workers and semi skilled who have completed more than 15 years of their service will get one increment, two increments for 20 years service and three increments for 25 years in the current pay scale of skilled workers and their salary will be fixed accordingly. 26. Considering, the facts and circumstances of the case, the finding of Gujarat High Court dated 29th October, 2010 in SCA No. 8647/2008 and connected matters and the fact that the said judgment is binding between the parties, we are of the view that the appellants should be directed to grant the benefit of the scheme as contained in the Resolution dated 17th October, 1988 to all the daily wage workers of the Forest and Environment Department working for more than five years, providing them the benefits as per our finding at Paragraph 25 above. The appellants are directed accordingly. The judgment and order passed by the learned Single Judge dated 29th October, 2010 as affirmed by the Division Bench by its order dated 28th February, 2012 stands modified to the extent above. The benefit should be granted to the eligible daily wage workers of the Forest and Environment Department working for more than five years including those who are performing work other than building maintenance and repairing but they will be entitled for the consequential benefit w.e.f. 29th October, 2010 or subsequent date from which they are so eligible within four months from the date of receipt/production of the copy of this order. The appeals stand disposed of with the aforesaid observation and directions to the appellant-State and its authorities. There shall be no separate orders as to costs." 8. The Review Petitions filed by the State Government against this judgment have now been dismissed by the Supreme Court, vide order dated 29.01.2014. In the view of this Court, there remains no impediment at all, on the part of the State Government in extending the benefits of the Government Resolution dated 17.10.1988, to the petitioner subject to his fulfilling the requisite conditions. 9. In view of the above, the following order is passed: "The respondents shall examine the case of the petitioner and, if found eligible, shall extend the benefits of the Government Resolution dated 17.10.1988 to him, as per the directions of the Supreme Court. 9. In view of the above, the following order is passed: "The respondents shall examine the case of the petitioner and, if found eligible, shall extend the benefits of the Government Resolution dated 17.10.1988 to him, as per the directions of the Supreme Court. The needful be done within a period of four months from the date of the receipt of a copy of this order." 10. The petition is allowed, to the above extent. Rule is made absolute, accordingly. 11. Direct service is permitted. Petition Partly Allowed.