Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2015 DIGILAW 565 (MAD)

Radha Agarwal v. Corporation of Chennai, Rep. By its Commissioner, Ripon Buildings, Chennai

2015-02-02

M.VENUGOPAL, SATISH K.AGNIHOTRI

body2015
Judgment Satish K. Agnihotri, J. 1. With the consent of the learned counsel on either side, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself. 2. This writ petition is filed seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents herein to remove the lock and seal forthwith, to enable the petitioners to rectify the deviations in the constructions put up at Door No. 97, Astabujam Road, Choolai, Chennai 600 112, on the basis of their representation. 3. The petitioners are the joint owners of the premises situated at D.No. 97, Astabujam Road, Choolai, Chennai 600 112. They applied and obtained sanction for construction of stilt cum ground floor + two floors from the respondents and put up construction accordingly. While putting up construction, some additions and alterations were made within the approvable limit. Pending regularisation with regard to additions and alterations, locking and sealing notice dated 6.4.2013 was issued and the respondents had sealed the premises on 20.1.2015. Though notice was issued in the year 2013, there was no action for more than two years by the respondents. As the stocks, office materials and perishable goods, which belonged to other tenants are inside the building, immediately, on 21.1.2015, the petitioners made representation to the first respondent to remove the lock and seal, atlease for the approved floors and also agreed to rectify the deviations. The respondents had refused to deseal the premises. Hence, the present writ petition. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are ready and willing to rectify the deviations for the purpose of restoring the building to its original position in terms of the planning permission granted by the Corporation. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioners are given liberty to make an application before the first respondent with a request to permit them to demolish the unauthorised structure. In case, any such application is given, the first respondent is directed to grant permission for the purpose of demolishing the unauthorised structure. The petitioners are granted eight weeks' time to rectify the deviations. After the petitioners demolish the unauthorised structure, the first respondent shall inspect the building once again to confirm as to whether the unauthorised structure has been removed. If it is found that the entire unauthorised structure is removed, the first respondent shall not process the matter further. The petitioners are granted eight weeks' time to rectify the deviations. After the petitioners demolish the unauthorised structure, the first respondent shall inspect the building once again to confirm as to whether the unauthorised structure has been removed. If it is found that the entire unauthorised structure is removed, the first respondent shall not process the matter further. In case, the unauthorized structure is not removed within the time given, the first respondent is permitted to take further action, in accordance with law. 6. The writ petition is disposed of with the above directions. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed.