JUDGMENT Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. (Oral) Heard Mr. Mohd. Safdar, Advocate present for the applicant, Ms. Mamta Joshi, Brief Holder present for the State and Mr. Bharat Tiwari, Advocate present for the respondent No.2. 2. A first information report was lodged against the present applicants by respondent no. 2 under Sections 452/323/324 of I.P.C. The applicants are already on bail in the aforesaid Sections but thereafter another Section 308 IPC was added in the investigation by the police and the charge-sheet has been filed against the present applicants under Sections 452/323/324/308 of I.P.C. Consequently, the learned Magistrate took cognizance in the matter and the present applicants have been summoned. 3. Against the summoning order, applicants approached this Court by filing an application invoking inherent power of this Court under Section 482 CrPC for quashing the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.1795 of 2015 which is pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Roorkee, District Haridwar. 4. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. was disposed of by this Court vide order dated 30.09.2015 wherein this Court did not interfere with the matter and directed the applicants to move their bail application before the court below which shall be considered as far as possible on the same day itself on the merits of the case. 2 5. Learned counsel for the respondent No.2 has moved a Recall application alongwith a Delay condonation application praying that the order dated 30.09.2015, passed by this Court, be recalled and delay in filing the same may be condoned. 6. The recall application is totally misconceived as the recall of the order dated 30.09.2015 would amount to altering the order which is barred by Section 362 Cr.P.C. The recall application is hereby rejected.