JUDGMENT : I.P. Mukerji, J. On 16th December, 2006 a notice was published in the newspaper inviting applications from candidates for appointment in one post of additional para teacher (male) in physical education at Nawpukhuria J.J. High School situated within the jurisdiction of Kapasdanga Gram Panchayat in Murshidabad. The petitioner claims to be a resident of the area covered by this gram panchayat. The said notice inviting applications stipulated that a candidate must be a resident of that area. 2. The petitioner qualified in the initial round of selection and was placed in a panel comprising of two persons. Kamalesh Mondal got the first position and the petitioner got the second. This panel was approved by the District Project Officer Sarva Shiksha Mission on 3rd January, 2007. 3. Kamalesh Mondal has not been made a party. 4. The writ petitioner challenges his appointment on the ground that he did not reside within the jurisdiction of the said gram panchayat as belonged to Beldanga Municipal Corporation area. Furthermore, it is stated that the selection process was arbitrary. 5. This post of additional para teacher is contractual in nature. It is for a period of one year at a time. 6. Considering the affidavits filed by the respondent no. 3, the District Project Officer and the Head Master of the school, it appears that no effect was given to the selection process. Kamalesh Mondal was not appointed as an additional para teacher. 7. Furthermore, by a decision dated 9th June, 2010 the Department of School Education abolished the post of additional para teacher in physical education at the said school. There is no post of additional para teacher any more. 8. Moreover, the duration of the panel was for one year and it has long lapsed. 9. Hence, the petitioner has failed to establish a right to be appointed an additional para teacher in the said school. Far less she has been able to show that the right is still subsisting. 10. There is no way in which this court can help the writ petitioner. 11. This writ application [W.P. 1354 (W) of 2007] is accordingly dismissed. 12. Connected application (CAN 2227 of 2015) does not deserve consideration either and is hereby also dismissed.