JUDGMENT Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel, J. The grievance which has been made by the petitioner is that though an order under Section 122-B of the Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 was passed on 31 March 1998 against the fifth to tenth respondents for unauthorized occupation on public utility land, no action has been taken to enforce the said order. The petitioner has also pleaded that the revision filed against the order under Section 122-B was dismissed on 26 September 2000 and the fifth respondent had also filed a suit before the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Ballia, being Civil Suit No.362 of 1998 in which an interim injunction was refused. 2. In our opinion, the allegations which have been made by the petitioner merit a serious enquiry in the event there is a substance in the grievance that despite an order under Section 122-B of the competent statutory authority, the same is not being enforced under Rule 115-E of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Rules, 1952. We, accordingly, direct that the second respondent, shall duly verify as to whether the order under Section 122-B continues to hold the field or whether it has been modified or set aside by any superior forum. This verification shall be completed with due notice to all the affected parties. Thereafter, subject to the verification, if it is found that the order under Section 122-B continues to remain in force, necessary action shall be taken in accordance with law by invoking the procedure under Rule 115-E of the Rules, 1952 to secure compliance expeditiously. 3. The petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.