Research › Search › Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court · body

2015 DIGILAW 626 (MP)

Sourav Singh Sikarwar v. State of M. P.

2015-06-18

SHEEL NAGU

body2015
ORDER 1. The applicants apprehend their arrest in connection with Crime No.19/2015 registered at P. S Tetra, District- Morena for the offence punishable under sections 147, 148, 323, 294, 504B of IPC read with section 3(1) (x) of the SC and ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. 2. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that applicants have been falsely implicated in the case due to political rivalry. Even case under the SC and ST Act has not been made out against the applicants. The applicants are ready to co-operate in the investigation and trial. They are reputed citizens of the locality, in the event of arrest their reputation will be tarnished, therefore, they be released on anticipatory bail. 3. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the application. 4. I have perused the case diary. 5. On due consideration of the contentions raised by the learned counsel for the parties and overall facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the considered view that it is a fit case to enlarge the applicants on anticipatory bail, therefore, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this application is allowed, but with certain stringent conditions in view of pendency of trial. 6. It is directed that in the event of arrest, applicants shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of arresting officer. 7. This order will remain operative subject to compliance of the following conditions by the applicants :- 1. The applicants will comply with all the terms and conditions of the bonds executed by them; 2. The applicants will cooperate in the investigation/trial, as the case may be; 3. The applicants will not indulge themselves in extending inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the Police Officer, as the case may be; 4. The applicants shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which they are accused; 5. The applicants will not seek unnecessary adjournments during the trial; and 6. The applicants will not leave India without previous permission of the trial Court/Investigating Officer, as the case may be. 7. The applicants shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which they are accused; 5. The applicants will not seek unnecessary adjournments during the trial; and 6. The applicants will not leave India without previous permission of the trial Court/Investigating Officer, as the case may be. 7. The applicants shall appear and mark their attendance once in a week before the police station concerned till conclusion of investigation, failing which, this bail order shall stand cancelled automatically without further reference to this Court. 8. A copy of this order be sent to the police station concerned as well as Court concerned for compliance.