JUDGMENT M. JAICHANDREN, J. 1. At this stage of the hearing of the Habeas Corpus Petition, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondents had submitted that the detention order, dated 7.6.2014, passed by the second respondent, had been revoked by a Government order in G.O. Rt. No. 3506, Home, Prohibition & Excise (X) Department, dated 18.7.2014. Hence, the Habeas Corpus Petition may be dismissed as infructuous. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner had not refuted the said statement made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondents. 3. Recording the said submission made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondents, the Habeas Corpus Petition stands closed.