JUDGMENT SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI, J. 1. Both writ appeals arise from the common order dated 18.11.2014 passed in W.P. Nos. 25114 and 25621 of 2014. 2. The writ petitioners participated for selection on the post of Assistant Professors in the Government Arts and Science Colleges under the Tamil Nadu Collegiate Educational Service for the year 2012, pursuant to the notification published on 28.5.2013. After having participated unsuccessfully, the writ petitioners questioned the norms fixed for selection process. 3. It is not in dispute that the norms were fixed in the notification as well as in the Government Order, which prescribed marks for the interview. The writ petitioners did not question the validity of the notification and the relevant orders before participating in the selection process. After having failed in the selection process, the writ petitioners have come up with the writ petitions. 4. The learned Single Judge have rejected the writ petitions on two grounds, firstly, the petitioners cannot be permitted to question the methodology adopted in awarding marks in the interview after participation in the selection process. On the question of merit also, it was examined and found that there was no arbitrariness in the selection process. 5. We have examined both cases carefully. Indisputably, the notification was issued on the basis of the Government Order, which clearly provides selection process and also the methodology to be adopted in awarding marks for the interview. The writ petitioners, having participated in the process, are rightly not permitted to raise the issue, at this stage. On merit also, it is not found that there was any unreasonable arbitrariness in the process. We do not find any reason to take contrary view to that of the learned Writ Court. 6. Accordingly, both writ appeals are dismissed. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.