ORDER 1. This is a petition, under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short the Code). The petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 15.9.2011, passed by CJM, Satna in Criminal Case No.3643/2009 whereby charges of the offences punishable under section 498A read with 34 of the IPC and section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 were framed against them and their son. 2. Petitioners are respectively parents-in-law of respondent No.1 whose marriage was solemnized with Mohd. Javed on 12.12.2003. Allegations against them, in short, are that only four months after the marriage, they has started subjecting respondent No.1 to cruelty and harassment while demanding an additional sum of Rs.2 lacs in dowry and thereafter, continued to harass her till the date of lodging the FIR due to non-satisfaction of the demand. 3. The FIR contains no allegation whatsoever against petitioner No.2 as to demand of dowry. Further, in her statement on oath, with reference to an application under section 125 of the Code, the respondent No.1 has clearly admitted that after the marriage, she had resided with the petitioners respectively aged about 65 and 62 years, who also happen to be parents-in-law of her elder sister, for a period of three months only. 4. Taking into consideration the admissions made by the respondent No.1 and the recitals of the FIR, the cade against the petitioner falls within categories (5) and (7) of the cases, attracting interference under the inherent powers as enumerated in State of Haryana v. Bhajanlal [ AIR 1992 SC 604 ]. 5. Accordingly, the petition stands allolwed and the order framing charge, so far as it related to the petitioners, is set aside and the proceedings in Criminal Case No.3643/2009 (above), as against them, are hereby quashed.