JUDGMENT 1. - This second appeal filed by the plaintiff-landlord is arising out of the judgment and decree dated 13.08.2008 by the learned Additional District Judge, Sujangarh, District Churu in Civil Appeal Decree No.22/2007 "Mool Chand v. Gandhi Aashram, Sujangarh " who dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant-plaintiff and affirmed the judgment and decree dated 25.01.1994 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Sujangarh in Civil Original Suit No.19/1989 "Mool Chand v. Gandhi Aashram, Sujangarh " by which, the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) had dismissed the suit filed by the plaintiff-Mool Chand seeking eviction of the defendant and for recovery of the due rent for the period from 01.01.1987 to 31.01.1989 amounting to Rs. 3,125/- in relation to the suit shop situated at Station Road, Sujangarh. 2. The present second appeal has been filed by the appellant, who was the plaintiff before the learned Courts below, against the concurrent rejection of his claim, as aforesaid. 3. After framing of the relevant issues arising out of the plaint and written statement and after recording of the evidence, the learned Trial Court had dismissed the suit of the plaintiff-Mool Chand on 25.01.1994 on the ground of plaintiff having failed to prove the default in payment of rent. 3. After framing of the relevant issues arising out of the plaint and written statement and after recording of the evidence, the learned Trial Court had dismissed the suit of the plaintiff-Mool Chand on 25.01.1994 on the ground of plaintiff having failed to prove the default in payment of rent. The relevant portions of the discussion and the final order made by the learned Trial Court are quoted herein below for ready reference:- eSaus i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;kA nksuksa i{kdkjku dh cgl lquhA izdj.k esa fookn 1-1-1987 ls 31-1-1989 rd ds fdjk, ds lEcU/k esa gSA blds lEcU/k esa Mh0MCY;w0 1 lqHkk"k csnh viuh ftjg esa Lohdkj djrk gS fd 1-1-1987 ls 31-12-1987 rd ds fdjk, dk euhvkMZj Hkstk FkkA mldh jlhn o dwiu i=koyh esa ugha gSaA 1-1-1988 ls 31-12-1988 rd fdjk, dk Hkh euhvkMZj Hkstk FkkA mldh jlhn o dwiu i=koyh eas ugha gSA ;g fdjk;k oknh dks dc Vs.Mj fd;k] rkjh[k ;kn ugha gSA mlls Li"V gS fd 1-1-1987 ls 31-12-1988 fd ds fdjk, ds lEcU/k esa izfroknh us oknh dks dksbZ euhvkMZj ugha fd;k vkSj u gh uksfVl HkstkA i=koyh ds voyksdu ls ;g Hkh Li"V gksrk gSA fd 1-1- 1989 ls 31 -12-1989 rd dk fdjk;k tfj, euhvkMZj dwiu izn'kZ ,&6 o izn'kZ ,&7 izfroknh us Hkstk FkkA ugha ysus ij tek djok;kA cSad [kkrk uEcj crkus gsrq uksfVl fn;k Fkk] ftldh jlhn izn'kZ ,&8 gSA ,0Mh0 izn'kZ ,&1 gSA euhvkMZj bUdkjh dk vly dwiu izn'kZ ,&9 o izn'kZ ,&10 rFkk izn'kZ ,&11 o izn'kZ ,&12 gSA rFkk 1-1-1987 ls 31-12-1987 rd dk fdjk;k tek djokus ds izkFkZuk&i= dh uDy izn'kZ ,&13 gSA 1-1- 1989 ls 30 -6-1989 rd ds fdjk, dk uksfVl fn;k] ftldh uDy izn'kZ ,&14 gSA uksfVl izfroknh dks fey x;k] tks vly izn'kZ ,&2 gSA rFkk i=koyh dk voyksdu djus ls Li"V gS fd izn'kZ ,&3 ls izn'kz ,&5 fnukad 1-1-1987 ls 31-12-1989 rdk dk fdjk;k dksVZ esa tek djokus ds Vs.Mj dh jlhn gSA rFkk Mh0MCY;w 2 pUnzflag dh ftjg esa Lohdkj djrk gS fd eSaus fdjk, dk euhvkMZj ugha djok;kA fdjk;k dksVZ esa tek gksrk gSA ;g ckr lqHkk"kth us crkbZ\ blls Li"V gS fd izfroknh ;g lkfcr djus esa vlQy jgk gS fd mlus 1-1-1987 ls 31-12-1988 rd ds fdjk, ds lEcU/k esa oknh dks dksbZ euhvkMZj djok;k ;k mlus cSad [kkrk uEcj crkus ds lEcU/k esa fu;ekuqlkj uksfVl fn;kA ysfdu i=koyh dk voyksdu djus ls ;g Hkh Li"V gksrk gS fd nksuksa i{kdkjku esa blh U;k;ky; esa blh fookfnr nqdku dks fjDr djokus ds lEcU/k esa iwoZ esa Hkh eqdnek uEcj 24@83 ewypUn cuke xka/kh vkJe] pyk gS] ftlesa blh U;k;ky; us fnukad 11-9-1986 dks izfroknh dks izFke pwddrkZ ?kksf"kr fd;k gSA nksuksa i{kdkjku ;g Hkh Lohdkj djrs gSa fd bl fu.kZ; ds f[kykQ izfroknh us vihy dh ,oa ftldk vihyh; fu.kZ; vHkh bUgha fnuksa gqvk gSA blls Li"V gS fd tc rd vihy dk fu.kZ; ugha gks tkrk] ewy izdj.k dk Qslyk ykxw ugha djok;k tk ldrk ,oa oknh dk okn&i= ds iSjk la[;k 3 esa Hkh dFku gS fd okn la[;k 24@83 esa U;k;ky; esa /kkjk 13@3 jktLFkku jsUV dUV~ksy ,DV 1950 ds vUrxZr izksfotuy jSV r; Qjek;kA rFkk i=koyh dk voyksdu djus ls Hkh ;g Li"V gS fd izfroknh lu~ 1984 ls yxkrkj U;k;ky; esa gh fdjk;k tek djokrk vk jgk gSA ,slh n'kk esa tSlk fd izfroknh }kjk izLrqr vkj0,y0MCyw0 1974 ist 115 esa Hkh vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k x;k gS fd & fdjk,nkj dks izR;sd ekg ekfyd dks fdjk;k Vs.Mj djus dh vko';drk ugha gS og U;k;ky; esa fdjk;k tek djok ldrk gS ;fn ekfyd us ,d ckj bUdkj dj fn;k gSA i=koyh dk voyksdu djus ls Li"V gS fd izfroknh lu~ 1987 ls igys ls gh fdjk;k Vs.Mj ls dksVZ esa tek djok jgk gSA blls Li"V gS fd izfroknh dks lu~ 87 esa oknh dks fdjk, dh jkf'k Vs.Mj djus ;k euhvkMZj ls Hkstus vFkok cSad [kkrk uEcj crkus ds lEcU/k esa uksfVl nsus dh vko';drk ugha gS] D;ksafd og igys ls gh U;k;ky; esa fdjk;s dh jkf'k tek djokrk vk jgk gSA blds vykok tSlk fd izfroknh }kjk izLrqr uthj vkj0lh0ts0 1993 ist 315 jkt0 gkbZdksVZ esa Hkh ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k x;k gA fd vihy ds nkSjku izdj.k dks pkyw ekuk tkrk gSA bl dkj.k ;g ugha dgk tk ldrk gS fd iwoZ esa ewy izjd.k dk Qslyk gks tkus ds dkj.k] og [kRe gks x;k D;ksafd mldh vihy yfEcr Fkh vkSj tc rd ml izdj.k gh vihy yfEcr gksrh gS rc rd ewy izdj.k ds Qslys dks ykxw ugha djok;k tk ldrkA bl izdkj vihy ds nkSjku izdj.k dks pkyw ekuk tkrk gSA blls Li"V gS fd izfroknh dks iqu% fdjk;k Vs.Mj djus ;k euhvkMZj ls Hkstus dh vko';drk ugha gS vkSj u gh mls ekfyd dks cSad [kkrk uEcj crkus gsrq uksfVl nsus dh vko';drk gSA tSlh og iwoZ esa U;k;ky; esa fdjk;k tek djokrk vk jgk gS] oSls gh tek djok ldrk gS] D;ksafd bl izdj.k esa izfroknh 1987 ls igys U;k;ky; esa fdjk;k tek djokrk vk jgk gS] ,slh n'kk esa 1987 esa tc izfroknh us U;k;ky; esa fdjk;k tek djok;k rc iwoZ izdj.k dh vihy ds nkSjku iwoZ eqdnek pkyw ekuk tk;sxk] bl dkj.k izfroknh }kjk U;k;ky; esa tek djok;k x;k fdjk;k voS/k ;k vuqfpr ugha dgk tk ldrkA blh izdkj izfroknh }kjk izLrqr 1993 ( 2 ) vkj0lh0lh0 ist 94 esa ekuuh; jkt0 mPp U;k;ky; us vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k gS fd ;fn fdjk,nkj 19, ( 3 ) jkt0 ifjlj ( fdjk;k fu;a=.k ,oa csn[kyh ) vf/kfu;e] 1950 dh ikyu esa pwd djrk gS] rks mls fdjk;k Hkqxrku dh pwd ds dj.k csn[kyh dk mRrjnk;h ekuk tk;sxkA mijksDr uthj esa ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; us bldk ukdkjkRed mRrj fn;k gSA blh dkj.k ,0vkbZ0vkj0 1980 lqizhe dksV ist 954 is'k dh xbZ gS] ysfdu mDr :fyax rF;ksa dh fHkUurk o ,DV dh fHkUurk }kjk izLrqr 1991 ( 1 ) vkj0,l0vkj0 ist 253 esa vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k x;k gS fd ;fn fdjk,nkj iwoZorhZ csn[kyh ds okn ds vkns'kkuqlkj fdjk;k U;k;ky; esa tek djokrk vk jgk gS] blds i'pkr~ U;k;ky; esa /kkjk 19, dh nj[okLr ds rgr] tek djokrk gS rks fdjk,nkj ds lEcU/k esa ;g ugha dgk tk ldrk fd mlus 6 ekg ;k mlls T;knk vof/k dk fdjk;k nwljs oknh dh nk;jh ds le; cdk;k gSaA blds vykok 1974 Mcyw0,y0,u0 270 esa Hkh ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k x;k gS fd fdjk,nkj dks izR;sd ckj fdjk, dh jkf'k Vs.Mj djus dh vko';drk ugha gS] ;fn ,d ckj ekfyd fdjk;k ysus ls bUdkj dj nsrk gS rks fdjk;snkj U;k;ky; esa fdjk;k 19, ds rgr tek djok ldrk gSA ,oa bl izdj.k esa fdjk,nkj U;k;ky; esa fdjk;k lu~ 1987 ls Hkh iwoZ ls iwoZ izdj.k ds vkns'kkuqlkj tek djok jgk gS ,oa bl izdj.k ds nk;jh ds le; iwoZ izdj.k dh vihy U;k;ky; esa yfEcr FkhA bl izdkj iwoZ izdj.k dks [kRe gksuk ugha ekuk tk ldrk vkSj mlh ds vuqlj.k esa fdjk,nkj U;k;ky; esa fdjk;k tek djok ldrk gS ,oa izR;sd o"kZ dss fdjk, ds lEcU/k esa mls izR;sd ckj ekfyd dks fdjk;k euhvkMZj ls Hkstus] Vs.Mj djus dh vko';drk ugha gS vkSj u gh cSad [kkrk uEcj ds lEcU/k esa uksfVl nsus dh vko';drk gSA blds vykok izfroknh iwoZ izdj.k ds vkns'k ds vuqlkj fdjk;k U;k;ky; esa tek djok jgk gS rks ;g ugha dgk tk ldrk fd mlus 6 ekg ;k mlls vf/kd vof/k dk fdjk;k bl izdj.k ds nk;jh ds le; cdk;k gks x;k gSA blds vykok tc rd fd iwoZ izdj.k dh vihy dk fuLrkj.k u gks tk;s] ml izdj.k dks pkyw ekuk tkrk gSA ,slh n'kk esa iwoZ izdj.k ds vkns'kkuqlkj U;k;ky; esa fdjk;k tek djok;k tk ldrk gSA izR;sd ckj fdjk,nkj dks fdjk;k Vs.Mj djus ;k euhvkMZj Hkstus dh vko';drk ugha gSA og U;k;ky; esa fdjk;k tek djok ldrk gSA tcfd blds foijhr oknh }kjk izLrqr :fyaxs vkj0,y0MCY;w0 1988 ( 1 ) ist 343 o vkj0,y0MCY;w0 1992 ( 2 ) ist 651 rF;ksa dh fHkUurk ds dkj.k ykxw ugha gksrh] D;ksafd nksuksa gh izdj.kksa esa ;g ugha fy[kk gS fd fdjk,nkj ,oa ekfyd ds e/; iwoZ esa csn[kyh ds lEcU/k esa oknh pyk ;k ugha rFkk f}rh; csn[kyh ds izdj.k ds le; iwoZ izdj.k dh vihy py jgh Fkh ;k ughaA blls Li"V gS fd bl izdj.k esa ;g ugha dgk tk ldrk fd izfroknh us oknh dks 1-1-1987 ls 31-12-1988 rd dk tks fdjk;k cxSj lwpuk ds U;k;ky; esa tek djok;k gS] og voS/k gS D;ksafd bl izdj.k ds nk;jh ds le; nksuksa gh i{kdkjksa ds e/; iwoZ izdj.k dh vihy yfEcr FkhA ,slh n'kk esa izfroknh iwoZorhZ izdj.k ds vkns'k ds vuqlkj gh U;k;ky; esa fdjk;k 1987 ls igys ls gh yxkrkj Vs.Mj ls tek djokrk vk jgk gSA ,slh n'kk esa izfroknh ds fy;s mijksDr uthjksa ds vuqlkj vko';d ugha gS fd og izR;sd ckj oknh vFkok ekfyd dks fdjk;k euhvkMZj ls Hksts ;k cSad [kkrk uEcj ds lEcU/k esa uksfVl nsaA bl dkj.k ;g ugha dgk tk ldrk fd izfroknh us oknh dks cxSj lwpuk fn;s] tks fdjk;k U;k;ky; esa tek djok;k gS] og voS/k gSA bl izdkj oknh rudh la[;k 2 dks vius i{k esa lkfcr djus esa vlQy jgk gSA ifj.kkeLo:i rudh la[;k 2 dk fu.kZ; oknh ds f[kykQ fd;k tkrk gSA vkns'k vr% oknh fo:) izfroknh ckcr izkfIr p<+k fdjk;k 3]125@& :i;s fnukad 1-1-1987 ls 31-1-1989 rd dk ,oa fjDr djkus nqdku okds LVs'ku jksM+] lqtkux<+ leLr izdkj ds izek.kksa ds vk/kkj ij] [kkfjt fd;k tkrk gSA lkFk gh oknh dks vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd izfroknh dks okn&O; iznku djsaA fu;ekuqlkj fMdzh ipkZ cuk;s tkus dk vkns'k fd;k tkrk gSA sd/- pUnzdqekj lksuxjk ) U;k;ky; eaqflQ ,oa U;kf;d eftLVs~V izFke oxZ] lqtkux<+ ( pq: ) jktLFkku " 4. Being aggrieved by the judgment and decree aforesaid dated 25.01.1994, the plaintiff-Mool Chand filed the first appeal before the First Appellate Court of learned Additional District Judge, Sujangarh, District Churu namely, Appeal Decree No.22/2007 (28/1994) "Mool Chand v. Gandhi Aashram, Sujangarh " which was also dismissed on 13.08.2008, while affirming the impugned judgment and decree dated 25.01.1994 of the learned Trial Court. The relevant portion of the discussion and the final order made by the learned First Appellate Court for affirming the judgment and decree of the learned Trial Court is quoted herein below for ready reference:- ;g fufoZokn gS fd iwoZ okn 24@83 ds /kkjk 13 ( 3 ) mDr vf/kfu;e ds vUrxZr fdjk;k fu/kkZj.k gksus ds ckn ls okn ds fu.kZ; rd izfroknh ml okn ds vUrxZr fdjk;k tek djokrk Fkk rFkk bl okn ds fopkj.k ds nkSjku izfroknh }kjk iwoZ okn ds fu.kZ; ds fo:) vihy dh x;h Fkh tks yfEcr FkhA ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; ds fofu.kZ; f'konRr tfM+;k cuke xaxknsoh ls iwoZ ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; ds eq[; ihB ds fofu.kZ; j?kqukFkflag cuke fodze 'kekZ mDr esa fLFkfr ;g Fkh fd /kkjk 13 ( 3 ) ] ( 4 ) ] ( 5 ) mDr vf/kfu;e ds izko/kku dsoy okn esa gh ykxw gksrs gSa] vihy esa ykxw ugha gksrsA rFkk okn ds fu.kZ; ds i'pkr~ fdjk;snkj /kkjk 13 ( 4 ) mDr vf/kfu;e ds vUrxZr fdjk;k tek djkus ds ck/; ugha Fkk ijUrq ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; ds mDr fofu.kZ; f'konRr tfM+;k cuke xaxknsoh mDr esa ;g ekuk fd vihy Hkh okn dh fujUrjrk gS rFkk vihy ds yafcr jgs Hkh /kkjk 13 ( 3 ) ] ( 4 ) ] ( 5 ) mDr vf/kfu;e ds izko/kku ykxw gksrs gSaA ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; us vius bl fofu.kZ; esa jktLFkku esa bl fof/kd fLFkfr esa vkewy&pwy ifjorZu ds dkj.k iSnk gksus okyh isphanfx;ksa o fdjk;snkjksa ds fgrksa ij gksus okys vk|kr dks /;ku esa j[kk gS rFkk fofu.kZ; ds iSjk la[;k 9 esa lko/kkuh dh fVIi.kh] dh gS fd mDr ekeys dh lquokbZ ds nkSjku ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; ds de:nhu cuke okfgnvyh 1987 ( 1 ) vkj0,y0vkj0 290] Hkh Kku esa yk;k x;k gS ftlesa ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k x;k fd vihy ds yafcr jgrs /kkjk 13 dh ikyuk vko';d ugha gS rFkk bl fofu.kZ; esa blls fHkUu er fy;k x;k gSA vr% fdjk;snkjksa dks yafcr vihyksa esa gksus okyh dfBukbZ;ksa dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, Li"V fd;k tkrk gS fd vihy esa yafcr jgrs /kkjk 13 ( 4 ) mDr vf/kfu;e dh ikyuk ugha djus ij /kkjk 13 ( 5 ) mDr vf/kfu;e ds vUrxZr izfrj{kk dk vf/kdkj lekIr djus ls iwoZ vihy U;k;ky; bl fofu.kZ; dh ikyuk djus gsrq fdjk;snkj dks leqfpr volj nsxk rFkk bl fofu.kZ; ls iwoZ esa fu.khZr ekeys iqu% jhvksiu ugha fd;s tkosaxsA ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; dh lko/kkuh dh mDr fVIi.kh bl vihy esa mRiUu gj iz'u dk mRrj nsrh gSA ;ksX; vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ ls dsljhey cuke Hkokuhflag ( mDr ) U;k; n'"Vkar dk gokyk nsdj rdZ fn;k gS fd iwoZ okn ds fu.kZ; ds okn U;k;ky; esa fdjk;k tek djkus ls iwoZ izfroknh dks pkfg, Fkk fd /kkjk 19, mDr vf/kfu;e ds vUrxZr ;g ( izfroknh ) ] oknh dks euhvkMZj ls fdjk;k Hkstrk tks ysus ls bUdkjh dh n'kk esa cSad [kkrk la[;k iwNus dk uksfVl nsrk rFkk blds i'pkr~ gh og fdjk;k U;k;ky; esa tek djok ldrk FkkA bldh ikyuk fd, fcuk tek djok;k x;k fdjk;k fof/k lEer vnk;xh ugha gSA mDr U;k; n'"Vkar dk lknj voyksdu fd;kA bl U;k; n'"VkUr esa ;g iz'u fopkj.kh; ugha Fkk fd okn ds fu.kZ; ds i'pkr izfroknh dk nkf;Ro Fkk fd euhvkMZj o uksfVl Hkstus ds ckn gh U;k;ky; esa fdjk;k tek djokrk] cfYd iz'u ;g Fkk ds fu.kZ; ds i'pkr~ vihy yafcr jgrs izfroknh us vihyh; U;k;ky; dh vuqefr ls ml U;k;ky; esa vihy esa fdjk;k tek djok fn;k FkkA oknh dk rdZ Fkk fd fdjk;k euhvkMZj }kjk Hksts tkus ;k cSad [kkrs ds uksfVl ds ckn /kkjk 19, ds vUrxZr tek gksuk pkfg, FkkA ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; us ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; ds f'konRr tfM+;k cuke xaxknsoh ( mDr ) ds ekeys dks vuqdj.k djrs gq, vihyh; U;k;ky; esa tks fdjk;k tek gqvk Fkk] mls fof/k lEer fdjk;k ekuk rFkk fu/kkZfjr fd;k fd fdjk;snkj ls vis{kk ugha dh tk ldrh fd og nks ckj fdjk;k tek djok;sA ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; ds mDr f'konRr tfM+;k ds ekeys ds ckn fLFkfr Li"V gS fd izfroknh dks vihy ds yafcr jgu rd /kkjk 13 ( 4 ) mDr vf/kfu;e dh ikyuk djuh gksxh ijUrq vxj mlus ugha dh gSa rks lko/kkuh dh fVIi.kh ds vuqlkj vihy U;k;ky; dks mDr ikyuk ds fy, izfroknh dks volj nsuk gksxkA bl ekeys esa rks izfroknh us vfxze fdjk;k fopkj.k U;k;ky; esa tek djok fn;k gSA ;ksX; fopkj.k U;k;ky; us izfroknh dks euhvkMZj ugha Hkstus o cSad [kkrs dk uksfVl ugha nsus ds ckotwn vihy ds yafcr jgus ls] U;k;ky; esa tek djok;s x;s fdjk;s dks fof/k lEer ekuk gSA ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; us f'konRr tfM+;k ds ekeys esa izfrikfnr fl)kUr dks ns[krs gq, fook|d la[;k ,d tks bl vihy esa fcUnq la[;k ,d gS] mls izfroknh ds i{k esa r; djus esa dksbZ dkuwuh Hkwy ugha dh gS rFkk bl mRrj ;g gS fd izfroknh us okn esa of.kZr fdjk;k vof/k dk fdjk;k vnk djus esa dksbZ f}rh; pwd ugha dh gSA fcUnq la[;k nks %& bl vihy ds yafcr jgrs oknh&vihykFkhZ us fnukad 7-1-2003 dks /kkjk 13@5 mDr vf/kfu;e dk vkosnu is'k fd;k Fkk ftlesa bl vihy dh izLrqfr fnukad 29-4-1994 ds ckn dk fdjk;k tek ugha djkus ls /kkjk 13@5 mDr vf/kfu;e ds vUrxZr izfrj{kk ds vf/kdkj dks lekIr djus dk fuosnu fd;k FkkA izfroknh & izR;FkhZ dh vksj ls fnukad 1-1-1994 ls 31-12-1994 rd dk vfxze fdjk;k fnukad 9-3-1994 dks U;k;ky; ds Vs.Mj }kjk cSad esa tek djkus] fnukad 1-1-1995 ls 31-12-1995 rd dk fdjk;k Vs.Mj ls 7-2-1995 dks tek djkus] fnukad 1-1-1996 ls 31-12-1996 rd dk fdjk;k fnukad 22-2-1996 dks tek djkus] fnukad 1-1-1997 ls 31-12-1997 rd dk fdjk;k 30-5-1997 dks tek djkus] 1-1- 1998 ls 31 -12-1998 rd dk fdjk;k 21-5-1998 dks tek djkus] 1-1-1999 ls 31-12-1999 rd dk fdjk;k fnukad 18-3-1999 dks tek djkus] fnukad 1-1- 2000 ls 31 -12-2000 rd dk fdjk;k fnukad 28-7-2000 dks tek djkus] 1-1- 2001 ls 31 -12-2001 rd dk fdjk;k fnukad 14-3-2001 dks tek djkus 1-1- 2002 ls 31 -12-2002 rd dk fdjk;k fnukad 14-7-2002 dks tek djkus ds Vs.Mj dh izfr;ka is'k dh gS rFkk 1-1-2003 ls 31-12-2003 rd ds fdjk;s ;k euhvkMZj ysus ls budkjh ds dkj.k okilh dh ikorh dh izfr is'k dh gSA blls iwoZ fnukad 5-1-1989 dks izn'kZ 1 vkSj 3 uksfVl oknh dks viuk cSad [kkrk uacj crkus dk fn;k rFkk 1-1-1989 ls ckn dk fdjk;k euhvkMZj ls Hkstus o ysus ls budkjh dh Mkd jlhn Hkh i=koyh ij gSA ;gka ;g mYys[k djuk lehphu gS fd ftl f}rh; okn dh ;g vihy yafcr gS ml okn la[;k 19@89 esa /kkjk 13 ( 3 ) mDr vf/kfu;e ds vUrxZr fdjk;s dk fu/kkZj.k Hkh ugha gqvk FkkA vc ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; ds fofu.kZ; f'konRr tfM+;k ds ekeys ds ckn fLFkfr bl izdkj gS fd /kkjk 13 ( 4 ) ] ( 5 ) mDr vf/kfu;e ds izko/kku vihy esa ykxw gksrs gSa ijUrq bl vihyk/khu okn esa /kkjk 13 ( 3 ) mDr vf/kfu;e ds vUrxZr fdjk;s dk fu/kkZj.k gh ugha gqvk Fkk rks oknh (Sic- izfroknh ) dh fof/kd ck/;rk ugha Fkh fd og /kkjk 13 ( 4 ) mDr vf/kfu;e ds vUrxZr fdjk;k tek djok;s ,oa tc /kkjk 13 ( 3 ) mDr vf/kfu;e ds vUrxZr fdjk;k fu/kkZfjr gh ugha gqvk rks /kkjk 13 ( 5 ) mDr vf/kfu;e ds izko/kku ykxw ugha gksrsA vxj bl f}rh; okn esa /kkjk 13 ( 3 ) mDr vf/kfu;e ds vUrxZr fdjk;k fu/kkZfjr gksrk rks ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; ds f'konRr tfM+;k ds ekeys ds fl)kUr ds vuq:i vihy ds yafcr jgrs /kkjk 13 ( 5 ) mDr vf/kfu;e ds izko/kku Hkh ykxw gksrs] ijUrq mls n'kk esa Hkh f'konRr tfM+;k ds ekeys esa ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; dh lko/kkuh dh fVIi.k ds vuq:i vihy U;k;ky; dk nkf;Ro crk;k gS fd fdjk;snkj dks bl fu.kZ; dh lwpuk nsrs gq, ikyuk dk mfpr volj fn;k tkos ,oa ml n'kk esa Hkh mls ikyuk dk mfpr volj fn;k tkrkA ijUrq bl ekeys esa rks izfroknh us fdjk;k igys gh tek djok fn;k gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa vihy ds ckn dh vof/k ckcr izfrj{kk dk vf/kdkj lekIr djus dk tks vkosnu is'k fd;k gS] og Lohdkj ;ksX; ugha gS rFkk fcUnq la[;k 2 dk mRrj _.kkRed fn;k tkrk gSA mDr nksuksa fcUnqvksa ds mDr fofu'p;ksa ds vk/kkj ij vihykFkhZ dh vihy [kkfjt ;ksX; gSA vkns'k vihykFkhZ xwypUn }kjk izLrqr ;g vihy [kkfjt dh tkrh gSA ;ksX; flfoy U;k;k/kh'k ( d0[k0 ) ( lqtkux< ) + tks iwoZ esa eqaflQ] lqtkux<+ Fkk ds ewy&flfoy okn la[;k 19@89 ewypan cuke xka/kh vkJe esa fnukad 25-1-1994 dks ikfjr fu.kZ; o fMdzh dh iqf"V dh tkrh gSA ipkZ fMdzh tkjh gksA bl fu.kZ; dh izfr lfgr ;ksX; fopkj.k U;k;ky; dh i=koyh okil Hksth tkosA [kpkZ vihy i{kdkj viuk&viuk ogu djsaxsA Sd/- ( cynsojke pkS/kjh ) vij ftyk U;k;k/kh'k lqtkux<+ ( pq: ) 5. Being aggrieved, the appellant-plaintiff-Mool Chand, now represented by his legal representatives namely Tansukh Rai Rampuria and others, has filed the present second appeal in this Court on 19.11.2008 and the following substantial questions of law were framed by this Court for consideration on 01.04.2015:- "(1) Whether the Courts below were justified in refusing the eviction decree in view of the purported compliance of Section-19A of the Rent Control Act, 1950 by the tenant by payment of rent ? (2) Whether the Courts below were justified in refusing the eviction decree in view of the judgment of this Court in the case of Bulaki Dass S/o Asha Ram Purohit v. Ram Swaroop S/o late Dwarka Dass Rathi reported in 2009 (2) WLC 298 following the Hon'ble Supreme Court judgment in the case of Shiv Dutt Jadia v. Ganga Devi reported in, (2002) 3 SCC 189 ?" 6. The learned counsel Mr. N.L. Joshi appearing for the appellant-plaintiff Mool Chand submitted that the learned Courts below have erred in treating the deposit made by the respondent-defendant during the pendency of the appeal against the judgment dated 11.09.1986 as a valid deposit. It is further submitted that the learned Courts have erred in dismissing the suit of the plaintiff despite having noticed the fact that the defendant having failed to produce the money order receipt pertaining to the year 1987-1988. It is also submitted that both the Courts below have erred in exempting the defendant-tenant-Gandhi Aashram from the requirement of Section 13 (4) of the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950. The learned counsel Mr. N.L. Joshi also submitted that the defendant-tenant has not paid any rent to the appellant-plaintiff and by way of application dated 21.10.2003 before the learned Trial Court, it was brought to the notice that the defendant has not paying any rent under Section 19(A) of the Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001 but the learned Trial Court has not passed any order upon the application. The learned counsel also submitted that the defendant-tenant has failed to follow the procedure after he was declared first defaulter in the earlier suit filed for eviction, of course, appeal of which was pending when the second suit for eviction was filed, in view of the 'remark of caution' made by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Shiv Dutt Jadia v. Ganga Devi reported in (2002) 3 SCC 189 . In the last, it is prayed that in view of the aforesaid submissions, substantial questions of law framed in the present second appeal filed by the appellant-plaintiff deserves to be answered in favour of the plaintiff and a decree of eviction deserves to be granted against the defendant-tenant. 7. Per contra, the learned counsel Mr. V.K. Bhadu appearing for the defendant-tenant supported the impugned judgments and decree passed by the two Courts below. The learned counsel also submitted that the defendant-tenant has regularly paid or deposited the rent of the suit shop in question and has not committed any default in payment of rent. The learned counsel submitted that no substantial question of law arises for consideration and this appeal of the appellant-appellant deserves to be dismissed. However, he failed to satisfy this Court about any payment of rent paid by the defendant after the year 2003. 8. Having heard the learned counsels for the parties and upon perusal of the impugned judgments and decrees of the both Courts below, this Court is satisfied that the substantial question of law as framed on 01.04.2015 deserves to be answered in favour of the appellant-plaintiff and this appeal deserves acceptance. In view of Hon'ble Supreme Court decision in the case of Shiv Dutt Jadiya (supra), this Court asked the learned counsel Mr. V.K. Bhadu appearing for the defendant to show any proof that the defendant has tendered the rent or sent the notice asking the bank account number of the plaintiff after he was declared first defaulter in the earlier suit or having deposited the same in the Court during this appeal, as the defendant was required to deposit the rent under Section 19A of the Act, the learned counsel was not in a position to produce any proof to satisfy the Court about such payment of rent. 9. 9. In the case of Bulaki Dass S/o Asha Ram Purohit (supra), this Court granted eviction decree upon the second default committed by the tenant in payment of monthly rent during the pendency of the appeal. This Court in the aforesaid case of Bulaki Dass Purohit has held as under:- "18. Having heard the learned counsel at length and having gone through the record of the case and the judgments of two Courts below and the judgments cited at Bar, this Court is of the opinion that the Courts below cannot be said to have erred in any manner in passing the eviction decree against the appellant-tenant on the ground of second default. The deposit in the Court of learned Munsif Magistrate without any procedure known to law at all under Section 19A of the Act or otherwise is of no consequence and cannot enure to the benefit of the defendant-tenant. The said deposit, if any, is no deposit and has been rightly treated as not a valid tender of rent by the defendant-tenant by the Courts below. Admittedly, the first deposit itself for the month of June, 1980 was made by the tenant on 17.7.1980 after the suit proceedings terminated on 11.7.1980 with dismissal of the appeal by the first appellate court. Therefore, on 14.7.1980, no proceedings were pending in the Court and, therefore, deposit of rent for the month of June, 1980 in the learned trial Court was not at all a valid tender. Similarly deposits for the month of July, 1980 and August, 1980 were also without any consequence. The present and second suit came to be filed by the plaintiff on 4.2.1981. Though it was required of the learned trial Court to determine the arrears of rent under Section 13(3) of the Act, since it was a suit on the ground of second default, merely because that is not done, the defendant-tenant cannot take any advantage of that situation. After institution of the suit on 4.2.1981, any deposit under Section 19A of the Act was also not permissible as held by this Court in Swaran Devi v. Kailash Chandra (supra). After institution of the suit on 4.2.1981, any deposit under Section 19A of the Act was also not permissible as held by this Court in Swaran Devi v. Kailash Chandra (supra). The provisions of Section 19A of the Act are meant to be resorted to if the landlord illegally refused to accept the rent from the tenant after following the procedure under Clause (a) and (b) both, as has been laid in the case of Bajrang Lal v. Ramdeo (supra). Nothing of this sort under Clause (b) was followed by the appellant for any of the default months upto January, 1981. The tenant in order to maintain his tenancy right is allowed to deposit the rent in the Court instead of payment of the same to the landlord only after following the mandatory procedure under Clause (a) and (b) both. In the present case, there is nothing on record to show that the rent at least for the month of June, 1980 to August, 1980 was tendered to the landlord at any point of time, therefore, deposit for these three months cannot be said to be a valid deposit as per provisions of Section 19A of the Act. Similarly, for the month of September, 1980 to November, 1980, the money orders sent by the defendant which were of course refused by the plaintiff landlord for these three months also, there was no deposit of the same by the tenant in the Court under Section 19A of the Act. Thus, for six months from June, 1980 to November, 1980, the second default stood committed by the tenant. The deposit under Section 19A of the Act which came to be made by the defendant -tenant on 10.2.181 for 5 months (September, 1980 to January, 198) was not in accordance with law, after institution of present suit on 4.2.1981 and as procedure both under Clause (a) and (b) was not followed by the tenant and, therefore, the said deposit also does not wash away the second default which already stood committed by the defendant - tenant. Admittedly, the law does not permit any leniency and waiver in the case of second default and eviction decree under Section 13(1)(a) of the Act is bound to be passed on commitment of second default in payment of rent. Admittedly, the law does not permit any leniency and waiver in the case of second default and eviction decree under Section 13(1)(a) of the Act is bound to be passed on commitment of second default in payment of rent. As already discussed above, the second default for the period of six months from June, 1980 to November, 1980 stood committed by the defendant-tenant on 15th December, 1980 and the eviction decree was bound to be passed and was, therefore, rightly passed by the Courts below. 19. The judgments cited by the learned counsel for the appellant-defendant do not help the case of the appellant in any manner, and they are distinguishable from the facts of the present case, whereas the judgments relied upon by the learned counsel for the plaintiff-respondent fully support the case of the plaintiff-respondent, particularly decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Kuldeep Singh (supra), decision of this Court in the case of Bajrang Lal (supra) and the decision of this Court in the case of Swaran Devi (supra) also support the case of the plaintiff-respondent. 20. Consequently, this Court is of the opinion that there is no force in the present second appeal filed by the appellant-defendant and the same deserves to be dismissed and the substantial question of law quoted above deserves to be answered against the defendant-tenant and the decree of eviction deserves to be upheld by this Court. Accordingly, this second appeal is dismissed with costs throughout." 10. Accordingly, the present second appeal filed by the appellant-plaintiff- Mool Chand now represented by his Legal Representatives is allowed, while giving answers of the aforesaid substantial questions of law in favour of the plaintiff-appellant. The costs of Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand only) is imposed on the defendant-tenant to be paid to the appellant-landlord. A copy of this order be sent to both the Courts below and the parties concerned forthwith. 11. The respondent-defendant-tenant shall hand over the peaceful and vacant possession of the suit premises to the appellant-plaintiff (landlord) within a period of six months from today, i.e., on or before 31.10.2015 and shall pay mesne profit @ Rs. A copy of this order be sent to both the Courts below and the parties concerned forthwith. 11. The respondent-defendant-tenant shall hand over the peaceful and vacant possession of the suit premises to the appellant-plaintiff (landlord) within a period of six months from today, i.e., on or before 31.10.2015 and shall pay mesne profit @ Rs. 3,000/- per month commencing from the month of May, 2015 and will further continue to pay the mesne profits each month by 15th day of the next succeeding month or in advance to the respondents-plaintiffs till the vacant possession is handed over to the plaintiff-appellant and in case there is any default in payment of mesne profit, the period of six months for eviction shall stand reduced and the decree of eviction would become executable forthwith. The respondent-tenant shall also clear all the arrears of the rent or mesne profit within three months from today, otherwise the amount shall bear interest @ 9% per annum. The defendant-tenant shall also not sub-let, assign or part with the possession of the suit premises or any part thereof in favour of any one else and would not create any third party interest in the same during the aforesaid period and the same would be treated as void and such third party will also bound by this decree. The respondent-defendant shall furnish a written undertaking incorporating the aforesaid conditions in the trial court within one month and one copy thereof along with affidavit, in this Court. It is made clear that if the peaceful and vacant possession of the suit shop is not handed over or rent or mesne profits are not paid to the appellant-plaintiff-landlord within a period of six months from today, besides execution of the decree in normal course, the appellant-plaintiff shall also be entitled to invoke the contempt jurisdiction of this Court.Appeal allowed. *******