JUDGMENT Vishnu Chandra Gupta, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. By means of this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the petitioners, namely, Baij Nath, Smt. Anju, Pinki, Brijendra and Dhirendra have prayed for quashing the order dated 02.02.2015 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, Kunda Pratapgarh in Complaint Case No. 63 of 2014 (Vijay Kumar Vs. Baij Nath and others), under Sections 323, 452, 427, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station Baghrai, District- Pratapgarh. 3. It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have not been arrested. Neither they have surrendered before the Court below nor got them bailed out. 4. From the perusal of material on record, it could not be said that no case is made out against the petitioners. Therefore, at this stage no interference is called for by this Court. The petition lacks merit. 5. However, if the petitioners surrender before the court below within three weeks from today and move bail application, the same shall be considered and disposed of expeditiously in accordance with law and also keeping in view the directions contained in the judgment delivered by the Apex Court reported in 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC) (Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P.), in case the accused petitioners have not yet surrendered and applied for bail. 6. For three weeks or till the date of surrender, whichever is earlier, no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioners. With this observation, the petition is finally disposed of.