JUDGMENT Vipin Sinha, J. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The present revision has been filed being aggrieved against the order dated 17.03.2015 by means of which an interim maintenance of Rs. 2000/- for the wife and Rs. 1000/- for the child has been awarded, meaning thereby a total sum of Rs. 3000/- has been awarded towards the interim maintenance. 3. Learned counsel for the revisionist submits that he is a daily wage laborer and his total earning is about Rs. 3000/- per month and as such he is not in a position to pay the interim maintenance as awarded by the court below from the date of application. 4. In view of facts and circumstances of the case, the present revision is being disposed off finally without issuing any notice to the opposite party with the following directions: a) that the applicant shall deposit the amount of interim maintenance as fixed by the court below vide order dated 17.03.2015 from the date of order and not from the date of application; b) that the arrears of maintenance of one month shall be deposited by the revisionist within 15 days from today and shall continue to deposit thereafter the maintenance by 10th of each calender month; c) that thereafter the proceedings U/s 125 Cr.P.C. shall itself be heard and disposed off finally by means of a reasoned and speaking order expeditiously preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order in accordance with Section 309 Cr.P.C. and in view of principle as has been laid down in the recent judgement of Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Shamima Farooqui Vs. Shahid Khan in Criminal Appeal Nos. 564-565 of 2015 decided on 06.04.2015. With the above direction, the present revision is disposed off finally.