JUDGMENT 1. - None appears on behalf of the complainant even the case was called in second round, as none appeared for the complainant in first round. 2. By this criminal misc. petition, challenge to the order dated 03rd September, 2012 passed by the Revisional Court has been made on the ground that the accused was not heard, though the order is substantially against him. A reference of Section 397 to 401 of Cr.P.C. has been given, which provides opportunity of hearing to the accused. A prayer is accordingly made for quashing of the order dated 03rd September, 2012 so as the subsequent order. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed this petition, however, none appears for the complainant. 4. I have considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner and find that order by the Revisional Court is without hearing the accused. The reference of Section 397 to 401 Cr.P.C. is relevant. 5. The perusal of the impugned order dated 03rd September, 2012 shows notice only to the Public Prosecutor and not to the accused, though the revision petition was filed against the order dated 26th June, 2012 whereby Final Report in favour of the accused was accepted. 6. In view of the above, the impugned order dated 03rd September, 2012 is quashed having been passed without hearing the accused. It is obviously with remand of the case to the Revisional Court to hear all the parties. As the order dated 03rd September, 2012 has been quashed, consequential order passed by the trial Court for taking cognisance of offence would also go because it is in reference to the order of Revisional Court dated 03rd September, 2012.The parties are directed to appear before the Revisional Court on 30th April, 2015 and as the non-petitioner - complainant is not present in the Court, the Revisional Court would issue notice for his appearance.With the aforesaid, this criminal misc. petition stands allowed. This disposes of the stay application as well.Petition allowed. *******