JUDGMENT 1. - The instant appeal has been filed against the impugned judgment and award dated 24th May, 2007 passed by the Judge, MACT, Aklera, Distt. Jhalawar. 2. Brief facts of the case are that on 8th May, 2006 at about 1.00 a.m. the deceased Onkar Singh was driving the motor cycle No. RJ-17SA-4807 and one Rodu Lai was sitting behind him and they were going from Manoharthana to Todra Sammelan. As and when they reached near Jalampura village suddenly a jeep Bajaj Tempo Trax bearing No. RJ-17PA-0049 which was being driven rashly and negligently by its driver i.e. appellant No. 2, came and dashed the motor cycle. As a result thereof, both the occupants of the motor cycle sustained injuries and ultimately Onkar Singh died. With regard to the aforesaid accident, a claim petition was filed on behalf of the claimant/s claiming compensation as mentioned therein. 3. Notices were issued to the opposite parties. Reply to the claim petition was filed and the learned Tribunal framed the issues. After hearing all the parties, the learned Tribunal passed the aforesaid impugned judgment and award dated 24th May, 2007. 4. Against the impugned judgment and award dated 24th May, 2007, the appellant preferred the instant appeal for the relief as prayed for in it. 5. Learned Counsel for the appellant has contended that the learned Tribunal has failed to appreciate each and every aspect of the matter as also the evidence available on record. The award passed by the learned Tribunal is illegal, without jurisdiction and contrary to the facts of the case. It has been contended that learned Tribunal while deciding the issue No. 4 has committed gross illegality by exonerating the Insurance Company from its liability and giving recovery rights against the appellant. Hence, impugned award deserves to be set aside. 6. On the other hand, learned Counsel for the respondents has opposed the submissions advanced on behalf of appellant and requested for maintaining the award. 7. Hence, impugned award deserves to be set aside. 6. On the other hand, learned Counsel for the respondents has opposed the submissions advanced on behalf of appellant and requested for maintaining the award. 7. I have heard learned Counsel for the parties and perused the impugned judgment and award dated 24th May, 2007.1 am in agreement with the findings arrived at by the learned Tribunal, which are reproduced as under : fcUnq la[;k 2 bl laca/k esa i=koyh ij vkbZ lk{; ls ;g vkd'"V gqvk gS fd nq?kZVuk ds le; vizkFkhZ la[;k 1 yfyr dqekj thi pyk jgk Fkk vkSj nq?kZVuk esa fyIr thi vkj0ts0 17@ih,&0049 vizkFkhZ la[;k 3 jktsUnz dqekj ds LokfeRo o dCts dh FkhA izn'kZ 16 uksfVl/kkjk 133 ,e0oh0 ,DV ds vuqlkj Hkh ;g Li"V gS fd vizkFkhZ la[;k 1 yfyr dqekj vizkFkhZ la[;k 2 jktsUnz dqekj ds fu;kstu esa FkkA bl izdkj ;g Li"V gS fd vizkFkhZ la0&1 yfyr dqekj] vizkFkhZ la0&1 jktsUnz dqekj ds fu;kstu esa gksdj mlh ds fgrkFkZ ;k mldh lgefr@tkudkjh ls okgu pyk jgk FkkA ;g fcUnq blh izdkj fofuf'pr fd;k tkrk gSA fcUnq la[;k 4 bl laca/k esa vizkFkhZ chek daiuh dh vksj ls eq[; rdZ ;g jgk gS fd oDr nq?kZVuk okgu pkyd ds ikl oS/k ,oa izHkkoh pkyd ykbZlsal ugha FkkA okgu pkyd yfyr dqekj oDr nq?kZVuk VSDlh ijfeV ij O;kolkf;d okgu pyk jgk Fkk tcfd mlds ikl gYdk izkbZosV eksVj;ku pykus dk ykbZlsal FkkA okgu pkyd ds ikl O;kolkf;d ykbZlsal u gksus ds dkj.k okgu ekfyd }kjk ikWfylh 'krksZa dk mYya?ku fd;k gS blfy, chek daiuh izfrdj vnk;xh gsrq mRrjnk;h ugha gSA bl laca/k esa mUgksaus 2006 ,0th0ts0 ist 1336] us'kuy ba';ksjsal daiuh fyfeVsM cuke dqlqe jk; o vU; dk U;k; n'"Vkar izLrqr fd;k gSA blesa ;g fl}kUr izfrikfnr fd;k gS fd okgu Lokeh }kjk ikWfylh 'krksZa ds foijhr vkpj.k fd;k x;k vkSj ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk mPp U;k;ky; }kjk fn;s x;s fu"d"kZ dks mfpr ugha ekuk FkkA ,slh fLFkfr esa orZeku Dyse esa Hkh bU';ksjsal daiuh mRrjnk;h ugha gSA fdUrq bl U;k; n'"VkUr esa ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk ;g fl)kUr izfrikfnr fd;k x;k gS fd bU';ksjsal vf/kfu;e ,d ykHknk;h mn~ns';ksa ds fopkjxr fd;s tkus ;ksX; gS vkSj ,slh fLFkfr esa bU';ksjsal daiuh dks vokMZ dh jkf'k dks vnk djus dk funsZ'k fn;k fd Hkqxrku Dyses.V dks fd;s tkus ds iwoZ okgu Lokeh dks uksfVl fn;k tkosxk vkSj mlls ml jkf'k dh flD;wfjVh izLrqr djkbZ tk,xh tks chek daiuh }kjk vnk dh tk jgh gSA fookfnr okgu Hkh flD;wfjVh ds :i esa vVSp fd;k tk ldrk gS vkSj ;fn vko';d gqvk rks btjk; U;k;ky; }kjk vkj0Vh0vks0 ls bl laca/k esa lgk;rk ys ldrk gS rkfd bU';ksjsal daiuh dk Hkqxrku okgu Lokeh }kjk fd;k tk lds tk lds vkSj ml laca/k esa fdlh Hkh izdkj dh deh ik;h tkrh gS rks btjk; U;k;ky; flD;wfjVh ls fuLrkfjr djs ;k vU; lEifRr ls olwy dj ldsxhA bl laca/k esa mHk;i{k ds rdksZa ds foospu ls o izLrqr U;k; n'"Vkar ds laca/k esa ;g fu"d"kZ fy;s tkus ;ksX; gS fd ;|fi bU';ksjsal daiuh }kjk mBkbZ xbZ vkifRr ljoku gS vkSj mldh vnk;xh gsrq dksbZ mRrjnkf;Rork ugha curh gS fdUrq ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk ftl izdkj ls Hkqxrku dh dk;Zokgh dk funsZ'k fn;k gS mlh ds vuq:i bl laca/k esa fu"d"kZ fy;s tkus ;ksX; gS vkSj ;g fcUnq blh izdkj fofuf'pr fd;k tkrk gSA Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and the findings arrived at by learned Tribunal as quoted herein above, the learned Tribunal is found to have dealt with each and every aspect of the matter, and has rightly passed the impugned judgment and award. I am in unison with the findings arrived at by the learned Tribunal. Hence, I do not think it just and proper to interfere with the impugned award dated 24th May, 2007 passed by the Tribunal, and thus the appeal having no force, is hereby dismissed after confirming the judgment and award dated 24th May, 2007 passed by the learned Tribunal.Appeal dismissed. *******