Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2015 DIGILAW 899 (MAD)

S. Sankarkumar v. State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary to the Government, School Education Department, Chennai

2015-02-13

K.RAVICHANDRA BAABU

body2015
Judgment 1. The petitioner is seeking for a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents herein to admit the petitioner's daughter, Pon Sneha, in Commerce with Computer Science Group at the seventh respondent School and consequentially permit her to attend the +2 Public examinations in 'Commerce with Computer Science', considering the petitioner's representation dated 08.01.2015. 2. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 6 and the learned Counsel appearing for the seventh respondent. 3. On 29.01.2015 this Court has passed the following order: "The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner will give a letter to the seventh respondent Institution tendering apology and also an undertaking as required by the Institution so as to enable to purse her studies of +2 Examination in Commerce with Computer Science. Such letter and undertaking shall be given by the petitioner to the seventh respondent School within a period of one week from today. In the meantime the petitioner is permitted to file an application to the third respondent through the seventh respondent seeking for issuance of Hall-ticket for Commerce with Computer Science (+Examination). On receipt of such application the third respondent shall issue hall ticket to the petitioner to the said examination. Such exercise shall be done by the third respondent on or before 04.02.2015. Post on 04.02.2015." 4. Thereafter, the matter was adjourned on three occasions and finally today the matter is posted for reporting compliance. Today, the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 6 submitted that the petitioner's daughter's name is included in the nominal role and she was permitted to attend the +2 examination in Commerce with Computer Science Group. 5. Recording the submissions made by the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 6, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. The learned Counsel appearing for the seventh respondent also submitted that the petitioner's daughter is permitted to attend the class. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous petition is closed.