JUDGMENT Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned AGA. 2. We do not find any merit in this petition warranting interference in writ jurisdiction. 3. At this stage the learned counsel for the petitioner made a prayer that her bail application in Case Crime No.321 of 2014 under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120 B IPC, P.S. Kydganj, District-Allahabad be ordered to be considered expeditiously, if possible, on the same day by the Court below. 4. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA, this petition is finally disposed of with a direction that if the petitioner appears and surrenders before the Court below within two weeks from today and applies for bail, then her bail application shall be considered and decided in view of the settled law laid down by the Seven Judges decision of this Court in the case of Amrawati and Another v. State of U. P. reported in 2004 (57) ALR 290 as well as judgment passed by Hon'ble Apex Court reported in Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh v. State of U. P., reported in 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (S.C.) after hearing the Public Prosecutor in the aforesaid crime number of the aforesaid offences.