JUDGMENT : 1. We have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. These Special Appeals arise out of the interim orders, dated 26.03.2015 and 30.03.2015, passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3711/2015, in which the judgment was reserved by learned Single Judge on 31.03.2015. 3. On 03.04.2015, an interim order was passed by a Division Bench, by which, after staying the interim orders, dated 26.03.2015 and 30.03.2015, passed by learned Single Judge in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3711/2015, the State was given liberty for publishing the list of candidates for admission to PG Course for counselling and for admission existing prior to the passing of the orders of learned Single Judge. 4. The judgment in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3711/2015, was delivered on 07.04.2015, by which the writ petition was allowed, with directions to the respondents to consider those candidates in in-service category, who are in possession of qualification as given in the Ordinance 279-E-IV, and for it, a candidate must have actually worked in the rural area with required length where rural allowance is admissible as per the Notification dated 26.12.2011. 5. With the final judgment, delivered in the writ petition, these Special Appeals, filed against the interim orders, which do not survive, are rendered infructuous. The interim order passed in the Special Appeals, will also have to give way to the final judgment of learned Single Judge. 6. A request has been made on behalf of both the parties, to issue clarification, as to how the list for admissions for in-service candidates is to be revised. 7. We are afraid that in these Special Appeals, which arose out of interim orders, after the final judgment has been passed in the writ petition, no such direction can be given. It is for the parties to protect their interests by filing appropriate Special Appeals against the final judgment, if they are so advised. 8. The Special Appeals are, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous. 9. A copy of the judgment be placed in the connected file.