Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2016 DIGILAW 10 (RAJ)

Basaye Khan v. State of Rajasthan

2016-01-04

VIJAY BISHNOI

body2016
JUDGMENT : Vijay Bishnoi, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material on record. 2. The petitioner has been arrested in FIR No.39/2014 of Police Station, Sankda, District Jaisalmer for the offence punishable under Section 136 Electricity Act, 2003. He has preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in this case on the basis of the statement of co-accused, however, no recovery has been effected at the instance of the petitioner. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. 6. Accordingly, this bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner - Basaye Khan S/o Nihal Khan shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.39/2014 of Police Station, Sankda, District Jaisalmer provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.