ORDER : I. A. No. 2588 of 2016 This interlocutory application has been preferred by the petitioner for disposing of Criminal Revision No. 697 of 2007 in view of the subsequent event which had taken place between the petitioner and the opposite party nos. 2 & 3. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that a compromise was effected between the petitioner and the opposite party no. 2 before the Principal Judge, Family Court, Bilaspur, Chattisgarh wherein on the basis of such compromise, a decree was prepared. It has been submitted that both the parties have agreed to settle all the matters which have been instituted for and against them and in fact pursuant to the divorce obtained by mutual consent, an amount of Rs. 5,70,000/- as agreed upon as already been paid to the opposite party no. 2. It has therefore been submitted that in view of the compromise, the maintenance case should be dropped. 3. Mr. Navneet Sahay, learned counsel for the opposite party nos. 2 & 3 has accepted the factum of compromise and stated that he does not have any objection, if the impugned order dated 10.07.2007 passed by Sri Pradeep Kumar Singh, Principal Judge, Family Court, Dumka in Cr. Misc. Case No. 67 of 2005 be set aside. 4. It appears that before the Principal Judge, Family Court, Bilaspur, Chattisgarh, a compromise was effected between both the sides which also included the pending cases which are existing against each other. Based on the compromise so effected, a decree for mutual divorce has already been passed. As has been stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner and agreed by the learned counsel for the opposite party nos. 2 and 3, the order passed in maintenance case which is under challenge in the present application which also forms the subject matter of the challenge in the instant interlocutory application be set aside. 5. It further appears that an amount of Rs. 5,70,000/- as has been agreed upon at the time of the compromise has been paid by the petitioner to the opposite party no. 2. 6. In view of the circumstances enumerated above pursuant to the compromise arrived at between the petitioner and the opposite party no. 2 and which includes within its periphery criminal miscellaneous case no. 5,70,000/- as has been agreed upon at the time of the compromise has been paid by the petitioner to the opposite party no. 2. 6. In view of the circumstances enumerated above pursuant to the compromise arrived at between the petitioner and the opposite party no. 2 and which includes within its periphery criminal miscellaneous case no. 67 of 2005, the impugned order dated 10.07.2007 passed by Sri Pradeep Kumar Singh, Principal Judge, Family Court, Dumka in Cr. Misc. Case No. 67 of 2005 by which a monthly maintenance of Rs. 2,500/- per month along with Rs. 15,000/- as litigation cost awarded to the opposite parties is set aside. 7. This interlocutory application stands allowed. Cr. Revision No. 697 of 2007: 8. In view of the order passed in the I. A. No. 2588 of 2016, Criminal Revision No. 697 of 2007 also stands allowed.