JUDGMENT : Mansoor Ahmad Mir, J. 1. It is contended that the respondents have committed the breach as they have not complied with the directions, dated 23rd August, 2013, made by this Court in CWP No. 4846 of 2013. 2. It would be profitable to reproduce para 3 of the judgment made by this Court in CWP No. 4846 of 2013 herein: “3. It is undisputed before us that the father of the petitioner late Jagat Ram was working as Forest Worker with the respondents and died on 14.3.2003. In these circumstances, it is but obvious that the Rules prevalent in the year 2003 would be applicable to the case of the petitioner not subsequent Rules. We find that the order, Annexure P2, is a non-speaking order, as it does not disclose any specific rules. We also note that the reply filed by the Conservator of Forests is equally vague. In these circumstances, we quash and set aside Annexure P2. Writ petition is allowed. The respondents are directed to appoint the petitioner to the post of Chowkidar in accordance with the Rules applicable on 11.4.2003, when the father of the petitioner died, when the cause of action accrued to the petitioner. The action be taken within next eight weeks positively. Writ petition stands disposed of.” 3. The petitioner had prayed for compassionate appointment in lieu of the death of his father and in terms of the judgment (supra), the respondents were directed to appoint the petitioner to the post of Chowkidar. 4. The respondents have filed detailed compliance report, the perusal of which does disclose that the respondents have appointed the petitioner on compassionate grounds against the post of Chowkidar, thus, have complied with the Court directions. It is for the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy, if he is still aggrieved. 5. The contempt petition is disposed of accordingly.