Research › Search › Judgment

Uttarakhand High Court · body

2016 DIGILAW 111 (UTT)

Purna Devi v. State of Uttarakhand

2016-03-05

SUDHANSHU DHULIA

body2016
JUDGMENT : 1. Mr. Siddhartha Sah, Advocate present for the applicants. 2. Mr. B.M.Pingal, Brief Holder, present for the State/respondent no.1. 3. The First Information Report has been lodged by respondent no.2, which has been registered as case crime no.07 of 2014 under Sections 498A/323 of IPC and 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, at Police Station Chowki Jolly Grant, Doiwala, Dehradun against the applicants. After investigating the police submitted the charge sheet against the applicants. Consequently, the learned Magistrate took cognizance against the present applicants. Without appearing before the court below, inasmuch as, summons have been issued to the applicants, they have filed the present application under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., invoking inherent jurisdiction of this Court. 4. At this stage no interference is being called for in the matter. 5. Let the applicants move an appropriate application, in accordance with law, for discharge or any other relief. In case, applicants appear before the court concerned and move bail application, the same shall be considered, as far as possible on the same day itself on its merit. It is further made clear that the court shall keep in mind that applicant no.1 is a woman and 70 years of age, while considering the bail application of the applicants. In case, it is deferred for any reason (including its rejection), the court concerned may consider granting interim bail to the applicants. 6. The application filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., stands disposed.