JUDGMENT Pankaj Naqvi,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing the charge sheet No.123 of 2015 dated 29.12.2015 in Case No.112 of 2015 (Case Crime No.174 of 2015, under Sections 420, 468, 471 and 506 IPC, and Charge Sheet No.124 of 2015 dated 29.12.2015 in Case No.113 of 2016 (Case Crime No.174A of 2015) under Sections 420, 468, 471 and 506 IPC, both at P.S.Faizganj Behta, District Badaun, pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate, Bisauli, Badaun. 3. The contention of the counsel for the applicants is that no offence against the applicants are disclosed and the present prosecution has been instituted with a malafide intention for the purposes of harassment. He pointed out certain documents and statements in support of his contention. 4. From the perusal of the materials on record and looking into the facts of the case at this stage it cannot be said that no offence is made out against the applicants. All the submissions made at the bar relate to the disputed questions of fact, which cannot be adjudicated upon by this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. At this stage only prima facie case is to be seen in the light of the law laid down by Supreme Court in cases of R.P. Kapur Vs. State of Punjab, A.I.R. 1960 S.C. 866, State of Haryana Vs. Bhajan Lal, 1992 SCC (Cr.) 426, State of Bihar Vs. P.P.Sharma, 1992 SCC (Cr.) 192 and lastly Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. Vs. Mohd. Saraful Haq and another (Para-10) 2005 SCC (Cr.) 283. The prayer claimed is refused. The application is dismissed.