JUDGMENT Suneet Kumar,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.G.A for the State. 2. This application has been filed for quashing the orders dated 10 October 2013 and 11 March 2016 as well as entire proceedings of case No. 654 of 2009 ( Heera Lal Vs. Bijendra Singh and others) . 3. From perusal of the material on record and looking into the facts of the case at this stage, it cannot be said that prima facie no offence is made out against the applicant. All the submissions made at the bar relate to the disputed questions of fact, which cannot be adjudicated upon by this court, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. At this stage, only prima facie case is to be seen in the light of law laid down by Supreme court in cases of R.P. Kapur Vs. State of Punjab, AIR 1960 SC 866 , State of Haryana Vs. Bhajan Lal, 1992, SCC(Cr) 426, State of Bihar Vs. P.P. Sharma, 1992 SCC(Cr) 192 and lastly Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. Vs. Mohd. Saraful Haq and another, 2005 SCC(Cr) 283. 4. In this view of the matter, the prayer for quashing the orders as well as proceedings of the aforesaid case is refused. 5. However, it is provided that in case the applicants appear and surrender before the court below within 30 days from today and apply for bail, their prayer for bail shall be considered and decided in view of the settled law laid by this court in the case of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P reported in 2004(57) ALR 290 as well as judgement passed by Hon'ble Apex Court reported in 2009 (3) ADJ 322(SC) Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P. For a period of 30 days from today or till the disposal of the application for bail whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants. 6. It is made clear that in case the applicants do not appear before the Court below within the aforesaid period, coercive action shall be taken against them. With the aforesaid directions, this petition is disposed of.