JUDGMENT Mahendra Dayal, J. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned AGA for the State and also perused the record. 2. This application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed to quash the order dated 08.07.2014 passed by Additional Session Judge/Special Judge (E.C.Act), Hardoi in Criminal Revision No.112/2013 and the order dated 19/20.04.2013 passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.5, Hardoi in complaint Case No.522/2012, under Sections 323, 504, 395 IPC relating to Police Station Lonar, District Hardoi. 3. It has been contended on behalf of the applicant that the applicant is ready to surrender before the Court below and seek bail and the lower court be directed to consider the bail application of the applicant expeditiously. 4. The learned AGA has opposed the prayer but has no objection for issuance of such directions. 5. The power under Section 482 CrPC is invoked to give effect to any order under the Code, or to prevent abuse of process of any court or otherwise to secure the ends of justice. It is a settled law that such power is not to be exercised in a routine manner so as to cut short the process of law. If from bare perusal of the FIR or complaint, it is evident that it does not disclose any offence at all or is frivolous on the face of it, the court may exercise its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC. This will not include appreciation of evidence so as to conclude that the prosecution evidence is reliable or not. The Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC cannot go into the truth or otherwise of the allegations and appreciate evidence, else it may result in causing obstruction in the progress of inquiry or trial which may not be in public interest. If the allegations in the FIR or the complaint are so absurd and improbable on the basis of which it can be safely concluded that there is no sufficient ground for proceeding, the Court may interfere to prevent abuse of the process of law. 6. From the perusal of the record, it cannot be said that the cognizable offence is not made out against the applicant, I do not find any sufficient ground to quash the summoning order. 7. 6. From the perusal of the record, it cannot be said that the cognizable offence is not made out against the applicant, I do not find any sufficient ground to quash the summoning order. 7. However, keeping in view the fact that the applicant is ready to surrender and seek bail, the present application under Section 482 CrPC is disposed of with liberty to the applicant to surrenders before the Court below and seek bail within three weeks from the date of this order with the direction that the bail application of the applicant, if filed within the period allowed by this Court, shall be considered and decided expeditiously in terms of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India. For a period of three weeks from today, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant.