JUDGMENT Om Prakash-VII,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record. 2. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing the charge-sheet in case no. 828 of 2012, arising out of case crime no. 11 of 2012, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 471 IPC, P.S. Kerakat, District Jaunpur pending before Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-II, Jaunpur. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that non-bailable warrant has been issued in the matter against the applicant. Learned counsel for the applicant further contended that the reasons on account of which the applicant failed to appear before the trial court were beyond his control and the applicant has every intention to appear before the court concerned and participate in the proceedings of the trial. 4. Learned AGA appearing for the State opposed the prayer. 5. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, after perusing the impugned order as well as the materials brought on record and having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, I do not find any good ground to quash the charge-sheet or the order issuing non-bailable warrrant. The prayer made in the application is refused. 6. However, the application is disposed of with a direction to the applicant to surrender before the court below and apply for bail within fifteen days from today, which shall be considered and decided by the court below in accordance with settled principles of law. For a period of fifteen days from today, no coercive action shall be taken/given effect to against the applicant. 7. In case of default, the Court below will be at liberty to take all coercive steps against the applicant for ensuring his appearance. 8. With the aforesaid observations, the application is disposed of.