Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2016 DIGILAW 1382 (MAD)

S. Balamurugan v. Commissioner, Madurai City Municipal Corporation, Aringar Anna Maligai, Madurai

2016-03-31

B.RAJENDRAN

body2016
ORDER : The prayer in the Writ Petition is for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the impugned demand notice issued by the respondent dated 05.01.2016 in assessment No.44966 and quash the same and further direct the respondent to provide appropriate calculation with applying uniform method of assessment. 2. Mr. R.Murali learned Standing Counsel takes notice for the respondent. By consent of both sides, this writ petition itself is taken up for hearing. 3. The order impugned in this writ petition is issued pursuant to the direction of this Court in the earlier writ petition. If the petitioner is aggrieved against the said order, he has got a right of appeal before the Tax Appellate Tribunal, and even the alleged payment of Rs.50,000/-by the petitioner can be adjusted to. 4. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal before the appellate authority. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous petitions are also dismissed.