Ratan Deo Bhagat v. State of Jharkhand through Chief Secretary, Ranchi
2016-09-20
H.C.MISHRA
body2016
DigiLaw.ai
ORDER : Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the respondent/State. 2. Petitioners, who are working as Para Teachers in the subject of Urdu, have filed this writ application praying for the regularisation of their services as Assistant Teachers. The petitioners have also challenged the advertisement No.2/2015-16 issued by District Superintendent of Education, Lohardaga, whereby the posts have been advertised, in which 50% have been reserved for Para Teachers. Petitioners are aggrieved by the fact that certain number of posts have been reserved for the persons belonging to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes category also, which according to the learned counsel for the petitioners, should not be there, taking into consideration the language, for which the appointment is sought to be made. 3. I do not find any merit in the submission of learned counsel. The persons, belonging to Scheduled Casts and Scheduled Tribes, if they have the required qualification in Urdu Language, they may be considered for appointment as Assistant Teacher in Urdu and there cannot be any prohibition for the same. Since the posts have been advertised, in which 50% posts have been reserved for Para Teachers also, the petitioners may apply against these posts and take their chance for their selection in accordance with law. 4. There is no merit in this writ application and the same is accordingly, dismissed. Petition dismissed.