Research › Search › Judgment

Himachal Pradesh High Court · body

2016 DIGILAW 1447 (HP)

Himsun Power Pvt. Ltd. v. State of H. P.

2016-07-21

MANSOOR AHMAD MIR, SANDEEP SHARMA

body2016
JUDGMENT : Mansoor Ahmad Mir, J. After hearing for a while, learned counsel for the petitioner stated that he may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy and that the period spent in prosecuting the instant writ petition may be ordered to be excluded in terms of Section 14 of the Limitation Act. His statement is taken on record. Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection in case the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, but submitted that period spent in pursuing the instant proceedings may not be excluded. 2. We have examined the pleadings and have gone through the record and are of the considered view that it would be just to exclude the period spent by the petitioner in prosecuting the instant writ petition. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn, with liberty to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy, if any available, as per law applicable. It is made clear that in case the petitioner seeks appropriate remedy, if any available, the period spent from the date of filing of the writ petition till today shall be excluded while computing the period of limitation. Pending CMPs, if any, also stand disposed of.