JUDGMENT Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.G.A. 2. This petition has been filed by the petitioners with a prayer to quash the F.I.R. in case crime no. 287 of 2016, under sections 8 Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, P.S. Kerakat, district Jaunpur. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the marriage of petitioner no.1 is scheduled to be solemnized on 26.04.2016 and hence the interim protection may be granted to the petitioner for couple of weeks. 4. From the perusal of the impugned F.I.R. it appears that on the basis of the allegations made therein a prima facie cognizable offence is made out. There is no ground for interference in the F.I.R. Therefore, the prayer for quashing the impugned F.I.R. is refused. 5. However, it is directed that in case the petitioners appear before the court concerned within 30 days from today and apply for bail, the same shall be heard and disposed of by the courts below in view of the case of Smt. Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P. 2005 Cr.L.J. 755 which has been approved by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Versus State of U.P. reported in 2009(4) S.C.C. 437 . 6. It is further provided that if the investigation in this matter has been completed and police report under Section 173(2) Cr.P.C. has been filed, the petitioners shall not be entitled to any benefit of this order. 7. However considering the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners that the marriage of petitioner no.1 is scheduled to take place tomorrow, it is directed that for a period of ten days from today no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioners in the aforesaid case. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of.