JUDGMENT Heard learned counsel for petitioners, learned A.G.A. for the State and Sri Satyam Narayan, learned counsel for respondent no.4. 2. The relief sought in this petition is for quashing of the FIR registered at Case Crime No. 133 of 2016, under Sections 302, 504, 34 IPC, Police Station Inchauli, District Meerut. 3. The Full Bench of this Court in Ajit Singh @ Muraha v. State of U.P. (2006 (56) ACC 433) reiterated the view taken by the earlier Full Bench in Satya Pal v. State of U.P. (2000 Cr.L.J. 569) after considering the various decisions including State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal ( AIR 1992 SC 604 ) that there can be no interference with the investigation or order staying arrest unless cognizable offence is not ex-facie discernible from the allegations contained in the F.I.R. or there is any statutory restriction operating on the power of the Police to investigate a case. 4. From the perusal of the FIR, prima facie it cannot be said that no cognizable offence is made out. Hence no ground exists for quashing of the F.I.R. or staying the arrest of the petitioner. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed.