ORDER : Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have retired from the post of teaching and non-teaching of minority Aided High School, details of the individual are being shown in the chart given below: Sl No Name of the petitioner/Teacher Name of the School Date of appointment Date of Retirement 1. Minakshi Mallick Jadunath Girls High School, Hazaribag 06/04/1972 28.02.2006 2 Anima Kundu Jadunath Girls High School, Hazaribag 14.08.1981 30.11.2004 3 Salil Kumar Mallik Jadunath Girls High School, Hazaribag 05/08/1982 31.12.2012 4 Miss. Tapasi Roy Jadunath Girls High School, Hazaribag 14.08.1981 31.03.2015 5 Sikha Mukherjee Jadunath Girls High School, Hazaribag 21.01.1985 30.11.2015 3. It is the contention of the petitioners that the school in question is Government Aided Minority School and all expenses towards payment of salary and retirement benefits of the school employees is funded by the State Government from the public exchequer. The petitioners are also getting pension on the basis of the pension payment order issued by the office of the Accountant General. 4. In the present writ application, the grievance of the petitioners is in relation to non-payment of leave encashment amount on the earned leave outstanding against them. They have also stated that other post retiral dues have already been paid and that salary and post retirement benefit have been paid out of grant-in-aid provided by the State Government. 5. Mr. Madan Mohan Pan, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that though, the claim of the petitioners was resisted earlier by the respondent-State Government, but the issue has now been settled in view of the judgment rendered by the learned Division Bench of this Court in the case of Mariyam Tirkey Vrs. The State of Jharkhand & others in 2014 (2) JCR 1982 (Jhr.) : W.P.(S) No. 506 of 2013 and analogous cases dated 3rd January, 2014 which has also been reported in 2014 (1) JBCJ 465 and now upheld up to the Hon'ble Supreme Court vide judgment dated 15.12.2014 passed in Special Leave to Appeal (C) Nos. 20606-20607/2014. According to the petitioners, the writ petition may be disposed of in view of the judgment rendered as aforesaid by the learned Division Bench and affirmed up to the Hon'ble Supreme Court, by directing the respondents to pay the earned leave encashment amount to the petitioners. 6. 20606-20607/2014. According to the petitioners, the writ petition may be disposed of in view of the judgment rendered as aforesaid by the learned Division Bench and affirmed up to the Hon'ble Supreme Court, by directing the respondents to pay the earned leave encashment amount to the petitioners. 6. Learned counsel appearing for the Respondent-State does not dispute that the aforesaid issue relating to admissibility of the earned leave encashment amount to the teaching and non-teaching staff of Government/Aided Minority School has now been decided by the judgment rendered in the case of Mariyam Tirkey (Supra) and affirmed up to the Hon'ble Supreme Court. 7. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, in such circumstances, the writ petition is being disposed of by directing the respondent no. 3, to take a decision in the matter of grant of leave encashment amount to the petitioners after due scrutiny of their relevant service records and in view of the judgment rendered in the case of Mariyam Tirkey (Supra) within a period of ten weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order along with the representation on behalf of the petitioners. 8. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.