JUDGMENT Om Prakash-VII,J. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with the prayer to quash the impugned judgment and order dated 19.9.2015 passed by the A.C.J.M. IXth, Aligarh in case no. 1523 of 2014 (State Vs. Sabir and others), under Sections 452, 323, 504, 506 IPC, P.S. Delhi Gate, district Aligarh and also the order dated 2.11.2015 passed by the Sessions Judge, Aligarh in Criminal Revision No. 887 of 2015. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. 3. Submission of learned counsel for the applicants is that discharge application moved by the applicants was rejected on insufficient grounds. Revisional court also did not consider the pleas raised by the applicants in right perspective and illegally rejected the revision. It was further argued that on the date of incident said to have committed by the applicants. Opposite party no. 2 was in custody. Therefore, the story narrated in the F.I.R. becomes improbable. All these facts have not been considered by both the courts below. Prosecution against the applicants is abuse of process of law as the prosecution itself is not aware about the date of the incident. 4. Learned A.G.A. opposed the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicants. 5. I have considered the rival submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties. 6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and also going through the entire evidence and hearing the parties, keeping in view the observation recorded by the revisional court as well as the concerned Magistrate when wrong mentioning of the date of the offence as 16.6.2014 has been made clear during investigation as 13.6.2014, observation recorded by the revisional court cannot be said to be illegal or perverse. Prima facie case is made out. Cognizance taken in the matter is not illegal. 7. In view of the aforesaid, no interference under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is required by this Court. The application being devoid of merit is dismissed.