Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2016 DIGILAW 1626 (RAJ)

Bhupendra Singh @ Tammu S/o Mahendra Singh Bhati v. State of Rajasthan through P. P.

2016-11-16

VIJAY BISHNOI

body2016
ORDER : 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the complainant and also perused the material on record. 2. The petitioner has been arrested in FIR No.230/2016 of Police Station Sadar, Chittorgarh for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 341, 323/34 IPC. He has preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that though the allegation of firing gun shot injuries is against petitioner – Bhupendra Singh and as per the opinion of the medical jurist, the injuries of the fire arm are grievous in nature, but, it has not been mentioned that those injuries are dangerous to life. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel complainant have opposed the bail application. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. 6. Accordingly, this bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner – Bhupendra Singh @ Tammu son of Mahendra Singh Bhati shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No. 230/2016 of Police Station Sadar, Chittorgarh provided he executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.