Research › Search › Judgment

Punjab High Court · body

2016 DIGILAW 1780 (PNJ)

Rajbir v. State of Haryana

2016-07-26

A.B.CHAUDHARI

body2016
JUDGMENT : A.B. Chaudhari, J. This order shall dispose of both the captioned petitions. Heard learned counsel for the rival parties in FIR No.121 dated 19.08.2011 under Sections 148, 149, 323, 326 and 506 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 registered at Police Station Hassanpur District Palwal and cross case registered on the submissions of Chet Ram S/o Lal Chand-respondent No.2. The rival parties in these petitions are accused. Upon hearing the statements made by learned counsel for the parties and upon fact finding inquiry made by me it is no doubt true that offence under Section 307 was committed and same is serious looking to the weapons used by both the parties. However, the parties have now entered into compromise they being the neighbourers. Counsel for both the parties on instructions from them make a statement that hereinafter they would not indulged in such incident and take care to maintain their relation of neighbourers. The challan has been filed, as submitted by learned State counsel. In view of the fact that the parties have decided to buy peace, I think they should be allowed to compound/compromise in order to give one chance of reformation to both the parties. At the same time since the challan has been filed, it is deemed appropriate to pay compensation to the State since the entire police machinery was utilised in view of criminal law being set into motion by both the parties. Hence, the following order is made.:- ORDER 1. Both the petitions are allowed. 2. FIR is quashed and both the challans are also quashed. 3. Both the parties are directed to deposit an amount of Rs.20,000/- each with the office of Haryana Government Treasury, District-Palwal (Haryana).