Research › Search › Judgment

Punjab High Court · body

2016 DIGILAW 1851 (PNJ)

Reema Rani v. State of Punjab

2016-08-02

DAYA CHAUDHARY

body2016
JUDGMENT : Daya Chaudhary, J. This petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned show cause notice dated 05.04.2016 on the ground that the same is illegal, arbitrary and in violation of principles of natural justice and contrary to the ratio of judgment passed by Hon'ble Bombay High Court in PIL No.60 of 2012. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that show cause notice was issued to the petitioner and reply thereto has already been submitted but the petitioner is apprehending that an adverse order can be passed against her at any time. 3. Heard the arguments of learned counsel for the petitioner and have also perused the impugned order as well as other documents available on the file. 4. Admittedly, only a show cause notice has been issued to which the petitioner has submitted her reply but no decision has been taken thereupon so far. The petitioner is aggrieved that an adverse order can be passed against her. It cannot be presumed at this stage that an adverse order is going to be passed against the petitioner. 5. Hence, the present petition is dismissed as pre-mature.