JUDGMENT : Huluvadi G. Ramesh, J. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant-Commissioner, Pallavaram Municipality, learned counsel for the first respondent and the learned Special Government Pleader for the second respondent. By impugned order, the learned Single Judge allowed the writ petition and thereby the order passed by the appellant was quashed and the appellant was directed to issue Birth Certificate to the son of the first respondent herein, who was born on 1.11.2012 and correct the same as R. Amanullah as per the publication made in the Government Gazette dated 9.10.2013, within a period of three weeks. This order is under challenge on the ground that as per Section 15 of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, no such correction can be made, etc. 2. Under Section 15 of the abovesaid Act, what is contemplated is that if it is proved to the satisfaction of the Registrar that any entry of a birth or death in any register kept by him under the Act is erroneous in form or substance, or has been fraudulently or improperly made, he may, subject to such rules as may be made by the State Government with respect to the conditions on which and the circumstances in which such entries may be corrected or cancelled, correct the error or cancel the entry by suitable entry in the margin, without any alternation of the original entry, and shall sign the marginal entry and add thereto the date of the correction or cancellation. The above section provides the procedure to be followed by the Registrar on such application being made. He is vested with the power to correct the error or cancel the entry by suitable entry in the margin, without any alternation of the original entry, and shall sign the marginal entry and add thereto the date of the correction or cancellation. It does not necessarily mean that the entry cannot be made by way of alteration. What is contemplated is that in the place of entries being made, on satisfaction of the Registrar, he can only make a marginal entry and not alter the original entry. 3. Anyhow, it is not even a question of change or alteration of date of birth or death. It is only the change of name of the minor child based on a publication in the Government Gazette. 3. Anyhow, it is not even a question of change or alteration of date of birth or death. It is only the change of name of the minor child based on a publication in the Government Gazette. Therefore, the Officer concerned is duty bound to change the name and issue the Birth Certificate afresh and it will not be in violation of section 15 of the above said Act. As such, we do not find any merit in the appeal filed by the Commissioner of Pallavaram Municipality and the same is dismissed. Accordingly, the writ appeal is dismissed. The appellant-Commissioner of Pallavaram Municipality is to do the needful as directed by the learned Single Judge within a period of fifteen days from today and issue the Birth Certificate afresh after changing the name and retaining the same date of birth as mentioned in the original entry. No costs. The connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed.