JUDGMENT : 1. To live with a man (woman) you hate is a slavery but to be compelled to submit to his (her) embraces is a misfortune too great even for slavery itself. 2. The matrimonial acrimonies involving more of psychological and behaviour problems do not always fit in well within the framework of statutory provisions specially when the courts are dealing with the case like the one in hand, namely divorce decree granted under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 on the ground of mental cruelty and desertion by the appellant wife. 3. Dimple & Subhash, the parties to the present matrimonial dispute & belonging to the respectable Agarwal families of Swaroopganj & Abu Road, got married on 13/5/2001. Soon they fell apart and after they started living separately & the marriage broke down, a son – Harsh was borne to them on 22/2/2002. The usual litigation channels in such marriage dispute ensued and an FIR no. 83/2006 was filed after four years of separation on 5/6/2006 in Police Station Swaroopganj for the alleged offences committed by the husband under Section 498-A, 406, 109 IPC read with Section 323 IPC. The members of the husband family remained in custody for 3-4 days and the charge sheet against them was filed in the competent court on 12/12/2006 & that case is still pending trial. The husband filed the divorce petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 on 8/9/2008, inter alia, on the ground of cruelty and desertion, while in the same divorce petition no.1/10 (65/2008), the present appellant-wife-Dimple filed her counter claim under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act seeking restitution of conjugal rights. 4. The Family Court of learned District Judge, Sirohi granted the divorce on the ground of cruelty committed by the wife-Dimple, while denying the ground of desertion by wife and also rejecting the counter claim filed by her under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act for restitution conjugal rights. 5. The respondent-husband-Subhash has not filed any cross objections for establishing desertion in the present appeal filed by the appellant-wife-Dimple aggrieved by the grant of divorce decree on the ground of cruelty and rejection of her application under Section 9 of the Act for seeking restitution of conjugal rights. 6. 5. The respondent-husband-Subhash has not filed any cross objections for establishing desertion in the present appeal filed by the appellant-wife-Dimple aggrieved by the grant of divorce decree on the ground of cruelty and rejection of her application under Section 9 of the Act for seeking restitution of conjugal rights. 6. Efforts were also made for reconciliation by this Court in Chambers as well as by the trained mediator in the Mediation Centre attached with this Court but the parties were unable to resolve their matrimonial dispute and, therefore, the present appeal was heard on merits. 7. The subsequent facts which have developed in the case after the marriage and the separation of the parties are that the respondent-husband is now said to be working in China for last more than 10 years and during the mediation talks he categorically stood by his stand to remain divorced & part ways from the appellant-wife, Dimple, but he expressed his willingness to pay her reasonable alimony for the maintenance of the appellant & son – Harsh, born out of this wedlock. 8. Assailing the judgment of learned District Judge, Sirohi dated 28/7/2011, Mr. H.M.Saraswat, learned counsel appearing for the appellant-wife, vehemently submitted that the learned court below has wrongly drawn the inference of any mental cruelty committed by the appellant-wife upon the respondent-husband merely because the cases under Domestic Violence Act and under Sections 498-A, 406, 109 IPC were filed by her due to the compelling circumstances and the facts arising by way of demand of dowry & physical mal-treatment given to her. Learned counsel Mr. H.M.Saraswat submitted that case under Sections 498-A & 406 IPC is still pending trial before the competent court & the orders for grant of monthly maintenance of Rs.1800/-have been made in her favour under the provisions of Domestic Violence Act and, thus, merely filing of criminal cases could not be said to be any mental cruelty committed by the wife-Dimple upon her husband-Subhash. The other important fact, which has formed the basis of divorce decree in favour of respondent-husband by the court below is the letter Ex.A/3 produced by the appellant-wife before the court below, purportedly written by the husband-Subhash to his sister-in-law (Bhabhi) Ms. Alka, wife of his elder brother, who is in the same age group of respondent-husband as a “love letter”. Alka, wife of his elder brother, who is in the same age group of respondent-husband as a “love letter”. The Court below treated it as a mental cruelty committed by wife by producing such a letter, which was not written by the respondent-Husband & it did not make out any case of illicit relationship of respondent-Subhas with his `Bhabhi' Ms. Alka but by making the said document public, she committed a mental cruelty upon the respondent-Subhash. Certain behavioral aspects of the appellant-wife were also held to be amounting to mental cruelty and these were found sufficient to grant the decree of divorce to the respondent-Subhash under Section 13 of the Act. 9. Mr. H.M.Saraswat, learned counsel for the appellant-wife also relied upon the judgments in the cases of Gurbux Singh vs. Harminder Kaur – 2010 DNJ (SC) 1134, Perminder Charan Singh vs. Harjit Kaur – 2003 (10)SCC 161 , Rani Raj Kaur vs. Kuldip Singh – 1984 DMC 168 (Delhi High Court), Ren Prakash vs. Mst. Sneh Lata – 2001 RLW (4) Raj. 145 and Somasekharan Nair vs. Thankamma – AIR 1998 (Kerala) 308. 10. On the other hand, Dr. A.A.Bhansali, learned counsel for the respondent-Subhash cited number of judgments, which are enumerated below, and vehemently contended that not only the false and frivolous cases were registered by the appellant-Wife but grave mental agony and cruelty was committed by her by falsely implicating the respondent-husband in so called illicit relationship with his `Bhabhi' – wife of his elder brother, even though they were living in a joint family and no such letter was ever written by him, which caused serious loss of reputation of the respondent-husband within the family & even in the outside world and he had to virtually leave the country for this reason and to seek employment in China. He urged that no quantified mental agony can be established in such cases and it depends upon the respect and stature of the family, where such things can cause tremendous loss of reputation & respondent husband and his family was of that level at Abu Road, where the entire family not only remained in jail for some period on account of false and frivolous cases but infamous publicity given to the family for the alleged illicit relationship between the respondent-Subhash and his own sister-in-law, Ms. Alka, a fact which was disputed & denied by both Ms.Alka & her husband Suresh. 11. Learned counsel for the respondent-husband, Mr. Bhansali also submitted that the learned court below has rightly treated the cumulative facts established by the respondent-husband as sufficient ground of mental cruelty caused to the respondent-husband and, therefore, the decree of divorce deserves to be maintained by this Court by dismissing the present appeal of the appellant-wife. 12. The judgments cited by the learned counsel for the respondent-husband in support of his various contentions are discussed here in below. (i) In Naveen Kohli vs. Neelu Kohli – 2006 (1) WLC (SC) 690 the Hon'ble Supreme Court while granting the decree of divorce in an appeal filed by the appellant-husband observed as under: “The expression 'cruelty' has been used in relation to human conduct or human behaviour. It is the conduct in relation to or in respect of matrimonial duties and obligations. Cruelty is a course or conduct of one, which is adversely affecting the other. The cruelty may be mental or physical, intentional or unintentional. If it is physical, the Court will have no problem in determining it. It is a question of fact and degree. If it is mental, the problem presents difficulties.......Ultimately, it is a matter of inference to be drawn by taking into account the nature of the conduct and its effect on the complaining spouse. However, there may be a case where the conduct complained of itself is bad enough and per se unlawful or illegal. Then the impact or injurious effect on the other spouse need not be enquired into or considered. In such cases, the cruelty will be established if the conduct itself is proved or admitted.” The Supreme Court further observed as under:- “..........All quarrels must be weighed from that point of view in determining what constitutes cruelty in each particular case and as noted above, always keeping in view the physical and mental conditions of the parties, their character and social status. A too technical and hypersensitive approach would be counter-productive to the institution of marriage. The Courts do not have to deal with ideal husbands and ideal wives. It has to deal with particular man and woman before it. A too technical and hypersensitive approach would be counter-productive to the institution of marriage. The Courts do not have to deal with ideal husbands and ideal wives. It has to deal with particular man and woman before it. The ideal couple or a mere ideal one will probably have no occasion to go to Matrimonial Court.” (ii) In Smt. Anita Jain vs. Rajendra Jain – 2010(2) CDR 833 (Raj.)(DB), the Division Bench of this Court upholding the judgment of learned Family Court granting decree of divorce to the respondent-husband observed as under:- “18. In this case, the appellant has not only instituted a number of cases against the respondent and his family members but she has also made allegations against the respondent regarding illicit relations with his Bhabhis and niece which are worst types of allegations and she has also admitted these allegations to be untrue. The conduct of the appellant clearly amounts to cruelty to the respondent. 19. In view of the above discussion, it is clear that the argument of learned counsel for the appellant that the appellant has not treated the respondent with cruelty has no force. There is also no substance in the argument of learned counsel for the appellant that the respondent has forgiven the appellant as no such evidence is available on the record. 20. From the analysis and evaluation of the entire evidence, it is clear that the appellant has resolved to live in agony only to make the life a miserable hell for the respondent as well. This type of adamant attitude leaves no manner of doubt that the appellant is bent upon treating the respondent with mental cruelty. It is thus clear that learned Family Court has not committed any error by deciding issue no.1 against the appellant.” (iii) In Rajesh Dodiwal vs. Smt. Sangeeta – 2007 (3) CDR 2344 (Raj.) (DB), the Division Bench of this Court while granting decree of divorce to the appellant-husband on the ground of cruelty observed as under:- “Both the husband and the wife have a right to expect certain amount of respect, a certain amount of love and affection from each other. However, in the present case the repeated verbal abuses, the repeated insults, the repeated physical assaults committed by the respondent upon the appellant are bound to shake the foundation of marriage. However, in the present case the repeated verbal abuses, the repeated insults, the repeated physical assaults committed by the respondent upon the appellant are bound to shake the foundation of marriage. No person likes to be publicly humiliated or likes to be subjected to cruel treatment. In the present case the appellant has been cursed, assaulted and verbally abused in front of his friends and neighbors. Even the appellant's parents have been subjected to verbal abuses. The respondent has failed to perform her household responsibilities of providing food and comfort to the in-laws. She has levelled the allegations of infidelity against her husband and of molestation against her younger brother-in-law. She seems to have lodged criminal complaints against the appellant and his family members only after the divorce petition was filed by the appellant. Prima facie it seems that such steps were taken by her with an ulterior motive. These acts would certainly tantamounts to mental cruelty. Such acts are sufficient to convince the appellant that it is not possible for him to continue the marriage.” (iv) In Smt. Indu Mishra & anr. vs. Kovid Kumar Gaur & Anr. -2006(2) CDR 1249 (Raj.) (DB), another Division Bench of this Court while dismissing the appeal of the appellant-Wife against the decree of divorce granted by the learned Family Court observed in para 12 and 14 as under:- “12. The trial court has found as a fact that the allegation of illicit relations of the respondent-husband with his Bhabhi is totally false and baseless and the appellants have failed to prove this allegation against the respondent husband. 14. Thus, in the instant case, the very fact that a totally false and baseless allegation has been levelled against the respondent-husband by the wife about his having illicit relations with his Bhabhi clearly tantamounts to cruelty on her part to the respondent-husband and the respondent-husband is entitled to a decree of divorce on this ground as well.” This judgment is on all fours with the facts of the present case. (v) In Smt. Alka Dadhich vs. Ajay Dadhich – 2007 (3) CDR 2322 (Raj.) (DB), the another Division Bench of this Court again while upholding the decree of divorce granted by the learned Family Court, Ajmer, observed in para 20 as under:- 20. (v) In Smt. Alka Dadhich vs. Ajay Dadhich – 2007 (3) CDR 2322 (Raj.) (DB), the another Division Bench of this Court again while upholding the decree of divorce granted by the learned Family Court, Ajmer, observed in para 20 as under:- 20. Having considered the alleged conduct of wife in the background of social status of the parties, their education, physical and mental conditions, customs and traditions we find that it amounts to cruelty. We are satisfied from the material on record that the relationship between the parties had deteriorated to such an extent due to conduct of the wife that it would be impossible for them to live together without mental agony, torture or distress. After dragging the husband and his old parents in to the prison, the wife cannot expect to reconcile the marital ties. Having tied nuptial knot the spouses are supposed to perform social, religious and spiritual duties but in the instant case neither such duties were performed nor did new relationship of love, affection, care and concern between the spouses ever created.” (vi) In Mamta Goyal vs. Ramgopal – 2011 (3) CDR 1252 (Raj.), a coordinate bench of this Court affirming the decree of divorce granted by the leaned District Judge, Dholpur observed in para 23 to 25 as under:- “23. I called the parties to marriage and made an effort to explore the possibility of reconciliation. They were given sufficient time. Albeit, the wife expressed her desire to live with the respondent-husband, but the respondent-husband was not at all prepared to live together even for a moment. Though the appellant-wife showed her willingness to live with the respondent-husband, but the manner, in which she presented herself on two or three dates of hearing in the Court and spoke always bitter about her husband, it cannot be said that she was serious about her willingness. 24. The appellant-wife is also found to have lodged one FIR with the Police Station, Basedi for the offences under Section 498A and 406 of Indian Penal Code, wherein the respondent- husband and his mother and father were arrested and remained in jail. The appellant-wife in the Court itself exhibited her adamant and callous attitude towards her husband, which leaves no manner of doubt in my mind that the appellant-wife is bent upon treating the respondent-husband with mental cruelty. The appellant-wife in the Court itself exhibited her adamant and callous attitude towards her husband, which leaves no manner of doubt in my mind that the appellant-wife is bent upon treating the respondent-husband with mental cruelty. It is abundantly clearly that the marriage between the parties had broken down irretrievably and there is no chance of their coming together or living together again. 25. When we take into consideration aforementioned factors along-with an important circumstance that the parties have been admittedly living separately for more than 13 years, the irresistible conclusion would be that matrimonial bond has been ruptured beyond repair because of the mental cruelty caused by the appellant-wife. In view of above, the impugned judgment is found to be just and proper, which suffers from no infirmity. I am in full unison with the findings arrived at by the learned trial court and to my view too, it warrants no intervention. This case also squarely applies to the facts of the present case. (vi) In Smt. Abha Agarwal vs. Sunil Agarwal – 2001 (1) CCC 266 (Allahabad), the Division Bench of Allahabad High Court in para 24 observed as under:- “24. On consideration of the arguments articulated across the bar in the light of the available material, our view tuned by the evidence on record and related circumstances is for endorsing the finding of the lower Court that a case is strongly made out for the dissolution of the marriage of the couple by the decree of divorce on the ground of cruelty caused by the wife to the husband. Really speaking, it is not a case of physical cruelty, but of mental one. Various instances referred to by the husband are not in nature of ordinary quarrels between the husband and wife. They are quite serious and demanding, constituting mental cruelty. Mental cruelty is capable of causing even more grievous injury. In the present case, mental cruelty caused by the wife to the husband is clearly perceptible from the whole facts emerging out of her misconduct and misbehaviour in daily life. Hers was not a single act of misconduct or misbehaviour. Rather the same formed a series of acts spread over a period of time. We are clear in our mind that her misbehaviour and misconduct tended to destroy the legitimate ends and objects of matrimony. It is not merely the incompatibility of temperament. Hers was not a single act of misconduct or misbehaviour. Rather the same formed a series of acts spread over a period of time. We are clear in our mind that her misbehaviour and misconduct tended to destroy the legitimate ends and objects of matrimony. It is not merely the incompatibility of temperament. She did not make any allegation regarding the character of her husband but came up with a bogus defence of having been ill-treated by her husband and in-laws over the demand of dowry. It is obvious that she raised this false plea to cover up her own cruelty heaped upon the husband. Her conduct was unnerving for the husband producing telling adverse effect on his mental faculties. There is irreparable breakdown in the matrimonial tie. Fountain of love and affection between the couple has completely dried up. The stage of irreversibility and irretrievability has reached and the blame squarely lies at the door of the wife who had been most inconsiderate and selfish. The marriage between the couple has to be dissolved by a decree of divorce on the ground of cruelty caused by the wife to the husband.” 13. The judgments cited by the learned counsel for the appellant-wife are also discussed in brief hereunder. (i) In Gurubux Singh vs. Harminder Kaur – 2010 DNJ (SC) 1134 – the Hon'ble Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by the Husband – Gurubux Singh and held that marriage cannot be dissolved only on the ground of abusing the parents and leaving the matrimonial home without any justifiable reasons. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in para 14 and 15 observed as under:- “14) As regards the allegations about beating her child and not feeding him, the High Court, after analyzing the entire materials, disbelieved the same. It is also brought to our notice that the appellant condoned the alleged act of cruelty as he wanted to bring back the respondent to his house. As such, the allegations of cruelty do not appear to be truthful. It is also proved that the appellant is not interested to keep the respondent as his wife and he wants divorce by any means. As observed earlier, except the grounds enumerated in Section 13, a Hindu marriage solemnized under the Act cannot be dissolved on any other grounds. As such, the allegations of cruelty do not appear to be truthful. It is also proved that the appellant is not interested to keep the respondent as his wife and he wants divorce by any means. As observed earlier, except the grounds enumerated in Section 13, a Hindu marriage solemnized under the Act cannot be dissolved on any other grounds. 15) Finally, a feeble argument was made that both the appellant and respondent were living separately from 2002 and it would be impossible for their reunion, hence this Court exercising its jurisdiction under Article 142 of the Constitution their marriage may be dissolved in the interest of both parties. Though, on a rare occasion, this Court has granted the extraordinary relief de hors to the grounds mentioned in Section 13 in view of the fact that the issue has been referred to a larger Bench about permissibility of such course at present, we are not inclined to accede to the request of the appellant. If there is any change of law or additional ground included in Section 13 by the act of Parliament, the appellant is free to avail the same at the appropriate time.” In this case, the appellant-husband could not fairly establish the ground of cruelty committed by wife and the Hon'ble Supreme Court kept it open for the appellant to avail the remedy if there is any change of law or additional ground included in Section 13 of the Act by the Parliament. Therefore, this case is distinguishable on facts and is of no help to the present appellant-wife in the present case. (ii) In J.L.Nanda vs. Smt. Veena Nanda, reported in Supreme Court on Matrimonial Laws page 95, the Hon'ble Supreme Court while rejecting the appeal of the Husband held as under: “It is no doubt an unfortunate state of affairs but it could not be held that the respondent was behaving with the appellant in a manner which could be termed as cruelty which would entitle the appellant to a decree for divorce. Sometimes the temperament of the parties may not be conducive to each other which may result in petty quarrels and troubles although it was contended by the appellant that he had to suffer various ailments on account of this kind of behaviour meted out to him by the wife but it could not be held on A the basis of any material that ailment of the appellant was the direct result of her (respondent's) conduct. The Division Bench therefore was right in coming to the conclusion that there is no material to come to the conclusion that the respondent treated the appellant with such cruelty as would entitle him to a decree for divorce. In view of the facts and circumstances, therefore, the appeal is devoid of merit. It is therefore dismissed. In this case also, the cruelty could not be established by the Husband and the Hon'ble Supreme Court observed that there is no material to conclude that the ailment suffered by the husband was the direct result of the conduct of the wife and the behaviour of the wife with appellant-husband in such a manner could not be termed cruelty. Therefore, this case is also of no help to the present appellant-wife to get the reversal of the decree of divorce in the present case. (iii) In Perminder Charan Singh vs. Harjit Kaur – 2003 (10) SCC 161 , Hon'ble Supreme Court observed as under: “.......Unfortunately, the Court did not enter a specific finding that there was cruelty on the part of respondent. Despite the absence of this finding, the trial court granted divorce to the appellant and the same was rightly been set aside by the learned Single Judge. The learned Single Judge elaborately considered the matter and held that there was no cruelty on the part of the respondent......... The learned Single Judge found that the various allegations made in the petitions were not satisfactorily proved and the conduct of the appellant was not certainly above board.” This case is also distinguishable on facts as in the present case the trial court, on the basis of evidence, categorically reached to the conclusion that the respondent wife committed cruelty on the appellant husband and that the conduct of the appellant-husband in the present case was not such so as to deny him the decree of divorce on the ground of cruelty. (iv) In Rani Raj Kaur vs. Kuldip Singh – 1 (1984) D.M.C. 168, the Delhi High Court observed as under:- “50. In what are called in colloquial language “mental cruelty” cases there must be present in the charge of cruelty the danger – to – health element. How far a spouse has departed from the normal standards of kindness and self-control that are the basis of the married life and how great is the cumulative effect of that departure on the other spouse before it constitutes cruelty is always a question of degree, depending largely on the temperament, circumstances and health of each party. What do we find here ? A thick skinned husband. Complete absence of normal kindness and consideration. No normal civility to the wife. On the part of the wife it was atrocious to prefer the charge of illicit intimacy of the husband with his own mother. There were faults on both sides. They were both difficult people. Both have their grievances against each other. But that does not prove that the wife was cruel. If without the presence of danger –to-health element the courts were to grant divorce on the ground of cruelty a heavy toll would be levied on the institution of matrimony.” This case also has no application on the facts of the present case in hand and, therefore, the same is of no assistance to the learned counsel for the appellant-wife. (v) In Ren Prakash vs. Mst. Sneh Lata – RLW 2001 (4) (Raj.) 145, the Division Bench of this Court dismissed the appeal of the husband while observing as under: “No grave and weighty incidents which can amount of cruelty. Every little act which is mere triviality cannot be made ground upon which Court can pass a decree of divorce under Section 13(1) (i-a) on the ground of cruelty. On the contrary, the conduct of the petitioner himself establishes his cruelty with his wife.” (vi) Lastly, learned counsel for the appellant-wife relied upon the judgment of Kerala High court in the case of Somasekharan Nair vs. Thankamma – AIR 1988 Kerala 308, in which the Division Bench of Kerala High Court dismissed the appeal of the appellant-husband on the ground that he failed to establish any of the grounds given in Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act. The Court observed in para 9 as under:- “9. The Court observed in para 9 as under:- “9. In the instant case the allegation seems to have some basis. Some of the letters alleged to be written by the respondent have been produced in this case. In many of such letters the allegations against the appellant are seen made. One letter purported to have been written by the father of the respondent also is seen produced. Therein also this sort of allegation has been made against the appellant. From the correspondence it appaers that these allegations had been made since long time. Considering the relationship between the parties, we do not think that these allegations can be termed as cruelty meted out to the appellant. The appellant also has alleged that the respondent had caused bodily injury to him. For that also, there is absolutely no acceptable evidence.” 14. This Court does not find any similarity of the cited judgments with the case in hand. 15. It would be now appropriate to reproduce the relevant findings of the court below on the point of mental cruelty in the impugned judgment dated 28/7/2011. For that also, there is absolutely no acceptable evidence.” 14. This Court does not find any similarity of the cited judgments with the case in hand. 15. It would be now appropriate to reproduce the relevant findings of the court below on the point of mental cruelty in the impugned judgment dated 28/7/2011. For that also, there is absolutely no acceptable evidence.” 14. This Court does not find any similarity of the cited judgments with the case in hand. 15. It would be now appropriate to reproduce the relevant findings of the court below on the point of mental cruelty in the impugned judgment dated 28/7/2011. ^^fook|d la[;k ,d %& 10- bl fook|d fcUnq dks fl} djus dk Hkkj izkFkhZ ij gS vkSj izkFkhZ us viuh ;kfpdk esa izdV vk/kkjksa dks gh vius eq[; ijh{kk:ih ‘kiFki= ,-M- 1 lqHkk”k esa dfFkr djrs gq, mldh v{kj’k% iqf”V dh gS vkSj leFkZuLo:i vizkFkhZ;k }kjk mlds fo:} ngst dh ekax dk >wBk eqdnek ntZ djok;k] ftldh vafre ifj.kke dh izekf.kr izfrfyfi izn’kZ&1] izFkelwpuk fjiksVZ dh izekf.kr izfrfyfi izn’kZ&2] ifjokfn;k }kjk izLrqr ifjokn dh izekf.kr izfrfyfi izn’kZ&3] /kkjk 161 n-iz-la- ds c;ku dh izn’kZ&4] mlds] mlds firk] mldh ekrk] mldh HkkHkh dh fxjrkjh dh QnsZ izn’kZ ih&5 ls izn’kZ ih&8 QnZ cjkenxh izn’kZ ih&9 o izn’kZ ih&10 iqfyl v/kh{kd fljksgh dks >wBk fy[kk izkFkZuki= izn’kZ&11] vizkFkhZ;k }kjk izLrqr ?kjsyw fgalk dk izkFkZuki= izn’kZ&12 ,oa /kkjk 12 ?kjsyw fgalk dk izkFkZuki= izn’kZ&13] /kkjk 125 n-iz-la- esa vUrfje vkns’k dh izekf.kr izfrfyfi izn’kZ&14] mlds ikliksVZ dh izekf.kr izfrfyfi izn’kZ&15] vizkFkhZ;k }kjk izLrqr iqfyl v/kh{kd fljksgh dks fnukad 09-03-10- dks fn;k izkFkZuki= izn’kZ&16 ,oa vfrfjDr iqfyl v/kh{kd fljksgh ds i= izn’kZ&17 dks iznf’kZr djok;k x;k gSA ftjg esa mlus ;g Lohdkj fd;k gS fd mlus vizkFkhZ;k dks ykus dh dksbZ dk;Zokgh ugha dh] lh/ks gh ;g rykd dh dk;Zokgh dh gS rFkk izn’kZ&14 vkns’k gksus ds igys gh mlus fookg&foPNsn dh dk;Zokgh dj nh FkhA mYys[kuh; gS fd izn’kZ&14 /kkjk 125 n-iz-la- varfje Hkj.kiks”k.k Hkrk laca/kh vkns’k gSA mlus ;g Lohdkj fd;k gS fd /kkjk 498,] 406 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk dk eqdnek fi.MokMk dksVZ esa py jgk gS ijUrq og eqdnek >wBk gSA ?kjsyw fgalk dk eqdnek izn’kZ&12 Hkh U;k;ky; esa py jgk gSA bl ckr dks Lohdkj fd;k fd mlds iq= g”kZ dk tUe l:ixat esa gqvk FkkA Lor% dgk fd vizkFkhZ;k ckj&ckj Hkkxdj vius ihgj pyh tkrh Fkh bl dkj.k g”kZ dk tUe l:ixat esa gqvkA muds ifjokj esa ;g fjokt gS fd iq= dk tUe muds ?kj ij gh gksuk pkfg;s ,oa muds lekt esa vk.kk dh dksbZ izFkk ugha gksrh gSA mlus vizkFkhZ ;k mlds iq= ds Hkj.kiks”k.k dh dksbZ O;oLFkk ugha dh rFkk mlus vius iq= ds tUefnu ij dksbZ fxV ugha HkstkA izn’kZ&,2 iphZ mlus rS;kj djk;h Fkh ;k ugha] ;g mls irk ughaA Lor% dgk fd izn’kZ&,2 iphZ Fkh ;k nwljh Fkh ;g irk ugha] mldh iRuh xHkZorh Fkh blfy, mldk VsLV djokus gsrq og ysdj x;k FkkA bl ckr dks xyr crk;k fd fnukad 21-06-02 dks mldh iRuh xHkZorh ugha gks fQj dgk fd fnukad ij dksbZ fxV ugha HkstkA izn’kZ&,2 iphZ mlus rS;kj djk;h Fkh ;k ugha] ;g mls irk ughaA Lor% dgk fd izn’kZ&,2 iphZ Fkh ;k nwljh Fkh ;g irk ugha] mldh iRuh xHkZorh Fkh blfy, mldk VsLV djokus gsrq og ysdj x;k FkkA bl ckr dks xyr crk;k fd fnukad 21-06-02 dks mldh iRuh xHkZorh ugha gks fQj dgk fd fnukad 21-06-01 dh ckr le> jgk gaw fnukad 21-06-02 dks rks ;g vizkFkhZ;k dks tujy pSdvi djokus ds fy, ysdj x;k FkkA izn’kZ&,3 i= dh fy[kkoV mlds gkFk dh ugha gS] mDr i= mlus ugha fy[kk gS vkSj ;g i= muds ifjokj ds fdlh Hkh lnL; ds gkFk dk fy[kk gqvk ugha gSA bl ckr dks xyr crk;k fd izn’kZ&,3 i= mldh HkkHkh vydk us fMEiy dks fn;k gksA bl ckr dks xyr crk;k fd mlds o mldh HkkHkh ds e/; dksbZ voS/k laca/k gksA tc fMEiy us mlds o mldh HkkHkh dks ysdj >wBs vkjksi yxk,] mu >wBs vkjksiksa dh tkudkjh mls eqdnek djus ij gqbZ ,oa mlds igys Hkh eqd&tqckuh vkjksi yxkus ls gqbZ FkhA bl ckr dks Lohdkj fd;k fd /kkjk 125 n-iz-la- dh dk;Zokgh foi{kh;k }kjk fd;s tkus ij mldk tokc fn;s tkus ds djhc lkr ekg ckn mlus ;g rykd dh ;kfpdk is’k dh gSA ;g mls irk ugha fd fMEiy ds firkth o nks HkkbZ ,d nqdku ij cSBdj lkFk esa O;olk; djrs gksA fMEiy us mls ‘kknh gksrs gh nl&iUnzg fnu ckn ;g dguk ‘kq: fd;k fd l:ixat pyks vkSj ogka tkdj O;olk; djks ,oa l:ixat esa gh jgks fdUrq og O;olk; gsrq l:ixat dHkh ugha x;kA fMEiy us iwjs ifjokj ds lkFk gh xkyhxykSp o dzwjrk djuk ‘kq: dj fn;k Fkk bl dkj.k ifjokj ds lHkh lnL; tkurs FksA bl ckr dks xyr crk;k fd mlds HkkHkh ds dksbZ lUrku ugha gksus ds dkj.k mUgksaus fMEiy ij nokc Mkyk gks fd rw Hkh fM,Ulh vFkkZr xHkZikr djok ysA bl ckr dks Hkh xyr crk;k fd fMEiy viuk cPpk cpkus ds fy, ihgj vius HkkbZ ds lkFk xbZ gksA bl ckr dks xyr crk;k fd mlus o mlds ifjokjtu us fMEiy ls ngst dh dksbZ ekax gks vkSj mlds lkFk fMEiy us dHkh dksbZ dzwjrk ugha dh gksA izkFkhZ ds mijksDr dFkuksa dh iqf”V mlds lxs HkkbZ lqjs’k ,-M- 2 ,oa mlds firk osnizdk’k ,-M- 4 rks vius c;kuksa esa iw.kZr;k djrs gh gS] ,-M- 3 ds :i esa mldh HkkHkh vydk us Hkh fd mlus o mlds ifjokjtu us fMEiy ls ngst dh dksbZ ekax gks vkSj mlds lkFk fMEiy us dHkh dksbZ dzwjrk ugha dh gksA izkFkhZ ds mijksDr dFkuksa dh iqf”V mlds lxs HkkbZ lqjs’k ,-M- 2 ,oa mlds firk osnizdk’k ,-M- 4 rks vius c;kuksa esa iw.kZr;k djrs gh gS] ,-M- 3 ds :i esa mldh HkkHkh vydk us Hkh ;g dFku fd;k gS fd vizkFkhZ;k us fookg ds dqN le; i’pkr~ ls gh muds lkFk xkyhxykSp o >xM+k&Qalkn djuk ‘kq: fd;k ,oa vizkFkhZ;k us Li”V :i ls mls ,oa lqHkk”k dks ;g dg fn;k fd ;fn lqHkk”k mlds firk ds ?kj ij ugha jgrk gS rks og ?kj NksM+dj pyh tk;sxh rFkk iwjs ifjokj dks ngst ds >wBs eqdnesa ,oa vU; eqdneksa esa Qalk nsxhA mUgksaus dkQh le>k;k ysfdu og ugha ekuh rFkk vUr esa fnukad 22-06-2002 dks vius HkkbZ ds lkFk vius ihgj l:ixat pyh xbZA mlds lqHkk”k ds lkFk voS/k laca/k gksus dk fcYdqy >wBk o eu?kMUr vkjksi yxk;k gSA vizkFkhZ;k us >wBs i= lqHkk”k ds uke ls cuokdj U;k;ky; esa is’k fd;s gSA lqHkk”k us dHkh Hkh dksbZ i= mls ugha fy[kk vkSj u gh dksbZ i= fn;k gSA mlus dksbZ i= ,oa vizkFkhZ;k }kjk U;k;ky; esa izLrqr i= vizkFkhZ;k dks fn;k gSA vizkFkhZ;k us lqHkk”k] ml ij ,oa muds ifjokj ds fo:} ngst dk >wBk eqdnek ntZ djokdj muds ifjokj ds lnL;ksa dks fxjrkj djok fn;k tcfd muds }kjk vizkFkhZ;k ls dHkh Hkh ngst dh ekaxuh ugha dh gSA blh izdkj ?kjsyw fgalk vkfn dh Hkh fjiksVZ o eqdnek >wBk fd;k x;k gSA ,-M- 5 izkFkhZ ds pkpk egsUnzdqekj Hkh bl ckr dh iqf”V djrk gS fd fookg ds dqN le; ckn ls gh lqHkk”k dks fMEiy ds ihgj l:ixat esa jgus ,oa mlds firk ds lkFk O;olk; izkjaHk djus ds fy, ncko Mkyuk ‘kq: dj fn;k ,oa fMEiy fcuk fdlh dkj.k ds lqHkk”k o mlds ?kjokyksa ds lkFk xkyhxykSp o >xMk&Qalkn djrh vkSj mls le>kus ij Hkh ugha ekuh rFkk fMEiy us Li”V :i ls mUgsa dg fn;k fd ;fn lqHkk”k mlds firk ds ?kj l:ixat esa ugha jgrk gS rks og ?kj NksM+dj pyh tk;sxh ,oa iwjs ifjokj dks ngst ds >wBs eqdnes esa Qalk nsxhA fMEiy ds fnukad 22-06-2002 dks ihgj tkus ds dqN fnu ckn os yksx le>kus x;s Fks ysfdu og ugha ekuhA bl xokg ls tks izfrijh{kk vizkFkhZ;k dh vksj ls dh xbZ gS] muls mlds eq[; c;kuksa dk ?kj l:ixat esa ugha jgrk gS rks og ?kj NksM+dj pyh tk;sxh ,oa iwjs ifjokj dks ngst ds >wBs eqdnes esa Qalk nsxhA fMEiy ds fnukad 22-06-2002 dks ihgj tkus ds dqN fnu ckn os yksx le>kus x;s Fks ysfdu og ugha ekuhA bl xokg ls tks izfrijh{kk vizkFkhZ;k dh vksj ls dh xbZ gS] muls mlds eq[; c;kuksa dk dksbZ fo’ks”k [k.Mu ugha gksrk D;ksafd djhc&djhc mlls ftjg dh xbZ gS tks izkFkhZ ls dh xbZ gSA izn’kZ&3 ds ckjs esa xokg ,-MCY;w- 3 vydk us Li”V :i ls bUdkj fd;k gS fd mls ;g i= lqHkk”k us fy[kk gks vkSj mlus ;g i= izn’kZ&,3 vizkFkhZ;k dks fn;k gksA bl ckr dks xyr crk;k gS fd mlds o lqHkk”k ds e/; voS/k laca/k gksus ls fMEiy o lqHkk”k ds chp fookn gqvk gksA bl ckr dks Hkh xyr crk;k gS fd mlds cPpk ugha gks ldrk gksA 11- blds [k.MuLo:i ,u-,-M- 1 fMEiy us vius eq[; ijh{k.k esa vius vfHkopuksa dh iqf”V djrs gq, ;g Li”V dFku fd;k gS fd mlus fdlh izdkj dh dksbZ dzwjrk izkFkhZ i{k ds lkFk ugha dh vfirq mlls 15 yk[k :i;s ysdj vius dk dgdj bykt ugha djk;k x;k rks og etcwj gksdj vius HkkbZ ds lkFk ihgj xbZ ,oa mldh lkl us mlds HkkbZ dks dgk fd bykt djkvks ,oa 15 yk[k :i;s gks rks gh okfil ykukA ml ij xHkZ fxjkus dk nokc Mkyk x;k ftlds fy, og rS;kj ugha gqbZ ftl ij izkFkhZ i{k }kjk mlds lkFk >xM+k fd;k x;k ,oa mlds iq= dk tUe ihgj esa gqvk gSA mlds o mlds iq= dh fdlh izdkj ds Hkj.kiks”k.k dh O;oLFkk ugha dh gS rc mlus QkStnkjh dk;Zokgh dh gS tks iw.kZr;k fof/klEer gS] og viuk ?kj clkuk pkgrh Fkh blfy, mlus iqfyl v/kh{kd dks Hkh i= fy[ks FksA mlus vius dFkuksa ds leFkZuLo:i miv/kh{kd vkcwioZr }kjk le>kb’k ds rgr dh xbZ dk;Zokgh dh izekf.kr izfrfyfi izn’kZ&,1] vius bykt dh iphZ vly izn’kZ&,2] lqHkk”k }kjk mldh HkkHkh ds uke fyf[kr i= izn’kZ&,3] mlds iq= ccw ds egkohj vLirky lqesjiqj esa djok, bykt dh iphZ izn’kZ&,4] mlds }kjk vius firk dks fy[kk i= izn’kZ&,5 ,oa mlds }kjk iqfyl v/kh{kd ikyh dks izLrqr i= dh izfr izn’kZ&,6 izLrqr dh gSA ftjg esa ;g Lohdkj fd;k gS fd mlds llqjky ls vkus ds ckn mlus izkFkhZ lqHkk”k ij Hkj.kiks”k.k dk nkok fd;k Fkk fdUrq mlls igys mldks uksfVl ugha fn;k] efgyk ijke’kZ dsUnz fljksgh bykt dh iphZ izn’kZ&,4] mlds }kjk vius firk dks fy[kk i= izn’kZ&,5 ,oa mlds }kjk iqfyl v/kh{kd ikyh dks izLrqr i= dh izfr izn’kZ&,6 izLrqr dh gSA ftjg esa ;g Lohdkj fd;k gS fd mlds llqjky ls vkus ds ckn mlus izkFkhZ lqHkk”k ij Hkj.kiks”k.k dk nkok fd;k Fkk fdUrq mlls igys mldks uksfVl ugha fn;k] efgyk ijke’kZ dsUnz fljksgh esa dk;Zokgh dh Fkh ijUrq dkSulh rkjh[k o ekg esa ;g dk;Zokgh dh Fkh] mls ;kn ugha gSA mlus fnukad 09-03-2006 dks iqfyl v/kh{kd fljksgh dks izn’kZ&11 ,oa mlds ckn fnukad 24-04-2006 dks iqfyl v/kh{kd ikyh dks izn’kZ&,6 fjiksVZ nh Fkh ijUrq muls igys dksbZ uksfVl izkFkhZ dks ugha fn;kA mlds ckn mlus ifr] lkl&llqj] tsB&tsBkuh ,oa uun&uunksbZ vkfn ij izn’kZ&,3 tqeZ nQk 498,] 406 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk dk eqdnek fi.MokMk dksVZ esa izn’kZ&3 is’k fd;k Fkk ijUrq ;g mls irk ugha fd mlds }kjk mDr eqdnek djus ij ml izdj.k esa mlds ifr] tsB&tsBkuh ,oa lkl&llqj fxjrkj gq, gksA mlus ?kjsyw fgalk dh dk;Zokgh bu yksxksa ds fo:} fi.MokMk dksbZ esa izn’kZ&12 dh Fkh ,oa mlds ckn mlds ifr us rykd dh ;kfpdk is’k dh gSA mlus izn’kZ&11 ,oa izn’kZ&,6 esa lqHkk”k o mlds llqjky okyksa }kjk ngst esa 15 yk[k :i;s ekaxus dh ckr ugha fy[kk;h Fkh D;ksafd og llqjky tkuk pkgrh FkhA mlds eq[; ijh{k.k:ih ‘kiFki= ds in la[;k pkj esa lqHkk”k }kjk mldh HkkHkh dks i= fy[kus dh tks ckr mlus fy[kh gS og i= mls Lo;a vydk us fn;k Fkk tks i= izn’kZ&,3 gSA bl ckr dks xyr crk;k gS fd mlus izn’kZ& ,3 i= ngst] ?kjsyw fgalk o /kkjk 125 n-iz-la- ds eqdnesa esa is’k ugha fd;k gksA vydk us mls i= izn’kZ&,3 fdl rkjh[k] eghuk o lky esa fn;k Fkk] og mls ;kn ugha gS ysfdu ‘kknh ds dqN fnuksa ckn mls vydk us fn;k Fkk tks i= mlus vius HkkbZ egohjizlkn tks lqesjiqj esa O;kikj ds dke esa vk;k Fkk] mldks fn;k FkkA lqHkk”k ds isUV dh tsc esa i= mlus fudkyk Fkk ogh i= izn’kZ&,3 FkkA Lor% dgk fd mDr i= mls HkkHkh vydk us fn;s FksA mlus izn’kZ&3 ns[kdj dgk fd blds in la[;k ukS esa vydk HkkHkh }kjk lqHkk”k dk i= nsus dh ckr fy[kus ls jg xbZ gS] vfirq mlesa ekSdk feyus ij lqHkk”k dh isUV dh tsc ls fudkyk gqvk gSA izn’kZ&4 iqfyl c;ku dk , ls ch Hkkx ^^,d i= ?kj esa feyk** ;g lqudkj xokg mls HkkHkh vydk us fn;s FksA mlus izn’kZ&3 ns[kdj dgk fd blds in la[;k ukS esa vydk HkkHkh }kjk lqHkk”k dk i= nsus dh ckr fy[kus ls jg xbZ gS] vfirq mlesa ekSdk feyus ij lqHkk”k dh isUV dh tsc ls fudkyk gqvk gSA izn’kZ&4 iqfyl c;ku dk , ls ch Hkkx ^^,d i= ?kj esa feyk** ;g lqudkj xokg us dgk fd ;g xyr fy[kk gS] ,slk c;ku mlus iqfyl dks ugha fn;kA ;kfpdk ds tokc ,oa izn’kZ&3 ifjokn esa vydk }kjk i= fn;k tks mlus lqHkk”k dks fn;k ,oa okfil lqHkk”k dh isUV esa ls fudkyk] ;g ckr fy[kh gqbZ ugha gSA mlus bl ckr dks Lohdkj fd;k fd tokc;kfpdk o dkm.VjDyse esa 1]81]000@& :i;s Qsjs ds oDr mlds llqjkyokyksa }kjk ekaxus dh ckr ugha fy[kkbZ gS D;ksafd lqHkk”k us viuh ;kfpdk esa bldk mYys[k ugha fd;k] bl dkj.k mlus mDr ckr ugha fy[kk;hA cPpk gksus ds ckn mls mlds llqjky okys ysus ugha vk;s] mldk HkkbZ egkohjizlkn tc cPpk nks ekg dk gks x;k Fkk rc mls NksM+us vk;k FkkA fnukad 21-06-2002 dks og chekj gqbZ] mlds dqN fnu ckn mldk HkkbZ egkohjizlkn mlds llqjky vk;k ftlls mldh lkl us ;g dgk fd bldk bykt djkvks vkSj 15 yk[k :i;s gks rks ysdj vkus dks dgk FkkA bl ckr dks xyr crk;k fd mlds fo:} mlds llqjkyokyksa us xHkZikr djkus dk dksbZ nokc ugha Mkyk gks ,oa mlus muds fo:} >wBs vkjksi yxk;s gksA mlus vius ihgjokyksa dks xHkZikr djkus okyh ckr Qksu ls ugha dgh] i= fy[kdj dgh ijUrq og i= fdl rkjh[k] eghus esa mlus fy[kk Fkk ;g vkt ;kn ugha gSA mlus izn’kZ&,5 i= egkohjizlkn dks mlds ihgjokyksa dks nsus ds fy, fn;k Fkk] ;g ckr ;kfpdk ds tokc o dkm.VjDyse esa fy[kh gqbZ ugha gS D;ksafd ewy ;kfpdk esa tks fy[kk Fkk mlh dk mlus tokc fn;k Fkk] nwljh ckrsa fy[kuk mlus vko’;d ugha le>k bl dkj.k ugha fy[kk;hA bl ckr dks Hkh Lohdkj fd;k fd izn’kZ&11 o izn’kZ&,6 esa Hkh izn’kZ&,5 i= dk gokyk ugha gSA bl ckr dks xyr crk;k fd mlus izn’kZ&11 o izn’kZ&,6 esa xHkZ fxjkus dk nokc Mkyus dh ckr i= ls u nsdj VsyhQksu ls nsus dh ckr fy[kh gksA bl ckr dks xyr crk;k fd mlus izn’kZ&,3 o izn’kZ&,5 i= eqdnek cukus ds fy, o vU; dk;Zokfg;ksa ds fy, >wBs rS;kj fd;s gksA bl ckr dks xyr crk;k fd mlus tokc o vU; dk;Zokfg;ksa esa mlds mlus izn’kZ&11 o izn’kZ&,6 esa xHkZ fxjkus dk nokc Mkyus dh ckr i= ls u nsdj VsyhQksu ls nsus dh ckr fy[kh gksA bl ckr dks xyr crk;k fd mlus izn’kZ&,3 o izn’kZ&,5 i= eqdnek cukus ds fy, o vU; dk;Zokfg;ksa ds fy, >wBs rS;kj fd;s gksA bl ckr dks xyr crk;k fd mlus tokc o vU; dk;Zokfg;ksa esa mlds ifr o tsBkuh ij >wBs vkjksi yxk;s gks vfirq tks ns[kk Fkk ogh fy[kk FkkA bl ckr dks xyr crk;k fd mlls ngst dh dksbZ ekax ugha xbZ gksA izn’kZ&11 esa , ls ch Hkkx ^^lc fj’rsnkjksa ds izs’kj ls mlds llqjky okys mls ysdj x;s** ;g Vkbi ls xyr fy[kk x;k gSA rFkk izn’kZ&,6 dk , ls ch Hkkx ^^nks ekg ckn llqjky okys ysdj x;s** ;g xyr fy[kk gS fdUrq pkj ekg llqjky jgh] ;g lgh fy[kk gSA ,u-,-M- 3 ds :i esa vizkFkhZ;k ds firk lR;ukjk;.k us Hkh vizkFkhZ;k ds mijksDr c;kuks dh iw.kZr;k iqf”V dh gS vkSj mlds HkkbZ ,u-,-M- 4 egkohjizlkn us Hkh djhc&djhc oSls gh c;ku nsrs gq, vizkFkhZ;k ds dFkuksa dh iqf”V dh gS rFkk buls izkFkhZ i{k dh vksj ls dh xbZ tokc esa oSlk gh tokc vk;k gS tSlk vizkFkhZ;k us viuh ftjg esa crk;k gSA 12- bl izdkj gekjh jk; esa nksuksa gh i{kksa dh vksj ls vkbZ mijksDr lk{; ijk muds }kjk izLrqr fof/kd O;oLFkkvksa esa izfrikfnr fl}kUrksa ds lkFk fopkj fd;k tkos rks ge bl fu”d”kZ ij igqaprs gS fd izkFkhZ i{k viuh ;kfpdk esa ^^dzwjrk** laca/kh vk{ksi dks HkyhHkkafr fl} djus esa lQy jgk gS D;ksafd bl ckcr~ izkFkhZ] mlds firk] HkkbZ] HkkHkh ,oa pkpk us Li”Vr% dFku fd;s gS vkSj muls foi{kh;k dh vksj ls tks ftjg dh xbZ gS] muls ;g fu”d”kZ ugha fudyrk fd muds crk, vuqlkj vizkFkhZ;k }kjk muds lkFk O;ogkj ugha fd;k x;k gksA vizkFkhZ;k dh vksj ls tks lk{; vkbZ gS] mlls Hkh bldk dksbZ [k.Mu ugha gksrk vfirq vizkFkhZ;k }kjk tks vkjksi yxk;s x;s gS] mlds lkFk ^^dzwjrk** dh xbZ] xHkZikr djkus ds fy, ml ij nckc Mkyk mldk [k.Mu rks mlds Lo;a }kjk gh vyx&vyx LFkkuksa esa fd;s x;s dFkuksa ls gks tkrk gSA bl rjQ rks og ;g dFku djrh gS fd mlus VsyhQksu ds tfj;s vius ifjokjtuksa dks bldh lwpuk nh Fkh] nwljh rjQ izn’kZ&,5 i= fy[kdj vius HkkbZ egkohjizlkn ls bldh lwpuk nh Fkh ,oa VsyhQksu laca/kh dgkuh xyr fy[kh gSA blds vykok og tks 15 rks mlds Lo;a }kjk gh vyx&vyx LFkkuksa esa fd;s x;s dFkuksa ls gks tkrk gSA bl rjQ rks og ;g dFku djrh gS fd mlus VsyhQksu ds tfj;s vius ifjokjtuksa dks bldh lwpuk nh Fkh] nwljh rjQ izn’kZ&,5 i= fy[kdj vius HkkbZ egkohjizlkn ls bldh lwpuk nh Fkh ,oa VsyhQksu laca/kh dgkuh xyr fy[kh gSA blds vykok og tks 15 yk[k :i;s ngst dh ekax djuk crkrh gS og dgkuh Hkh blfy, vk/kkjghu gS D;ksafd mlus tc izn’kZ&11 o izn’kZ&,6 iqfyl v/kh{kd dks o”kZ 2006 esa dh Fkh muesa Hkh ngst esa 15 yk[k :i;s ekaxus dh ckr fy[kh gqbZ ugha gS vkSj mlds ckcr~ mlds }kjk tks Li”Vhdj.k fn;k x;k gS fd og llqjky tkuk pkgrh Fkh blfy;s mlus ;g ckr ugha fy[kk;hA gekjh jk; esa ;g fo’okl ds ;ksX; ugha gS D;ksafd tc vU; vkjksi yxk, tk ldrs gS rks ;g ngst okyh ckr Hkh mlesa vo’; fy[kh tkrhA bl izdkj gekjh jk; esa izkFkhZ i{k dh vksj ls izLrqr lk{; ls ;g rF; HkyhHkkafr fl} gks tkrk gS fd vizkFkhZ;k }kjk izkFkhZ ,oa mlds HkkHkh ds chp voS/k laca/k ckcr~ >wBs vkjksi le;≤ ij yxk;s x;s gS] tks izkFkhZ i{k ds vuqlkj ekSf[kd :i ls rks yxk;s gh x;s] mlds vykok i=koyh ds voyksdu ls ;g Li”V gS fd izn’kZ&3 bLrxklk tks eqLrxhlk Jherh fMEiy dh vksj ls U;k;ky; esa izLrqr fd;k x;k gS] mlds iSjk uacj&9 esa mlus ;g vafdr fd;k gS fd ^^eqyfte lqHkk”k ds viuh HkkHkh eqyftek vydk ls voS/k laca/k gS rFkk nksuksa vk;s fnu v’yhy gjdrs dj eqLrxhlk dks ekufld :i ls izrkfMr djrs jgrs gSA eqLrxhlk us eqyfte lqHkk”k ds gkFk dk fy[kk izsei= ,d fnu ekSdk feyus ij mldh isUV dh tsc ls fudkyk tks eqLrxhlk ds ikl esa gSA** blh izdkj izn’kZ&,4 c;ku Jherh fMEiy us tks fnukad 27-06-06 dks fn;k gS] mlesa Hkh mlus ;g dFku fd;k gS fd ^^’kknh ds dqN le; i’pkr~ mls llqjky esa mls ifr }kjk tsBkuh Jherh vydk iRuh lqjs’k dks fy[kk gqvk ,d i= ?kj esa feyk ftl i= dh QksVks izfr fjiksVZ ds lkFk layXu gS ,oa mlds i’pkr~ mldh tsBkuh Jherh vydk ,oa mlds ifr lqHkk”k dks vkil es v’yhy gjdrs djrs ,oa vkifrtud voLFkk esa ns[kk rc bldh f’kdk;r mlus vius lkl Jherh Qqyhnsoh ,oa llqj osnizdk’k dks dh exj mUgksusa bldh rjQ dksbZ /;ku ugha fn;k rFkk mldh lkl us mls dgk fd ;s rks ,sls gh djrs fjiksVZ ds lkFk layXu gS ,oa mlds i’pkr~ mldh tsBkuh Jherh vydk ,oa mlds ifr lqHkk”k dks vkil es v’yhy gjdrs djrs ,oa vkifrtud voLFkk esa ns[kk rc bldh f’kdk;r mlus vius lkl Jherh Qqyhnsoh ,oa llqj osnizdk’k dks dh exj mUgksusa bldh rjQ dksbZ /;ku ugha fn;k rFkk mldh lkl us mls dgk fd ;s rks ,sls gh djrs jgsaxs rsjs dks jguk gS rks jg rc og ;g lc lgu djrh jghA** blh izdkj mUgksaus izn’kZ&11 i= tks iqfyl v/kh{kd fljksgh dks fnukad 09-03-2006 dks izLrqr fd;k gS] mlesa Hkh mlus ;g vafdr fd;k gS fd ^^tc ls og llqjky xbZ rc ;s gh mls ;g ns[kus dks feyk fd mlds ifr lqHkk”k dk xyr fj’rk mldh tsBkuh vydk iRuh lqjs’kdqekj ds lkFk gSA mlus tc budh v’yhy gjdrs ns[kh rks mlus fojks/k fd;kA bl ij mlds ifr us mlds lkFk ekjihV Hkh dh RkFkk mldh tsBkuh] mldh uun js[kk ftldh ‘kknh ekm.Vvkcw fuoklh y{e.k ds lkFk gqbZ gS] mls cqyk;k rFkk mldh uun] lkl&llqj bu lc us feydj mls dgk fd bl ?kj esa jguk gS rks pqipki lc lgu djds jguk gS rFkk ;g ckr ?kj ds ckgj ugha tkuh pkfg;sA mldh tsBkuh us rks mlds ifr ds fy[ks gq, izsei= Hkh mls ykdj fn;s rFkk dgk fd bl fpV~Vh;ksa dks i<+us ls rqedks ekywe gks tk;sxk fd mlds lqHkk”k ls D;k lEcU/k gSA** blh izdkj mlus izn’kZ&,6 i= iqfyl v/kh{kd ikyh dks fnukad 24-04-2006 dks fy[kk gS] mlesa Hkh mlus ;g rF; vafdr fd;k gS fd ^^tc ls og llqjky xbZ rc ls gh mls ;g ns[kus dks feyk fd mlds ifr lqHkk”k dk xyr fj’rk mldh tsBkuh vydk iRuh lqjs’kdqekj ds lkFk gSA mlus tc budh v’yhy gjdrs ns[kh rks mlus fojks/k fd;kA bl ij mlds ifr us mlds lkFk ekjihV Hkh dh rFkk mldh tsBkuh] mldh uun js[kk ftldh ‘kknh ekm.Vvkcw fuoklh y{e.k ds lkFk gqbZ gS] mls cqyk;k x;k rFkk mldh uun] tsBkuh] lkl&llqj bu lc us feydj mls dgk fd bl ?kj esa jguk gS rks pqipki lc lgu djds jguk gS rFkk ;g ckr ?kj ds ckgj ugha tkuh pkfg;sA mldh tsBkuh us rks mlds ifr ds fy[ks gq, izsei= Hkh mls ykdj fn;s rFkk dgk fd bu fpV~Vh;ksa dks i<+us ls rqedks ekywe gks tk;sxk fd mls lqHkk”k ls D;k lEcU/k gSA** blh izdkj fnukad 15-03-2007 dks tks Jherh fMEiy }kjk ?kjsyw fgalk ckcr~ izkFkZuki= izLrqr fd;k x;k gS] gS rFkk ;g ckr ?kj ds ckgj ugha tkuh pkfg;sA mldh tsBkuh us rks mlds ifr ds fy[ks gq, izsei= Hkh mls ykdj fn;s rFkk dgk fd bu fpV~Vh;ksa dks i<+us ls rqedks ekywe gks tk;sxk fd mls lqHkk”k ls D;k lEcU/k gSA** blh izdkj fnukad 15-03-2007 dks tks Jherh fMEiy }kjk ?kjsyw fgalk ckcr~ izkFkZuki= izLrqr fd;k x;k gS] mlesa Hkh mlus ;g Li”V dFku fd;k gS fd ^^mlus vius ifr dks dgk fd vki jkstkuk nsj jkf= rc vius HkkHkh ds ikl gh jgrs gS D;k ckr gS\ bl ij lqHkk”k us ifjokfnuh dks Li”V dgk fd esjh HkkHkh vkSj esjs laca/k ds ckjs esa rqEgsa T;knk lkspus dh t:jr ugha gSA bl ?kj esa jguk gS rks ;g lc lgu djuk iM+sxk ftldk Li”V vk’k; ;g Fkk fd mlds viuh HkkHkh ds lkFk voS/k lEcU/k gSA bl ij ifjokfnu us viuh lkl ls ;g ckr dgh rks ifjokfnu dh lkl o ckn esa llqj us ifjokfnu dks Li”V ;g dg fn;k fd lqHkk”k o mldh HkkHkh vydk ds vkil esa voS/k laca/k gS] ftls rqEgsa Lohdkj djuk iMs+xkA bl ij vydk us ifjokfnuh dks vius dejs ls djhc 10&12 i= ykdj] muesa ls ,d i= vydk ifjokfnu ds ikl gh NksM+ xbZA** vFkkZr~ fofHkUu LFkkuksa ij fyf[kr :i ls vizkFkhZ;k us izkFkhZ o mldh HkkHkh ds voS/k lEcU/k gksus ds vkjksi yxk;s gS vkSj bl lanHkZ esa mlus nks vk/kkj izdV fd;s gS] ,d rks mlds }kjk Lo;a mUgsa v’yhy gjdrs gq, ns[kuk vius i=ksa esa vafdr fd;k gS vkSj nwljh rjQ vydk }kjk ,sls dbZ i= mls crkdj mlesa ls izn’kZ&,3 i= mlds ikl NksM+ nsuk dfFkr fd;k x;k gSA mYys[kuh; gS fd vizkFkhZ;k dh vksj ls bl fcUnq ij tks dFku fd;s x;s gS] mlesa mlus izkFkhZ }kjk viuh HkkHkh ds lkFk v’yhy gjdrs djrs gq, ns[kk gks] ,slk dksbZ dFku ugha fd;k gS] vfirq dsoy ;g dFku fd;k x;k gS fd mlds ifr dk O;ogkj mudh HkkHkh vydk ds lkFk jgk ,oa tks i= mlus vydk HkkHkh dks fy[kk] mlls mls mlds ifr ds mldh HkkHkh ds lkFk lEcU/kksa ij ‘kadk gqbZ tks LokHkkfod gSA ftjg esa izn’kZ&,3 i= ds ckjs esa iwNs tkus ij mlus tks dFku fd;s gS mlls izdV gS fd mlus vyx&vyx LFkkuksa ij og i= fdl izdkj izkIr gqvk] bl ckcr~ fHkUu&fHkUu dFku izdV fd;s gS] ,d txg og ;g dFku djrh gS fd izn’kZ&,3 i= mls mldh tsBkuh mldh HkkHkh ds lkFk lEcU/kksa ij ‘kadk gqbZ tks LokHkkfod gSA ftjg esa izn’kZ&,3 i= ds ckjs esa iwNs tkus ij mlus tks dFku fd;s gS mlls izdV gS fd mlus vyx&vyx LFkkuksa ij og i= fdl izdkj izkIr gqvk] bl ckcr~ fHkUu&fHkUu dFku izdV fd;s gS] ,d txg og ;g dFku djrh gS fd izn’kZ&,3 i= mls mldh tsBkuh vydk us fn;k Fkk] nwljh txg og ;g dFku djrh gS fd lqHkk”k dh isUV dh tsc esa ls mlus ;g izn’kZ&,3 i= fudkyk Fkk rFkk rhljh txg og ;g dFku djrh gS fd ,d i= ?kj esa feyk FkkA vr% og i= dgkW ls o fdl :i esa feyk] ;g vizkFkhZ;k Li”V :i ls fl} ugha dj ik;h gSA oSls Hkh gekjh jk; esa izn’kZ&,3 i= dks ns[kk tkos rks mlls ,slk dksbZ rF; izdV ugha gksrk fd izkFkhZ o mldh HkkHkh ds chp v’yhy ;k voS/k lEcU/k jgs gks] HkkoukRed :i ls fy[kk x;k i= vo’; izrhr gksrk gSA izn’kZ&,3 i= izkFkhZ lqHkk”k us viuk gksus ls Li”V bUdkj fd;k gS vkSj bls fy[ks tkus ls Hkh bUdkj fd;k gS rFkk vydk us Hkh vius l’kiFk dFkuksa esa blls bUdkj djrs gq, dFku fd;k gS fd mls lqHkk”k us ,slk dksbZ i= feyk] u mls ,slk i= feyk vkSj u gh mlus vizkFkhZ;k dks ;g i= fn;k rc gekjh jk; esa izn’kZ&,3 i= okyh dgkuh Hkh izFken`”V;k fo’okl ds ;ksX; ugha gSA blds vykok vizkFkhZ;k }kjk ,slh dksbZ lk{; ugha nh xbZ gS ftlds vk/kkj ij mDr rF; ij fo’okl fd;k tk lds fd izkFkhZ ,oa mldh HkkHkh ds chp voS/k laca/k gks rc gekjh jk; esa ;g rF; izkFkhZ i{k fl} djus esa lQy jgk gS fd vizkFkhZ;k }kjk izkFkhZ o mldh HkkHkh ds voS/k lEcU/kksa dks >wBk o vk/kkjghu vkjksi yxk;k x;k ftlls mls ,oa mlds ifjokjtu dks vR;kf/kd ^^ekufld&dzwjrk** igaqph gSA vr% bl fcUnq ij izkFkhZ i{k dh vksj ls izLrqr ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; ds fu.kZ; bUnwfeJk cuke dksfondqekj xkSM o vU;] 2006 ¼1½ Mh-,u-ts- ¼jktLFkku½ 182] jkts’k MksMhoky cuke Jherh laxhrk] 2007 ¼2½ Mh-,u-ts- ¼jktLFkku½ 763] Jherh ikoZrh cuke izseflag] ¼2001½ Mh-,e-lh- 501 ,oa Jherh vfurk tSu cuke jktsUnzdqekj tSu] 2009 ¼3½ Mh-,u-ts- ¼jktLFkku½ 1665 esa izfrikfnr fl}kUrksa dks ns[krs gq, bl izdkj ds >wBs vkjksi yxkuk ^^ekufld&dzwjrk** dh Js.kh esa vkrk gS ,oa ;g rykd ds fy, i;kZIr vk/kkj gSA tgk¡ rd vU; vk{ksiksa dk iz’u gS] fo}ku vf/koDRkk vizkFkhZ;k dk rdZ gS ¼jktLFkku½ 763] Jherh ikoZrh cuke izseflag] ¼2001½ Mh-,e-lh- 501 ,oa Jherh vfurk tSu cuke jktsUnzdqekj tSu] 2009 ¼3½ Mh-,u-ts- ¼jktLFkku½ 1665 esa izfrikfnr fl}kUrksa dks ns[krs gq, bl izdkj ds >wBs vkjksi yxkuk ^^ekufld&dzwjrk** dh Js.kh esa vkrk gS ,oa ;g rykd ds fy, i;kZIr vk/kkj gSA tgk¡ rd vU; vk{ksiksa dk iz’u gS] fo}ku vf/koDRkk vizkFkhZ;k dk rdZ gS fd loZizFke rks mijksDr rF; fl} ugha gksrs vkSj ;g eku Hkh fy;k tkos rks Hkh ;g ikfjokfjd thou dh lkekU; mBk&iVd ek= gS] mlls xaHkhj ughaA gekjh jk; esa mudk ;g rdZ lkjghu gS D;ksafd izkFkhZ ij fookg ds dqN le; ckn vizkFkhZ;k us ncko Mkyuk ‘kq: fd;k fd og vizkFkhZ;k ds firk ds ;gka jgdj muds O;olk; esa lg;ksx djs vkSj ,slk ugha djus ij vizkFkhZ;k us izkFkhZ o mlds ifjokj okyksa dks xkyhxykSp] vHknz O;ogkj yEcs le; rd djuk vkSj mUgsa ngst o vU; >wBs eqdnesa esa Qalk, tkus dh /kedh vkfn nsuk vkSj mlds ckn ihgj tkdj muds fo:} QkStnkjh eqdnek ntZ djk nsuk ftlesa mudks fxjrkj gksuk iM+k] vkfn rF;ksa ls ;g ugha ekuk tk ldrk fd ;s ikfjokfjd thou dh lkekU; mBk&iVd ek= gS] vfirq gekjh jk; esa og Hkh ^^dzwjrk** dh Js.kh esa vkrk gSA tgk¡ rd fo}ku vf/koDrk vizkFkhZ;k ds bl rdZ dk iz’u gS fd fnukad 09-01-2008 dks izkFkhZ }kjk vizkFkhZ;k dh vksj ls izLrqr 125 n-iz-la- izkFkZuki= esa ;g fy[kus ds vk/kkj ij fd og vizkFkhZ;k dks lkFk j[kus ds fy, rS;kj gS] bl dzwjrk dks ekQ dj fn;k x;k gSA gekjh jk; esa ;g rdZ Hkh lkjghu gS D;ksafd dzwjrk dh ekQh ds lanHkZ esa izkFkhZ i{k dh vksj ls tks ekuuh; bykgkckn mPp U;k;ky; dk fu.kZ; Jherh vkHkk vxzoky cuke lquhy vxzoky] 2001 ¼1½ flfoy dksVZ dslst 266 is’k fd;k] mlesa fgUnw fookg vf/kfu;e ds vuqlkj dzwjrk dh ekQh dk rkRi;Z nkEiR; vf/kdkjksa ds laca/kksa esa fd;s x;s vijk/k dks Hkwy tkuk ,oa ,sls d`R; fd;s tkus okys i{kdkj dks iwoZorhZ fLFkfr esa okfil LFkkfir dj nsuk] tSlk fd og ml ?kVuk ls iwoZ esa Fkk] ekuk tk;sxk vkSj bl izdj.k esa ,slh dksbZ fLFkfr ugha vkbZ gS] dsoy izkFkhZ }kjk vizkFkhZ;k ds /kkjk 125 n-iz-la- ds izkFkZuki= esa ;g fy[k nsus ek= ls fd og vizkFkhZ;k dks vkt Hkh lkFk j[kus ds fy;s rS;kj gS] ;g ugha ekuk tk ldrk fd izkFkhZ us mldh iwoZorhZ dzwjrk dks ekQ dj fn;k gS D;ksafd mlds ckn nksuksa i{kksa ds vkSj bl izdj.k esa ,slh dksbZ fLFkfr ugha vkbZ gS] dsoy izkFkhZ }kjk vizkFkhZ;k ds /kkjk 125 n-iz-la- ds izkFkZuki= esa ;g fy[k nsus ek= ls fd og vizkFkhZ;k dks vkt Hkh lkFk j[kus ds fy;s rS;kj gS] ;g ugha ekuk tk ldrk fd izkFkhZ us mldh iwoZorhZ dzwjrk dks ekQ dj fn;k gS D;ksafd mlds ckn nksuksa i{kksa ds chp nkEiR; thou dh iquZLFkkiuk ugha gqbZ gS] dsoy ek= lkFk j[kus dk fy[kk x;k gS] vizkFkhZ;k mlds ckn izkFkhZ ds lkFk jgus xbZ gks] ,slk dksbZ izdj.k vizkFkhZ i{k dk ugha gSA vr% ;g ugha ekuk tk ldrk fd izkFkhZ us vizkFkhZ;k }kjk fd;s x;s dzwjrkiw.kZ O;ogkj dks ekQ dj fn;k gks ;k ,slk varfje Hkj.kiks”k.k ds izkFkZuki= esa fy[k nsus ek= ls og fookg&foPNsn dh dk;Zokgh ugha dj ldrk gksA 13- QyLo:i gekjh jk; esa mijksDr leLr foospu ds vk/kkj ij bl izdj.k esa izkFkhZ i{k ;g fl} djus esa lQy jgk gS fd vizkFkhZ;k }kjk izkFkhZ ds lkFk dzwjrkiw.kZ O;ogkj fd;k x;k gSA vr% ;g fook|d izkFkhZ ds i{k esa foi{kh;k ds fo:} r; fd;k tkrk gSA vkns’k 18- vr% izkFkhZ lqHkk”k iq= osnizdk’k tkfr vxzoky fuoklh lqesjiqj rglhy lqesjiqj ftyk ikyh dh vksj ls izLrqr ;kfpdk varxZr /kkjk 13 fgUnw fookg vf/kfu;e foi{kh;k Jherh fMEiy iq=h lR;ukjk;.k tkfr vxzoky fuoklh Lo:ixat rglhy fi.MokMk ftyk fljksgh ds fo:} Lohdkj dh tkdj izkFkhZ lqHkk”k ,oa foi{kh;k Jherh fMEiy ds e/; fnukad 13-05-2001 dks xkao Lo:ixat rglhy fi.MokMk ftyk fljksgh esa fgUnw jhfr fjokt vuqlkj laikfnr fookg vkt fnukad 28-07-2011 ls fo?kfVr fd;k tkrk gS bldk izHkko fMdzh ls gksxkA foi{kh;k Jherh fMEiy dh vksj izkFkhZ ds fo:} izLrqr izfr&izdj.k :ih ;kfpdk vUrxZr /kkjk 9 fgUnw fookg vf/kfu;e okLrs nkEiR; vf/kdkjksa dh iquZLFkkiuk ,r}kjk vLohdkj ;kfu [kkfjt dh tkrh gSA rnuqlkj fMdzh ipkZ cuk;k tk,A ,lMh@& ¼vt; dqekj ‘kkjnk½ ftyk U;k;k/kh’k] fljksghA** 15. It is also found relevant to reproduce the offending letter Ex.A/3, which according to the respondent-husband caused him mental agony and cruelty by appellant-wife since she produced this letter before the court below but at the same time disclosing different sources at different time about its source of finding it & as noted by the court below in the afore quoted portion, she failed to prove whether her husband had really written the said letter to his sister-in-law. “Dear -N- Dear Bhabhi ji, Hello & Sweet Memory. “Dear -N- Dear Bhabhi ji, Hello & Sweet Memory. ^^esjk fny ;s iqdkjs vktk--------A** irk ugha ysVj esa D;k&Dk fy[krs gS fQj Hkh VªkbZ djrk gwa D;ksafd vkius Hkh VªkbZ dh ,aM ;w fcde lDll eSa Hkh VªkbZ djrk gaw ‘kk;n dqN fy[k ladwA loZizFke] eSa ;gka Bhd gwa vkSj vk’kk gS vki Hkh Bhd gksxhA HkkHkhth] vki rks uojk=h ‘kq: gksus ds dqN fnu igys gh vtesj pyh xbZ blfy;s ;gka ds MkafM;k rks vki ugha ns[k ik;s ysfdu vtesj ds MkafM;k rks ns[ks gh gksaxsA dSls yxs Iyht jkbZV bfetsVyh ;gka rks cgqr vPNs yxs ij fQj Hkh ‘kk;n vPNk yxus esa dqN deh yxh D;ksafd MkafM;k ns[kus ge vkids lkFk ugh tk ldsA oSls ge dj Hkh D;k ldrs Fks vki vtesj esa tks FksA oSls vki rks vtesj esa MkafM;k ns[kus o [ksyus dk yqRQ mBk jgh gksxhA HkkHkhth] eq>s dqN yksxks ls f’kdk;r gS fd os ckj&ckj eq>ls >wB cksyrs gS fd vkius eq>s ;gh ?kj ij cqyk;k tcfd vki rks vtesj esa gks] fQj Hkh esa mudh ckrksa ij fo’okl ugha djrk D;ksafd vkius [kqn eq>s VsyhQksu ij vius vtesj tkus dks dgk Fkk vkf[kj vki eq>ls >wB FkksM+s gh cksyxhA D;ksafd vki ‘kk;n gh ,slh etkd ilUn djs tks eq>s nq[kh djsA vkils rks eqykdkr ‘kk;n rHkh gks tc vki vtesj ls okil vk;saA vtesj ls okil vkus ij eq>s t:j lwfpr djuk D;ksafd vkids fcuk dqN Hkh vPNk ugha yxrk u rks MkafM;k ns[kuk vkSj u gh f’koxat tkuk vkfnA gks ldrk gS vkidks rks esjh ;kn fcYdqy Hkh ugha vkrh D;ksafd vtesj ‘kgj gh ,slk gS ogka rks tkrk gS vius vki esa gh e’k:Q gks tkrk gS ysfdu eSa rks vkidks ,d ewesaV ds fy, Hkh ugha Hkqyk ik;k cl ;gh lksprk jgrk gaw fd ^^gels dk Hkwy gqbZ tks ;s ltk gedk feyhA** vkSj gka vkius rks vtesj tkus ds ckn u rks VsyhQksu ij ckr dh vkSj u gh ysVj fy[kkA ‘kk;n vki eq>ls fdlh ckr is ukjkt gks] ysfdu eq>s [kq’kh gS D;ksafd ukjkt Hkh rks mlh is fn[kkrs gS u ftl ij viuk dqN vf/kdkj curk gksA vkSj gka dksbZ ukjkt gks rHkh rks :Bs dks eukus dk ekSdk feyrk gSA rks crkb;s vkyk deku dks eukus ds fy;s D;k fd;k tk;s ;fn vki dgs fd ekj fn;k tk; ;k NksM+ fn;k tk;s rks eSa rks ;gh dgwaxk fd NksM+us dh xyrh rks dHkh er djuk fQj Hkh vkf[kj eq>s ;g rks dguk gh gksxk fd ^^gedk ekQh ns nksA** d`i;k eukus dk lq>ko tYnh ls crk;s rkfd esa l:ixat rks rgs fny ls vk ldaq ojuk eSa rks ysVj fy[krs i<+rs fgpfd;k gh ysrk jgrk gawA fQj Hkh l:ixat vkdj xyh ds dksus esa gh iM+rk gSA oSls vki vtesj ls dc rc okil vk,axh D;ksafd dHkh&dHkh eSa rks ;s Hkwy gh tkrk gaw fd vki vtesj esa gS o eSa rks vkidks MkafM;k LFkku ij gh <aw<rk jgrk gaw ckn esa dgh tkdj ;k vkrk gS fd vki rks ;gh dgsaxh u fd eSa rks vtesj pyh tkmaxh ihNs <aw<rs jg tkvksxsA dHkh&dHkh nhnh ds ?kj ds ckgj tkyh ij vkdj [kMk jgrk gaw rks fdlh vkSj ds vkids ckjs esa ;kn fnykus ij gh [;kyksa ls vyx gks ikrk gawA gka rks vk okil dc vkj jgh gS gks lds rks uojk=h chp gh yksV vkb;s rkfd HkVds jkgh lM+d ij vk ldsA ij pys ldsaA pfy;s vc dqN dke dh ckr ij vkr gSA HkS; vkidks cgqr ;kn djrs gS vkSj HkS;k Hkh eq>ls etkd djrs gS fd vki vtesj x;h gh ughaA vki mUgsa t:j MkfM;sxkA vki tc Hkh vtesj ls okil vk;sxh esjs fny ds lqdqu feysxk vkSj eSa ;g xkrk gqvk >we mBaxk fd ^^vkt engks’k gqvk tk;s js] esjk eu--------------A** vksg] lkjh------------ eSa rks ;g Hkwy gh x;k Fkk fd eSa rks egt ,d ysVj fy[k jgk gawA eSa rks tSls vius [;kyk dh fdrkc esa fny dh nkLrku dh ;knksa dks ,DlhysVj dh rjg nck;s gh tk jgk FkkA vkbe lks lkjhA vkxs ls /;ku j[kawxkA Nkouh esa lHkh vPNs gSA eEeh th us o js[kh nhnh us vkidks ;kn Qjek;k gS lkFk gh ;ksxs’k us HkhA eq>s rks ysVj fy[k dj ldqu feyk gS pSu rHkh feysxk tc vkils xqrxq gksxhA vc rks nks gh vtZ gS ,d rks ykSV vkbZ;A nwljh vtZ gS vknkc vtZA Qsl Vw Qsl gksus rd xqM ck;] vksds uke lc tkurs gSA** 16. Besides the aforesaid letter, it will also be appropriate to quote some portions of the statements recorded by the court below in the proceedings under Section 13 of the Act. Besides the aforesaid letter, it will also be appropriate to quote some portions of the statements recorded by the court below in the proceedings under Section 13 of the Act. (i) Statement of husband-Subhash - respondent ^^2- eSa ‘kiFkiwoZd c;ku djrk gaw fd vizkFkhZ;k dk O;ogkj fookg ds dqN le; rd esjs izfr Bhd jgk exj dqN le; i’pkr ls gh vizkFkhZ;k us eq> ij ncko Mkyuk ‘kq: dj fn;k fd vki esjs firk ds ;gka l:ixat esa muds lkFk O;olk; ‘kq: djsa rFkk l:ixat es gh fuokl djsaA esjs }kjk dbZ ckj le>kbZ’k djus ds ckotwn Hkh vizkFkhZ;k ugha ekuh rFkk vius ftn~n ij vMh jgh bl gsrq nckc c<kus ds fy, esjs lkFk ,oa esjs ifjokutu ds lkFk vizkFkhZ;k us misf{kr O;ogkdj djuk ‘kq: dj fn;kA vizkFkhZ;k fcuk fdlh mfpr otg ds esjs ifjokjtu ds lkFk >xM+k ,oa ckr ckr ij xkyh xyksp djuk ‘kq: dj fn;kA esjs }kjk dkQh le>kus ds ckotwn Hkh vizkFkhZ;k ugha ekuh rFkk vizkFkhZ;k us Li”V :i ls eq>s dg fn;k fd ;fn eSa mlds firk ds ?kj ugha jgrk gS rks vizkFkhZ;k Hkh ?kj NksM+dj pyh tk;sxh rFkk /kedh nsus yxh mldh ckr ugh ekuh rks fdlh Hkh lhek rd vkjksi yxk ldrh gSA iwjs ifjokj dks ngst ds >wBs eqdnes esa ,oa vU; eqdnesa Qalk nsxhA blds ckotwn Hkh esjs }kjk vizkFkhZ;k dks le>kus dh dksf’k’k dh ysfdu vizkFkhZ;k ugha ekuh rFkk vUr esa fnukad 22-06-2002 dks vizkFkhZ;k us vius HkkbZ dks vLirky tkus dk cgkuk cukdj cqyk;k rFkk vius ihgj l:ixat pyh x;h] ogka esjs ,oa esjs ifjokjtu ds fo:} ngst dh ekax dk >wBk eqdnek dj fn;k bl izdkj vizkFkhZ;k us esjs ,oa esjs ifjokj ds lnL;ks dh gj rjg ls ijs’kku dj esjs lkFk dzwjrk dhA 3- eSa ‘kiFk iwoZd c;ku djrk gaw fd vizkFkhZ;k vius mn~ns’; esa lQy ugha gksus ij uSfrdrk dh lkjh lhekvksa dks lekIr dj fn;k rFkk eq> ij esjh eka leku HkkHkh vydk ds lkFk voS/k lEcU/k gksus ds fcYdqy >wBk] euxa<r o vk/kkjghu vkjksi yxk fn;k rFkk vizkFkhZ;k us flQZ eq> ij gh ugha cfYd vizR;{k :i ls esjs ekrk firk ij Hkh bl voS/k lEcU/k ij vizkFkhZ;k dks pqipki lgu djus ds vkns’k nsus dk vkjksi yxk fn;k tks vkjksi fcYdqy gh vk/kkjghu gSA bl izdkj vizkFkhZ;k us esjs lkFk dzwjrk dh gSA vizkFkhZ;k us eq>s 8 o”kZ ls vf/kd ls vfHkR;Dr dj j[kk gSA 4- eSaa ‘kiFk iwoZd c;ku djrk gwa fd vizkFkhZ;k us esjs ,oa esjs ifjokj ds lnL;ks dks eq>s ngst dh ekaxuh djus dk eqdnek ntZ djok dj eq>s ,oa esjs ifjokj ds lnL;ksa dks fxjrkj djok fn;k tcfd esjs ,oa esjs ifjokjtu }kjk vizkFkhZ;k ls dHkh Hkh ngst dh ekaxuh ugha dh x;h rFkk vizkFkhZ;k }kjk izLrqr iqfyl v/kh{kd dh fjiksVZ esa Hkh ngst dh ekax dk ftdz ugha fd;k x;k gSA vizkFkhZ;k us >wBs cukoVh o euxa<r vkjksi yxkdj eq>s ,oa esjs ifjokj ds lnL;ksa ds fo:} ?kjsyw fgalk ls L=h dk laj{k.k vf/kfu;e o Hkj.k iks”k.k ds >qBs eqdnes dj esjs lkFk dzwjrk dh gSA ftjg ;g ckr lgh gS fd eSus vius iq= ds tUefnu ij dksbZ fxV ugha HkstkA ;g ckr lgh gS fd esjk iq= vkcwjksM+ Ldwy esa i<rk Fkk ogka eSa dHkh ugha x;kA esjs cM+s HkkbZ lqjs’k dk fookg dkSulh rkjh[k dks gqvk og rkjh[k eq>s ;kn ugha gS ysfdu djhc iUnzg ls chl lky fookg gq, gks x;s gSA ;g ckr lgh gS fd esjs cM+s HkkbZ lqjs’k ds vHkh rd dksbZ larku iSnk ugha gqbZ gSA ;g dguk gS fd esjs iq= dks gekjs ?kj esa cCcw uke ls cqykrs gksA esjs iq= dk bZykt fnukad 9-5-03 dks egkohj vLirky esa gqvk gks rks eq>s irk ughA esjs pkpk ds yM+ds dk uke ;ksxs’k gSA ;g dguk xyr gS fd fnukad 21-06-2002 dks vizkFkhZ;k dksbZ bykt gsrq ;ksxs’k ljdkjh vLirky ysdj x;k gks cfYd ;ksxs’k ugha x;k eSa x;k FkkA izn’kZ&,2 iphZ eSusa rS;kj djkbZ Fkh ;k ugha ;g eq>s irk ughaA vt[kqn dgk fd izn’kZ &,2 iphZ Fkh ;k nwljh Fkh ;g irk ugha] esjh iRuh xHkZorh Fkh blfy, mldk VsLV djokus gsrq eSa ysdj x;k FkkA ;g dguk xyr gS fd fnukad 21-06-02 dks esjh iRuh xHkZorh ugha gksA fQj dgk fd eSa fnukad 21-06-01 dh ckr le> jgk gwa] fnukad 21-06-02 dks rks eSa vizkFkhZ;k dks tujy pSdvi djokus ds fy, ysdj x;k FkkA ;g ckr lgh gS fd esjh HkkHkh dk uke vydk gSA ;g eq>s irk ugha gS fd esjh HkkHkh vydk ds cM+h cgu dh ‘kknh vtesj esa gqbZ ;k ughaA izn’kZ&,3 i= dh fy[kkoV esjs gkFk dh ugha gS] mDr i= eSusa ugha fy[kk gSA esjh cgu dk uke js[kk gSA izn’kZ&,3 i= gekjs ifjokj ds fdlh Hkh lnL; ds gkFk dk fy[kk gqvk ugha gSA ge nks HkkbZ] eSa o lqjs’kA ;g dguk xyr gS fd izn’kZ&,3 i= esjh HkkHkh vydk us fMEiy dks fn;k gksA l:ixat o lqesjiqj esa dc&dc le>kb’k gqbZ bldh rkjh[k eq>s ;kn ugha gS ysfdu geus dbZ ckj iz;kl fd;s fd fMEiy vk tk,A gekjh le>kb’k esa esjs pkpk egsUnzth] QqQkth izHkqn;kyth] nwljs pkpk ckcwykyth Fks tks vyx&vyx le>kb’kksa esa vyx&vyx fj’rsnkj ‘kkfey FksA ;g ckr lgh gS fd le>kb’k foQy gksus ij eSus vizkFkhZ;k dks ykus gsrq dksbZ uksfVl ugha fn;kA vt[kqn dgk fd esjs firkth us i= t:j fy[ks FksA iqfyl v/kh{kd ikyh o iqfyl v/kh{kd fljksgh ds le{k okrkZyk esa ngst dh ckr ugha gqbZ D;ksfd geus dHkh Hkh ngst dh ekax vizkFkhj;k ls ugha dhA ngst ds eqdnes esa esjs fo:) dkSu&dkSu xokg gS bldk eSus /;ku ugha fn;k D;ksafd lHkh xokg >waBs gSA ;g dguk xyr gS fd esjs o esjh HkkHkh ds e/; dksbz voS/k lEca/k gksA tc fMEiy us esjs o esjh HkkHkh dks ysdj >wBs vkjksi yxk, mu >wBs vkjksi yxk, mu >waBs vkjksiks dh tkudkjh eq>s eqdnek djus ij gqbZ vkSj mlds igys Hkh eqDtqckuh vkjksi yxkus ls gqbZ FkhA lqesjiqj o l:ixat esa geus lekt bdëk fd;k FkkA lekt bdëk fd;k mlesa dksbZ fy[kk i<+h ugha gqbZA lekt bdëk fd;k rc mlds firkth ekStwn jgrs FksA lekt bdëk fookg&foPNsn dh dk;Zokgh ds igys fd;k FkkA vc fMEiy esjs lkFk jguk pkgs rks laHko ugh gS D;ksafd eq>s tsy esa Myok;k] esjs Åij >awBs ykaNu yxk,] gesa dyfdar fad;kA ;g ckr lgh gS fd /kkjk 120 na-iz-la- dh dk;Zokgh foi{kh;k }kjk fd;s tkus ij mldk tokc fn;s tkus ds djhc lkr ekg ckn eSusa ;g rykd dk eqdnek is’k fd;k gSA ;g dguk xyr gS fd bl lkr ekg dh vof/k esa geus foi{kh;k dks ykus dk dksbZ iz;kl ugha fd;k gks vfirq feyus&tqyus okyks ls dgk Fkk fd vHkh dksbZ jkLrk fudyrk gks rks fudkyks ysfdu ugha vkus ij ;g rykd dk eqdnek is’k fd;kA fMEiy ds nks HkkbZ gSA ;g eq>s irk ugha gS fd fMEiy ds firkth o nks HkkbZ ,d nqdku ij cSBdj lkFk esa O;olk; djrs gksA fMEiy us eq>s ‘kknh gksrs gh nl&iUnzg fnu ckn ;g dguk ‘kq: dj fn;k fd l:ixat pyksa vkSj ogka tkdj O;olk; djks rFkk l:ixat esa gh jgksA eSa O;oLkk; gsrq l:ixat dHkh ugh x;kA ;g dguk xyr gS fd fnaukd 21-6-02 dks gekjs e/; dksbZ fookn ugha gks vfirq fMEiy us vucu ‘kq: dj nh FkhA fMEiy us iwjs ifjokj ds lkFk gh xkyhxykSp o Øwjrk djuk ‘kq: dj fn;k Fkk bl dkj.k ifjokj ds LkHkh lnL; tkurs Fks] eq>s fdlh dks crkus dh vko’;drk ugha FkhA fnukad 21-06-02 rd fMEiy dbZ ckj vius ihgj tk pqdh Fkh vkSj dbZ ckj geus le>k&cq>kdj mldks yk;k FkkA ;g dguk xyr gS fd esjs HkkHkh ds dksbZ larku ugh gksus ds dkj.k geus fMEiy ij ncko Mkyk gks fd rq Hkh fM,Ulh djkA ;g dguk xyr gS fd fMEiy viuk cPpk cpkus ds fy, ihgj vius HkkbZ ds lkFk x;h gksA cPps ds tUe ds ckn fMEiy gekjs ?kj ij vk;h Fkh tks vius vki ugha vk;h] ge mls ysdj vk;s FksA vt[kqn dgk fd bl lksp ds lkFk fd vc iq= gks x;k gS ftlls mlds O;ogkj esa ifjorZu gks x;k gksxk vkSj ?kj ugh VwVsA tc esjs i= gqvk ml le; eSa phu ugh x;k FkkA ;g dguk xyr gS fd fnukad 22-06-2002 ds ckn fMEiy vius ihgj l:ixat x;h mldh ckn ge mls ysus dHkh l:ixat ugha x;s gksA ;g dguk xyr gS fd fMEiy ds ifjokj us lqesjiqj esa lekt bdëk fd;k gksA eSa lqejs iqj ds xksikyth] ckcwth] vafcdk lsusVªh okys lR;ukjk;.kth dks igpkurk gwaA ;g dguk xyr gS fd mDr rhuksa O;fDr fMEiy ds firkth ds lkFK gekjs ?kj vk;s gksA ;g dguk xyr gS fd fMEiy dks gejs igus diM+s ?kj ls ekjihV dj fudky fn;k gksa bl dkj.k og vius ihgj esa jg jgh gksA vt[kqn dgk fd fMEiy dk HkkbZ gekjs ?kj vk;k vkSj fMEIky dejs ls mldk lkjk lkeku iSdj gksLihVy ds cgkus HkkbZ ds lkFk pyh x;hA ;g ckr lgh gS fd fMEiy gekjs ?kj ls mldk lkjk lkeku ysdj x;h mldh geus iqfyl dk;Zokgh ugha fd ysfdu le>kus dk iz;kl t:j fd;k FkkA eSus cPps ls feyus dh dksf’k’k dhA ;g ckr lgh gS fd eSus cPps dks izkIr djus ds fy, dksbZ dkuwuh dk;Zokgh ugha dhA esjs vady dk llqjky l:ixat es gSA esjs vady ds llqjth dk uke eq>s irk ugha gSA ;g ckr lgh gS fd fMEiy dh cgu lqesjiqj esa jgrh gSA izn’kZ&9 o izn’kZ&10 ds tfj;s geus fMEiy dks lkeku lqiqnZ fd;k FkkA ;g dguk xyr gS fd fMEiy ds xHkZorh gksus ij eSus fM,Ulh djkus ds fy, ml ij ncko Mkyk gks rFkk bl ij mlus vius HkkbZ dks i= fy[kk gksA ;g dguk xyr gS fd eSa fMEiy dk g”kZ dks ugh j[krk gks bl dkj.k og vius ihgj esa fuokl dj jgh gksA ;g dgrk xyr gS fd esjs o esjs ifjokj ds cs:[ksiu ls fMEiy vius ihgj jg jgh gksA ;g dguk xyr gS fd fMEiy vius ihgj jg jgh gksA ;g dguk xtr gS fd fMEiy us gekjs fo:) tks Hkh dk;Zokgh dh gS mlls ges dksbZ ekufld o ‘kkfjfjd ijs’kkuh ugha gqbZ gksA ;g dguk xyr gS fd eSus o esjs ifjokjtu us fMEiy o mlds ifjokjokyksa ls ngst esa iUnzg yk[k :i;s dh ekax dh gksA eS] esjs ekrk&firk] esjs lxs HkkbZ oxSjg lHkh ‘kkfey gh jgrs gSA ;g dguk xyr gS fd esjs lkFk fMEiy us dHkh dksbZ Øwjrk ugh dks gksA ;g dguk xyr gS fd fMEiy esjs ls iquZLFkkiuk dh fMØh izkIr djus dh vf/kdkfj.kh gksA** (ii) Statement of Suresh (Elder brother of Subhash) 2- eS ‘kiFk iwoZd c;ku djrk gwa fd vizkFkhZ;k vius mnns’; esa lQy ugh gksus ij usfrdrk dh lkjh lhekvks dks lekIr dj fn;k rFkk lqHkk”k ij mldh ekW leku HkkHkh vydk tks fd esjs /keZiRuh gS fd lkFk voS/k lEca/k gksus dk fcYdqy >qaBk] euxa<+r o vk/kkjghu vkjksi yxk fn;kA vizkFkhZ;k us flQZ lqHkk”k o esjs iRuh vydk ij gh ugha cfYd vizR;{k :i ls esjs ekrk firk ij Hkh bl voS/k lEca/k ij vizkFkhZ;k dks pqipki lgu djus ds vkns’k nsus dk vkjksi yxk fn;k tks vkjksi fCkYdqy gh vk/kkjghu gSA bl izdkj vizkFkhZ;k us gekjs lkFk Øqjrk dh gS ,oa esjh iRuh vydk o lqHkk”k dks cnuke fd;k gSA vizkFkh;k us lqHkk”k dks 8 o”kZ ls vf/kd ls vfHkO;DRk dj j[kk gSA ftjg eq>s ;g tkudkjh ugha gS fd lqHkk”k us esjh iRuh dks ,d i= fy[kk gksA ;g dguk xtr gS fd esjh iRuh vtesj esa gks rc esjs HkkbZ lqHkk”k us i= fy[kk gksA bl izdj.k esa tks ;g i= is’k gqvk gS og eSusa ugha ns[kk gSA og i= eSusa ugha ns[kk ysfdu ,QvkbZvkj esa mDr i= dks fy[kk gksus ls eSusa esjs ‘kiFki= esa c;ku fn;k gSA ml dsl esa iqfyl us esjs c;ku ugh fy;sA ;g dguk xyr gS fd lqHkk”k ds cPps dks ns[kus l:ixat eS o esjh iRuh ugha x;s gksA tc fMEIky vius HkkbZ ds lkFk esa >aB cksydj pyh xbZ Fkh mlds ckn esa eS o esjs firkth ysus ds fy, fMEiy ds ?kj l:ixat x;s FksA mldh rkjh[k eq>s vkt ;kn ugha gSA fMEiy ds tkus ds ckn eS ,d ckj gh l:ixat x;k FkkA tc ge l:ixat le>kb’k ds fy, x;s Fks rc fMEiy ds vkus ds fy, bUdkj fd;k FkkA^^ (iii) Statement of Ms. Alka (sister-in-law of Subhash) ^^2- eS ‘kiFk iwoZd c;ku djrh gwaA fd vizkFkhZ;k us uSfrdrk dh lkjh lhekvks dks ikj dj fn;k rFkk esjk lqHkk”k dk esjs lkFk voS| lEcU/k gksus dk fcYdqy >waBk o eux<+r vkjksi yxk fn;kA vizkFkhZ;k us mDr d`R; dj eq>s o lqHkk”k dks cnuke fd;k gS o Øwjrk dh gSA vizkFkhZ;k us >waBs i= lqHkk”k ds uke ls dh gSA vizkFkhZ;k us >waBs i= lqHkk”k ds uke ls cuokdj U;k;ky; es is’k fd;s gSA lqHkk”k us dHkh Hkh eq>s dksbZ i= ugh fy[kk gS rFkk u gh dksbZ i= fn;k gSA eSus dksbZ Hkh i= ,oa vizkFkhZ;k }kjk U;k;ky; esa izLrqr i= vizkFkhZ;k dks ugh fn;k gSA vizkFkhZ;k }kjk loZFkk >waBk cukoVh i= U;k;ky; esa is’k fd;s gS vkSj eq>s cnuke fd;k gSA ftjg ;g dguk xyr gS fd EkS tc vtesj viuh cgu ds ;gka x;h rc mDr i= lqHkk”k us e>s fy[kk gksA fMEiy }kjk dsl djus ds ckn esa gekjs lkeykrh ckr dks ysdj fookn gvk FkkA lqHkk”k dk dsl djus ds ckn fookn gqvk FkkA eq>s ekywe ugh gS fd dkSu ls dsl ds ckn gekjs fookn gqvk Fkk ;g ckr lgh gS fd lqHkk”k ds cPpk gksus ds ckn eSa dHkh l:ixat ugh x;hA esjs ifjokj okys fMEiy dks ysus t:j x;s Fks ysfdu fdl&fdl rkjh[k dks x;s Fks ;g eq>s vkt ;kn ugha gSA^^ (iv) State of Smt. Dimple (present appellant) ^^eS dHkh Hkh esjs ifr ;k muds ifjokj ls >xM+k ugha fd;k ,oa u gh muds lkFk misf{kr O;ogkj fd;k gSA esjs ifr }kjk eq>s le>kus ,oa esjs }kjk ?kj NksM+dj pys tkus dh ckr xyr gSA eSus ,slk dHkh ugha dgk gS oju~ lgh ckr ;g gS fd esjs xHkZorh gksus ds ckn xHkZ fxjkus dk ncko esjs ifr o mlds ifjokjtu us eq> ij Mkyk gS ijUrq eSa xHkZ fxjkus ds fy;s rS;kj ugha FkhA esjs iq= dk tUe esjs ihgj esa gqvk gS ,oa blds I’pkr eSa llqjky vkbZ ,oa jgh gwaA bl nkSjku ;k vkSj dHkh Hkh eSUks] izkFkhZ o mlds ifjokjtu ij vkjksi yxkus] ngst ds >wBs eqdnes djus o vU; eqdneksa es Qalkus dh ckr ugh dgh gSaA izkFkhZ us fookg foPNsn ;kfpdk esa loZFkk xyr :Ik ls lQy gksus ds fy;s eux<+ar o feF;k vkjksi eq> ij yxk;s gSA esjs ifr o mlds ifjokjtu us iUnzg yk[k :i;s ngst esa ykus gsrq eq> ij ncko Mkyk Fkk rc eSus ,slk djus ls euk fd;k] bl dkj.k izkFkhZ o mlds ifjokj okys eq> ij ukjkt jgus yxsA eSusa chekj gksus ij fnuakd 21-6-2002 dks esjs lkl llqj ls vLirky ys tkus ,oa bZykt djkus gsrq fuosnu fd;k Fkk ijUrq muesa ls dksbZ Hkh eq>s vLirky lkFk esa ysdj ugh x;kA esjs dkdh;k llqj ds iq= fcêw ds lkFk esa jktdh; vLirky lqesjiqj xbZ tgka eq>s MkWDVj us bZykt o tkap vkfn djkus ds fy;s ijke’kZ o funsZ’k fn;a ,oa mudk mYys[k jktdh; fpfdRlky; dh fpëh ij fd;kA 4- EkSa ‘kiFk ysrh gwa vkSj c;ku djrh gwa fd esjs ifr dk O;ogkj mudh HkkHkh vYdk ds lkFk jgk ,oa tks i= mlus vYdk HkkHkh dks fy[kk] mlls eq>s esjs ifr ds mldh HkkHkh ds lkFk lEcU/kks ij ‘kadk gqbZ gS tks LokHkkfod gSA ftjg izn’kZ ,&3 i= vnkyr esa is’k djus ls iwoZ esjs ikl gh jgkA eSus ;kfpdk ds tokc o dkm.Vj Dyse esa ;g ckr fy[kkbZ Fkh fd izn’kZ ,&3 i= eq>s esjh tsBkuh vydk us eq>s fn;k FkkA ;kfpdk ds tokc o dkm.Vj Dyse ij esjs gLrk{kj gSA Tkokc ij eSus i<+dj gLrk{kj fd;s FksA tokc ns[kdj xokg us dgk fd vydk }kjk eq>s i= nsus dh ckr fy[kh gqbZ ugha gS ysfdu i= dk fooj.k gSA eq>s vkt ;kn ugha fd eSus /kkjk 498,] 406 Hkknl ds eqdnesa es vydk }kjk i= eq>s nsuk fy[kk;k ;k ughaA lqHkk”k ds isUV dh tsc esa i= eSus fudkyk Fkk tks izn’kZ ,&3 gh FkkA vt[kqn dgk fd mDr i= eq>s HkkHkh vydk us fn;s FksA xokg us izn’kZ&3 ns[kdj dgk fd blds in la[;k ukS esa vydk HkkHkh }kjk lqHkk”k dk i= nsus dh ckr fy[kus ls jg xbZ gSA izn’kZ&3 esa izn’kZ ,&3 i= ekSdk feyus ij lqHkk”k dh isUV dh tsc ls fudkyk fy[kk gqvk gSA izn’kZ&4 iqfyl c;ku dk , ls ch Hkkx ^^,d i= ?kj esa feyk^^ lqudj dgk fd xyr fy[kk gS] eSus ,slk c;ku iqfyl dks ugha fn;kA ;kfpdk ds tokc o izn’kZ&3 ifjokn esa vydk }kjk i= fn;k tks eSus lqHkk”k dks fn;k vkSj okfil lqHkk”k dh isUV esa ls fudkyk ;g ckr fy[kh gqbZ ugha gSA vt[kqn dgk fd ?kjsyw fgalk okys eqdnesa esa mDr ckr fy[kkbZ FkhA ;g ckr lgh gS fd izn’kZ&12 Eks ekSdk feyus ij eSus lqHkk”k dh isUV esa ls fudkyk ;g rF; fy[kk gqvk ugh gSA izn’kZ&11 o izn’kZ ,&6 esa Hkh lqHkk”k dks og i= nsuk rFkk ekSdk feyus ij mldh tsc ls fudkyus okyh ckr fy[kh gqbZ ugha gS D;ksafd eSa llqjky tkuk pkgrh Fkh blfy, dqN ckrksa dk mYys[k ugh fd;kA ;g lgh gS fd eSusa tokc ;kfpdk o dkm.Vj Dyse esa 1]81]000@& :i;s Qsjs ds oDr esjs llqjkyokyks }kjk ekaxus dh ckr ugh fy[kkbZ gSA D;ksafd lqHkk”k us viuh ;kfpdk esa bldk mYys[k ugha fd;k bl dkj.k eSusa mDr ckr ugha fy[kkbZA^^ (v) Statement of Satyanarain (Father of present appellant Dimple) 3- eS ‘kiFk ysrk gwa vkSj c;ku djrk gwa fd fMEiy ‘kknh ds dqN le; i’pkr xHkZorh gqbZ rks mlds llqjky okys ukjkt gq, ,oa fMEiy ij xHkZikr djokus dk ncko Mkyus yxs] fMEiy us dkQh euk fd;k ysfdu mlds llqjky okys ugha ekus vkSj mUgksusa dgk fd tc rd vydk ds lrkau ugh gksrh rc rd rqEgkjs larku ugh pkfg,A fQj fMEiy ds lkFk misf{kr O;ogkj djus yx x;s] esjk iq= egkohjizlkn fMEiy dh ‘kknh ds 6&7 ekg ckn fMEiy ls feyus lqesjiqj x;k rks fMEiy us Mh-,e-lh- okyk i= izn’kZ ,&5 fy[kdj esjs iq= egkohjizlkn ds lkFk eq>s fHktok;k rc eSa] esjs fj’rsnkjks ds lkFk lqesjiqj x;k vkSj fMEiy ds lkl llqj o lqHkk”k dks dkQh le>k;k fd og fMEiy ij xHkZikr dk ncko ugh Mkys ysfdu muds O;ogkj esa dksbZ ifjorZu ugh vk;k rc eSa fMEiy dks ysdj l:ixat vk;k ,oa l:ixat esa gh fMEiy ds fMysojh djokbZA ftjg ;g dguk xyr gS fd /kkjk 498, ds eqdnes esa iqfyl us izn’kZ ,&3 vly i= tkap gsqr ekaxk gks vkSj geus dgk gks fd og vly i= ugha fey jgk gSA tokc ;kfpdk rS;kj djokus ds fy, eSa fMEiy ds lkFk esa vk;k Fkk ml le; odhy lkgc dks izn’kZ ,&3 i= crk;k ;k ugh ;g eq>s irk ugha] fMEiy dks irk gSA ;g eq>s irk ugha gS fd tokc ;kfpdk rS;kj djokus ds fy, ge vk;s rc izn’kZ ,&3 i= l:ixat ds lkFk ysdj vk;s Fks ;k ughA fMEiy lHkh dkxt tokc ;kfpdk rS;kj djokus vk;s rc lkFk ysdj vk;h Fkh vkSj odhy lkgc dks crk;s FksA ml le; i= izn’kZ ,&3 vly crk;k ;k ugha ;g eq>s irk ughaA ;g dguk xyr gS fd izn’kZ ,&3 i= eq>s egkohjizlkn us fMEiy dh ‘kknh ds ckn ugh fn;k gks vkSj dsoy ek= bl eqdnes ds fy, o vU; QkStnkjh eqdneks ds fy, geus >waBk rS;kj fd;k gksA izn’kZ ,&3 i= tc esjs ikl vk;k vkSj eS Okgka ij x;k rc esjh iq=h fMEiy xHkZorh FkhA blds djhc lk<+s Ng lky efgus ckn egkohj izlkn nqckjk lqesjiqj x;k rc izn’kZ ,&5 i= ysdj vk;k FkkA izn’kZ ,&5 i= egkohjizlkn ysdj vk;k rc ge mlh fnu lqesjiqj x;s Fks vkSj muls ckr dh RkFkk mlh fnu eS esjh cPph dks l:ixat ysdj vk;k Fkk ,oa mlds ckn fMysojh gqbZ FkhA^^ 17. From the totality of facts and circumstances narrated above including the statements of various parties, this Court finds that the findings recorded by the learned court below on the ground of mental cruelty committed by the appellant wife are sustainable and justifiable findings and they do not deserve any reversal by this court. As already stated above, mental cruelty committed by the either party to the matrimonial dispute cannot be measured in mathematical terms and cannot be quantified, therefore, it depends upon numerous factors like nature of allegations, the timing thereof, effect and publicity thereof etc, which can cause disturbance to the mental tranquility of either party to the matrimonial dispute. 18. It is true that filing of criminal cases against the husband and his family members was a legal right of the appellant-Dimple but it is equally true that the arrest and judicial custody of the accused persons, namely all the family members of the husband, is a great loss of reputation in the society and even if the acquittal by the competent court after the prolonged trial, the loss of reputation and harassment in the meanwhile is generally irreparable. This court is conscious of various judgments in which this Court as well as Apex Court have held that Section 498-A and 406 IPC cases have become a tool of harassment in the hands of females and they ultimately turn out to be a sheer abuse of the process of law causing trail of mental harassment and loss of time, money and career and even life sometimes by launch of such cases. That is why, the Parliament is now considering the amendment in this law in the light of various judgments and making it a compoundable and bailable offence. Secondly, in this case, letter Ex.A/3 purportedly written by the husband, which is reproduced above, in the opinion of this court, does not indicate any illicit relationship or sexual advances made by the respondent husband towards his sister-in-law, Ms. Alka but presenting the said letter by the appellant wife to all other members of the family as if it was a “love letter” written by respondent husband to his sister-in-law and then making it public and known to outside world definitely resulted in a mental harassment, agony and even cruelty to the respondent husband. Alka but presenting the said letter by the appellant wife to all other members of the family as if it was a “love letter” written by respondent husband to his sister-in-law and then making it public and known to outside world definitely resulted in a mental harassment, agony and even cruelty to the respondent husband. If a man is of character and has not done anything illicit of this nature but it is so projected to the outside world, he can neither sufficiently explain this nor can suffer illfamy, which is thrown at him. Since no water tight compartment can be drawn in such cases as to what would cause and amount to cruelty and what would not, therefore, it is always compendium of facts which has to be taken into consideration and on the weighment of such evidence in the realm of preponderance of probability & the court has to either grant divorce decree under Section 13 of the Act or refuse the same. 19. The court below granted the divorce decree not on the ground of desertion but on the ground of mental cruelty taking into account the agony and cruelty caused by the appellant wife to her husband on account of such letter, which was never proved by her to be actually written by him. Though burden was obviously on her but the impact of this was definitely the mental cruelty caused to the husband, which he could establish as a ground of seeking divorce. This was besides great harassment & loss of reputation by filing of cases under Domestic Violence Act & under Sections 498A and 406 IPC, the other behavioral problems apart. 20. This Court also cannot lose sight of the fact that the marriage has irretrievably broken down by now as the parties are living separately since 2002 and for last 14 years, they have not been able to patch-up and from the mediation proceedings by the trained mediator and even by this Court, it appears to this Court that the reconciliation and restoration of matrimonial home of the parties is not possible under any circumstances. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to allow the present appeal of the appellant-wife-Dimple but on the basis of material brought before the court below, the divorce decree granted by the learned District Judge, Sirohi deserves to be upheld. 21. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to allow the present appeal of the appellant-wife-Dimple but on the basis of material brought before the court below, the divorce decree granted by the learned District Judge, Sirohi deserves to be upheld. 21. In view of the above, the present appeal of the appellant-wife is liable to be dismissed and same is accordingly dismissed. No orders as to costs. 22. Now Coming to the award of permanent alimony to be paid by the respondent-husband to the appellant-wife for herself & her son Harsh, this Court considers it appropriate to award a sum of Rs.20 lacs (Rupees Twenty lacs only) to be paid by the respondent husband, Subhash to the appellant-wife, Dimple for her own maintenance and for the maintenance of their son Harsh, born out of the said wedlock. The said amount of Rs.20 lacs shall be paid within a period of three months from today by way of two separate FDRs of Rs.10 lacs each, one in the joint name of appellant-wife, Dimple and son, Harsh and another FDR in the first name of Harsh and appellant-wife, Dimple. The said FDRs will be for a period of five years and by that time son (Harsh) will attain majority in 2020 since he was born on 22/2/2002. The maturity value of these FDRs will be paid by cheques in the name of first holder of the FDR. The original FDRs will be handed over to the appellant and photocopy of the same may be filed along with the compliance report by the respondent husband in this Court within three months. Upon giving the said FDRs, the payment of monthly maintenance presently being paid to the appellant will stop and the appellant and her son may withdraw the interest of the aforesaid FDRs from the bank and spend the same for their own maintenance. 23. With the aforesaid directions, the present appeal is dismissed. No costs. Copy of this order be sent to the parties concerned forthwith.