Research › Search › Judgment

Gujarat High Court · body

2016 DIGILAW 1913 (GUJ)

Kishanbhai Atmaram Koli Patel v. State of Gujarat

2016-09-02

P.P.BHATT

body2016
ORDER : P.P BHATT, J. The present application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 by the applicant for regular bail in connection with First Information Report being C.R No. I-27/2016 registered with Sanand Police Station, District Ahmedabad Rural, for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 427, 34 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 135 of the Gujarat Police Act. 2. Heard learned advocate for the applicant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent-State. 3. Learned advocate for the applicant submits that the applicant is an innocent person, however he has been falsely implicated in the alleged offences punishable under Sections 302, 427, 34 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 135 of the Gujarat Police Act. It is submitted that from the charge-sheet papers there is no specific role attributed to the applicant and only on the basis of statement of co-accused and recovery of Rickshaw, the applicant has been implicated in the alleged offence. It is further submitted that there is no recovery of weapon from the applicant. It is further submitted that the applicant is having roots in District Ahmedabad and also having responsibility towards his family, therefore, there is no likelihood to run away from the trial and his presence can be secured at the of trial by imposing suitable conditions. Moreover, the investigation is over and charge-sheet is filed, therefore, there is no possibility of tampering with the evidence. Therefore, considering the nature of allegations and gravity of the offence, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions. 4. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondent-State has opposed the application for grant of regular bail looking to the nature and gravity of the offence. He has further submitted that there is a prima facie case against the present applicant. Therefore, the present application may be rejected. 5. Regard being had to the above submissions, in the facts and circumstances of the case, considering the nature of accusation made against the applicant in the First Information Report and other charge-sheet papers, this Court is of the opinion that discretion is required to be exercised in favour of the applicant for grant of bail, as now there is no possibility of tampering with the evidence as charge-sheet is filed. Hence, the present application is allowed and the applicant is ordered to be released on regular bail in connection with the FIR being C.R No. I-27/2016 registered with Sanand Police Station, District Ahmedabad Rural, on his executing a personal bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court, and subject to the following conditions, that the applicant shall; (a) not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty; (b) not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution; (c) surrender passport, if any, to the lower court within a week; (d) not leave the State of Gujarat without prior permission of the Sessions Judge concerned; (e) mark presence before the concerned Police Station on every Monday of each English calendar month for a period of three months and thereafter, alternate Monday for a period of six months, between 11:00 a.m and 2:00 p.m; (f) furnish latest and permanent address of residence to the Investigating Officer, and also to the Court at the time of execution of the bond, and shall not change the residence without prior permission of this Court. 6. The authorities will release the applicant only if he is not required in connection with any other offence for the time being. If breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions Judge concerned will be free to issue warrant or take appropriate action in the matter. Bail bond to be executed before the learned Lower Court having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above conditions, in accordance with law. At the trial, learned trial court shall not be influenced by the observations of preliminary nature, qua the evidence at this stage made by this Court while enlarging the applicant on bail. 7. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is permitted.