JUDGMENT : Daya Chaudhary, J. Learned counsel for the petitioners, at the very outset, submits that the case of the present petitioners is squarely covered by decision in CWP No.8162 of 2015 titled as Harjit Singh and others vs. State of Punjab and others, decided on 12.05.2015, CWP No.12023 of 2015 titled as Bharti Gupta and others vs. State of Punjab and others, decided on 29.05.2015 as well as CWP No.19946 of 2015 titled as Munish Kumar and others vs. State of Punjab and others, decided on 19.09.2015. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the said petitions have been disposed of by this Court with a direction to consider the case of the petitioners and they have been granted the benefits. 3. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners and without issuing notice to the other side, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondents No.5 to 8 to consider and decide the claim of the petitioners as made out in the representation in view of orders passed in cases of similarly situated employees, in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 4. In case, the petitioners are found to be entitled for the relief claimed in the petition and in the representation, the same be granted to them within a period of three months thereafter. 5. However, in case, the petitioners are still aggrieved in any manner, they are at liberty to avail the appropriate remedy. 6. The petition is disposed of accordingly.