Vijendra @ Bodo Rajusing Shikligar v. State of Gujarat
2016-09-06
P.P.BHATT
body2016
DigiLaw.ai
ORDER : P.P. BHATT, J. The present application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 by the applicant for regular bail in connection with First Information Report being C.R No. I-47/2016 registered with Godhra ‘A’ Division Police Station, District Panchmahal, for the offences punishable under Sections 454, 457, 380 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code. 2. Heard learned advocate for the applicant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent-State. 3. Learned advocate for the applicant submits that the present applicant is not named in the FIR, but subsequently by transfer warrant he has been falsely implicated in the alleged offences. It is further submitted that though the applicant is having few criminal antecedents, but in all the offences he has been enlarged on bail. It is further submitted that the applicant is resident of Vadodara City, and having responsibility towards his family, therefore, there is no likelihood to run away from the trial and his presence can be secured at the time of trial by imposing suitable conditions. It is further submitted that the investigation is over and charge-sheet is filed, therefore, there is no possibility of tampering with the evidence. Therefore, looking the nature of allegations and gravity of offence, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions. 4. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondent-State has opposed the application for grant of regular bail looking to the nature and gravity of the offence. He has further submitted that there is a prima facie case against the present applicant. Therefore, the present application may be rejected. 5. Regard being had to the above submissions, in the facts and circumstances of the case, considering the nature and gravity of accusation made against the applicant in the First Information Report and other charge-sheet papers, this Court is of the opinion that discretion is required to be exercised in favour of the applicant for grant of bail as now there is no possibility of tampering with the evidence as charge-sheet is filed. Hence, the present application is allowed and the applicant is ordered to be released on regular bail in connection with the FIR being Godhra ‘A’ Division Police Station, District Panchmahal, on his executing a personal bond of Rs.
Hence, the present application is allowed and the applicant is ordered to be released on regular bail in connection with the FIR being Godhra ‘A’ Division Police Station, District Panchmahal, on his executing a personal bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court, and subject to the following conditions, that the applicant shall; (a) not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty; (b) not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution; (c) surrender passport, if any, to the lower court within a week; (d) not leave the State of Gujarat without prior permission of the Sessions Judge concerned; (e) mark presence before the concerned Police Station on every Monday of each English calendar month for a period of three months and thereafter, alternate Monday for a period of six months, between 11:00 a.m and 2:00 p.m; (f) furnish latest and permanent address of residence to the Investigating Officer, and also to the Court at the time of execution of the bond, and shall not change the residence without prior permission of this Court; 6. The authorities will release the applicant only if he is not required in connection with any other offence for the time being. If breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions Judge concerned will be free to issue warrant or take appropriate action in the matter. Bail bond to be executed before the learned Lower Court having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above conditions, in accordance with law. At the trial, learned trial court shall not be influenced by the observations of preliminary nature, qua the evidence at this stage made by this Court while enlarging the applicant on bail. 7. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is permitted.