Research › Search › Judgment

Punjab High Court · body

2016 DIGILAW 2092 (PNJ)

Ranjit Singh v. Financial Commissioner (Excise and Taxation) Department of Excise and Taxation

2016-08-12

DAYA CHAUDHARY

body2016
JUDGMENT : DAYA CHAUDHARY, J. 1. This petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to grant the benefits of “Assured Career Progression Scheme” admissible on completion of four years, nine years and fourteen years of service on the post of Taxation Inspector, after counting ad hoc service rendered by the petitioner from 22.11.1973 to 01.11.1976 for the purpose of pension and other retiral benefits in view of Government instructions dated 29.05.2006 2. In response to notice of motion, the reply has been filed, which is on record. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent-State submits that the dues, as claimed by the petitioner in the writ petition, have been paid to him and now nothing remains due to be paid to him. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the arrears and interest have not been paid to the petitioner so far. 5. Keeping in view the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and taking into account the fact that the necessary relief has been granted to the petitioner except the arrears and interest, the present petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file representation to the effect as to what has not been paid to him and how he is entitled for the interest as delay was not on the part of the respondents. 6. In case, any such representation is made within a period of one month from the date of receipt of copy of this order, the respondents are directed to consider the same within a period of three months thereafter. 7. The petition is disposed of accordingly.