Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2016 DIGILAW 210 (PAT)

Ranjeet Kumar @ Ranjeet Yadav v. State of Bihar

2016-02-29

ANJANA PRAKASH

body2016
JUDGMENT : ANJANA PRAKASH, J. 1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. This revision application has been filed for setting aside the order dated 13.8.2015 passed by the Sessions Judge, Gaya in Criminal Appeal (Juvenile) No. 34 of 2015, by which he has affirmed the order dated 27.7.2015 passed by the Juvenile Justice Board, Gaya in Sherghati (Dobhi) P.S. Case No. 264 of 2014, by which he has refused to release the Petitioner. 3. Considering that the Petitioner has not been named in the present case and he has been remanded from another case as also the Petitioner’s father undertakes his responsibility, let the petitioner above named, be released on furnishing bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Juvenile Justice Board, Gaya in connection with Sherghati (Dobhi) P.S. Case No. 264 of 2014, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailor shall be the father of the Petitioner and the other bailor will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of misuse, (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bond will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bond will be liable to be cancelled. 4. In view of the antecedents of the petitioner, the petitioner is directed to appear before the Superintendent of Police, Gaya within fifteen days of his release with a copy of this order and every two weeks thereafter for the next six months. 4. In view of the antecedents of the petitioner, the petitioner is directed to appear before the Superintendent of Police, Gaya within fifteen days of his release with a copy of this order and every two weeks thereafter for the next six months. The conduct of the petitioner will be kept under watch in this period by the superintendent of Police concerned and if it is found wanting in any respect, a report shall be made to the court concerned by him to initiate a proceeding for cancellation of bail for reasons of misuse of bail. After reporting to the Superintendent of Police, a certificate will be filed by the petitioner before the court concerned. 5. Accordingly, the revision application is allowed and the order dated 13.8.2015 passed by the Sessions Judge, Gaya in Criminal Appeal (Juvenile) No. 34 of 2015 as also the order dated 27.7.2015 passed by the Juvenile Justice Board, Gaya in Sherghati (Dobhi) P.S. Case No. 264 of 2014 is, hereby, set aside. Application allowed.